Shutterstock

News Advocacy

Joint vision for the future of 8 agricultural organizations

22 October 2025 - Klaas van der Horst - 13 comments

The business climate must be significantly improved, food security must be increased, and the approach to the nitrogen problem must be fundamentally changed. This is what eight organizations write in a joint report. vision document about the future of agriculture.

The parties involved are Agractie, DDB, FDF, NAV, NMV, NVP, POV, and VVK. Discussions were held with LTO-Nederland and the NAJK, but the differences in vision proved too great, according to coordinator Jeroen van Maanen. Their views on matters such as target management and other aspects of emissions policy are too divergent.

The business climate in the Netherlands is deteriorating, according to the six organizations. More than six in ten entrepreneurs consider the current business climate to be poor or very poor. In agriculture, that figure is even higher at seven in ten. Entrepreneurs are a crucial pillar of our society and economy. Moreover, the food supply is declining more and more rapidly.

Food security precarious
If a crisis breaks out, with imports and exports collapsing, the Netherlands already lacks enough food to feed its own population. Food security must therefore be placed much higher on the political agenda. Regarding the nitrogen problem, the organizations advocate for aligning with the European approach – which prioritizes nature conservation – and for the Netherlands to abandon its self-imposed, one-sided focus on nitrogen.

The organizations are calling for a significant reduction in regulatory burden. The Dutch business climate is deteriorating rapidly and urgently needs to improve. The Netherlands must stop imposing additional national regulations ("heads") on top of EU policy and commit to the rapid harmonization of European standards, particularly regarding water quality. It is incomprehensible that water flowing into our country from Belgium or Germany is considered "good" there, but "poor" in our country. Moreover, in large parts of the Netherlands, the quality of groundwater and surface water has been good for some time. These areas should therefore be declassified as vulnerable – a decision the Netherlands can make itself.

New, clean technology
Food security is central to the shared vision. This issue is becoming increasingly urgent due to the rapidly growing demand for food and rising geopolitical tensions. Our agrifood sector plays a leading role globally—with high-quality products, knowledge, and technology—and has developed into the largest manufacturing industry in the Netherlands. Family businesses are the cornerstone of this success. 

It is crucial that the sector can continue to develop. Relocating production abroad would actually be a step backward from the perspective of climate, nature, biodiversity, and animal welfare. Thanks to groundbreaking technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), food production can be even more precise, cleaner, and sustainable – while maintaining high quality standards and affordability for everyone. To stimulate this, the organizations propose the establishment of an Innovation Fund of €2,5 billion per year. They also advocate for the reclamation of the Markerwaard, partly in light of the expected population growth towards 20 million inhabitants, and for a separate Directorate for Food Security within the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LVVN).

Practical and realistic nitrogen policy
According to the eight organizations, the Netherlands must abandon its self-imposed, one-sided focus on nitrogen and the associated theoretical models' reality. This approach unnecessarily locks the country into a rut and offers no guarantee whatsoever for the preservation or restoration of nature. They advocate for the Netherlands to adopt the European approach, which prioritizes the conservation of nature. Nitrogen is just one of many pressures—alongside nature management, water supply, and soil quality, for example. The actual state of nature must be central. In concrete terms, this means replacing the critical deposition value (KDW) targets in the law with conservation targets. In addition, a policy-defined threshold value will be introduced to enable permitting again, in a form that eliminates the need for the Aerius model. Finally, the organizations are committed to an effective emission reduction policy that truly contributes to nature and is based on incentives rather than punishments. 

Soil, manure and crop protection
According to the organizations, a general legal standard for land-based fertilizers does not offer a suitable solution to the manure problem. Such an approach insufficiently considers the specific circumstances of farms and leads to a cumbersome regulatory landscape. This makes it unnecessarily difficult for many farms to remain profitable. Local soil fertility should be the guiding principle for fertilization, rather than national model averages. New technologies, such as precision agriculture, allow manure to be applied with increasing precision, tailored to the soil and crop. Manure is a valuable resource, and arable farmers are already expressing concern about the availability of manure on all land in the Netherlands.

Regarding crop protection products, the organizations warn against unnecessarily drastic, unsubstantiated measures, advocate for recognition of the current efforts of the plant sectors, and call for continued collaboration to improve and make the entire chain more sustainable.

