Shutterstock

News Economy

Negative cash flow for a large part of arable farms

16 December 2025 - Linda van Eekeres - 28 comments

Of all agricultural and horticultural sectors, arable farms will have the smallest percentage of farms with a positive cash flow in 2025. This is evident from new figures from Wageningen University & Research (WUR), which the institute released during the presentation of the income forecast. 

55% of arable farms have a positive cash flow, compared to 76% for agriculture and horticulture as a whole. For 45% of arable farms, income is therefore insufficient to meet payment obligations (including repayments). 

For the vast majority, reducing maintenance, cutting back on personal expenses, or using savings offers a solution. Five percent of businesses also need to defer repayments. For 3 percent of the total, this isn't enough, and more significant adjustments are necessary.

According to Bert Smit, arable farming sector expert at Wageningen University & Research, 2025 was characterized by "fantastic production, with pricing as an anticlimax." "It's been a real disaster for potatoes," he says. Free-range potatoes are often being used as feed, and grain and sugar prices are also very low. Seed potato prices have also fallen. Onion prices are an exception, and it's hoped that will continue, Smit adds.

Arable farming income has fallen sharply, by €24.000 to €60.000 per unpaid annual labor unit (a worker working 2.000 hours or more per year). It is estimated that 20% of farms have a negative income of -€20.000 or more. Starch potato farms are an exception, where the average income has increased by €16.000 to €116.000. 

2022 was an exceptional year, with an average income of €151.500. Considering the work performed, the 2025 average isn't a very high income, according to WUR sector expert Mark Manshanden. He explains that for a larger group, incomes are more likely to be below than above average. Small businesses, in particular, are struggling, he says. "And the tax assessment is also coming in, and that covers years where things were going very well, so it will be quite high."

Profitability of arable farming down
Arable farming profitability for the 2025 harvest year is estimated at 91%, which is 7 percentage points lower than in 2024 and 13 percentage points lower than the average for the period 2020 to 2024.

According to the WUR, the net operating result for the average arable farm will be €40.200 in the red in 2025. Last year, it was -€7.900, while in previous years there were positive results of €34.500 (2023) and €79.200 (2022). In this calculation, hours worked are valued at the collective labor agreement hourly rate, including employer contributions. Interest is calculated on the capital (both debt and equity) (so the actual interest paid by the farms is not included). 

The Agricultural Confidence Index is also falling sharply. In the last survey in the third quarter of this year, arable farmers were more negative about their economic situation for the medium term (two to three years) than a quarter earlier. The index is at -20 points, while the average for arable farming since 2013 has been -3. 

Disaster year apotatoes
As mentioned, it's been a disastrous year for potatoes. It seemed like the European French fry processing industry was in a state of flux, and one after another announced plans to expand their lines. The thinking was that this year would be a demand market, but sales proved difficult, despite the fact that a combination of acreage expansion and good yields resulted in a much higher potato production.

Manshanden points out that China and India, in particular, are emerging as French fry producers. "Sales outside Europe are very limited. They were already limited, but the expectation was that we would increasingly export and sell more, and that has been a bit of a disappointment."

WUR doesn't have a clear picture of the income difference between contract growers and those with free potatoes, but it's undeniable that it's making a significant difference to potato growers' incomes this harvest year. Manshanden indicates that a lot of potatoes were under contract this year, "about 80% of the hectares, because of the good contract prices." "The higher the yield, the more is outside the contract price, so ultimately, about 56% of the potatoes were sold at contract prices, and the rest are all sold at free prices."

"We look at the average, and the contract price also plays a significant role, at 56%. But the rest goes for €3 or €4. If you, as a farmer, have to sell off completely freely, then you're really going to have a very tough year," says Manshanden.

The arable farming export sector believes demand for potatoes will continue to rise and global production can continue to grow. "But there will simply be much more competition abroad." Manshanden doesn't foresee a late-season recovery. "It's quite possible that sales will improve slightly at the very end of the season and prices will rise slightly. But I wouldn't expect it to improve significantly, because there are simply so many potatoes."