Farmers' privacy
Finally, the organizations urgently call for better protection for farmers against activism and data misuse. In recent years, the agricultural sector has faced threats, unwanted farm entrances, arson, and barn burglaries and occupations by animal extremists. These incidents have not only deeply affected the direct victims but also created a lasting sense of insecurity. Furthermore, the number of Open Government Act (WOO) requests is increasing sharply. Information obtained through these requests—such as home addresses, GPS data, and information still pending in court—is regularly misused for purposes not intended by law. Because farmers' farms are also their homes, this represents a serious infringement of privacy and security. This must be stopped urgently.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Klaas van der Horst

He is a dairy market specialist at DCA Market Intelligence. He researches market news and trends and interprets developments.
Comments
13 comments
Subscriber
Arie poor branch. 23 October 2025
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914352/gezamenlijke-toekomstvisie-8-landbouworganisaties]Joint vision of the future of 8 agricultural organizations[/url]
It's incomprehensible that no one from the sector has responded to an article like the one above so far. Other topics are often discussed endlessly, with everyone arguing over each other's points, but on this, an important issue, there's a complete silence, as if it's none of their business. There's no agreement or opinion on what's being discussed. I'm not a farmer, but I don't understand this at all.
Subscriber
Southwest 23 October 2025
Arie poor branch. wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914352/gezamenlijke-toekomstvisie-8-landbouworganisaties]Joint vision of the future of 8 agricultural organizations[/url]
It's incomprehensible that no one from the sector has responded to an article like the one above so far. Other topics are often discussed endlessly, with everyone arguing over each other's points, but on this, an important issue, there's a complete silence, as if it's none of their business. There's no agreement or opinion on what's being discussed. I'm not a farmer, but I don't understand this at all.
Hey Arie, I'm a farmer, but I don't understand it either. But when things are set in stone, it's easier to complain afterward than to provide input now...
Subscriber
Arie poor branch. 23 October 2025
That's what I meant.
Subscriber
January 24 October 2025
I'm just seeing it now without LTO, which is paid by the state and has been dutifully carrying out its mission for years. Get lost, and that children's class too.
Subscriber
boer 24 October 2025
I get it. Those so-called farmers' representatives don't mean anything to those farmers. I don't know anyone here in Flevoland who's an LTO member. I don't think they have even 50 members, and all of Flevoland...
Subscriber
CM 24 October 2025
LTO is a thing of the past, and it's still primarily active in livestock farming. We're participating in discussions to avoid being completely forgotten.
Subscriber
plowman 25 October 2025
Yes, that's right. They only care about livestock farming. They've completely abandoned arable farming. I never hear anything about that either. There's still a department or sub-group for that. I don't think there's a separate board or chair anymore either.
No 25 October 2025
The Arable Farming Department still exists, but lately they've become (too) invisible. Tineke de Vries is listed as chair on the website.
Subscriber
brut 25 October 2025
There are a few agricultural parties: BBB, SGP, and FvD.
Subscriber
time bomb 25 October 2025
brut wrote:
There are a few agricultural parties: BBB, SGP, and FvD.
Yes, absolutely right, the rest is firewood. Almost every politician who HAD ANYTHING to do with agriculture is worthless NOW for agriculture, livestock farming, and anyone who cultivates/grows anything. Look at Ms. Vledder of the CDA, Mr. Holman of the NSC, Mr. Grinwis of the CU, and ALL the agricultural representatives of the other parties. NO ONE excepted. Very serious. Ms. Vos of the FVD (Foundation for Freedom and Democracy) has been particularly positive about agriculture and everything related to it so far. It's very bad that the traditional Dutch political system is abandoning agriculture in general like a ton of bricks.
Subscriber
CM 25 October 2025
Totally agree. The CDA has really fallen below the threshold as a party that stood up for farmers' interests. They only know how to utter the word "decency," but they'll be joining forces with Timmermans soon.
GLPvdA 25 October 2025
CM wrote:
Totally agree. The CDA has really fallen below the threshold as a party that stood up for farmers' interests. They only know how to utter the word "decency," but they'll be joining forces with Timmermans soon.
It seems beneficial for agriculture when parties in power hold positions that resonate with farmers. But in my experience, farmers' interests often turn out to be different, or even diametrically opposed, to what they think.
Subscriber
CM 25 October 2025
GLPvdA wrote:
CM wrote:
Totally agree. The CDA has really fallen below the threshold as a party that stood up for farmers' interests. They only know how to utter the word "decency," but they'll be joining forces with Timmermans soon.
It seems beneficial for agriculture when parties in power hold positions that resonate with farmers. But in my experience, farmers' interests often turn out to be different, or even diametrically opposed, to what they think.
Then you're completely alone in this. If agriculture has to act according to Bromet's plans, it will be the end.
Comment on this article

You must be logged in to respond to this article.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Register