Little improvement expected next year
Smit also has a rather hopeful outlook for 2026: "Little improvement is expected for next year. Sugar and grain stocks are simply high." Cosun has reduced the allocation percentage for sugar beets by 10%. FarmFrites is already trying to break into existing potato contracts, so new ones won't be as good either, Smit indicates. Another concern is the rise of the glasswing cicadas which, according to him, causes enormous yield drops in sugar beets, grains and potatoes in southern Germany and the first attacks of which have been found in the Netherlands.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Linda van Eekeres

Linda van Eekeres is co-writing editor-in-chief. She mainly focuses on macro-economic developments and the influence of politics on the agricultural sector.
Comments
28 comments
Subscriber
frog 16 December 2025
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914875/negatieve-kasstroom-groot-deel-akkerbouwbedrijven]Negative cash flow for a large part of arable farms[/url]
Soon, the monthly lease for the tractor, harvester, and sprayer will be written off again, leaving an empty current account!
ed 16 December 2025
frog wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914875/negatieve-kasstroom-groot-deel-akkerbouwbedrijven]Negative cash flow for a large part of arable farms[/url]
Soon, the monthly lease for the tractor, harvester, and sprayer will be written off again, leaving an empty current account!
That account was already empty a few months ago. So there must be a large negative amount.
Subscriber
frog 16 December 2025
ed wrote:
frog wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914875/negatieve-kasstroom-groot-deel-akkerbouwbedrijven]Negative cash flow for a large part of arable farms[/url]
Soon, the monthly lease for the tractor, harvester, and sprayer will be written off again, leaving an empty current account!
That account was already empty a few months ago. So there must be a large negative amount.
Fortunately, the CAP subsidy is arriving this month.
Subscriber
Skirt 16 December 2025
Normally, after the boom years, it's not a problem to tap into the buffer. However, a lot of money has been invested in materials and land, which will certainly lead to acute problems here and there. And you can definitely count on another bad year after this one before the acreage has shrunk sufficiently.
Subscriber
frog 16 December 2025
kjol wrote:
Normally, after the boom years, it's not a problem to tap into the buffer. However, a lot of money has been invested in materials and land, which will certainly lead to acute problems here and there. And you can definitely count on another bad year after this one before the acreage has shrunk sufficiently.
Well, investing or paying taxes, we are no longer allowed to use resources!
Subscriber
Pieter 16 December 2025
frog wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914875/negatieve-kasstroom-groot-deel-akkerbouwbedrijven]Negative cash flow for a large part of arable farms[/url]
Soon, the monthly lease for the tractor, harvester, and sprayer will be written off again, leaving an empty current account!
You can always call Troostwijk, who will then provide cash.
Subscriber
drama 16 December 2025
kjol wrote:
Normally, after the boom years, it's not a problem to tap into the buffer. However, a lot of money has been invested in materials and land, which will certainly lead to acute problems here and there. And you can definitely count on another bad year after this one before the acreage has shrunk sufficiently.
Well, materials and land, far too much of it goes to the tax authorities here.
Subscriber
juun 16 December 2025
MIA/VAMIL or EIA investments in a good year, or maintenance of buildings, land, etc., directly deductible or generate additional deductions from your income. These are the ways to reduce income peaks.
min 16 December 2025
frog wrote:
ed wrote:
frog wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914875/negatieve-kasstroom-groot-deel-akkerbouwbedrijven]Negative cash flow for a large part of arable farms[/url]
Soon, the monthly lease for the tractor, harvester, and sprayer will be written off again, leaving an empty current account!
That account was already empty a few months ago. So there must be a large negative amount.
Fortunately, the CAP subsidy is arriving this month.
that is also considerably less, we can only close a small part of the gap
Subscriber
CM 16 December 2025
juun wrote:
MIA/VAMIL or EIA investments in a good year, or maintenance of buildings, land, etc., directly deductible or generate additional deductions from your income. These are the ways to reduce income peaks.
How about this year's free potatoes at 1,5 cents and a sugar beet price of 37,5 cents? That's also quite effective at suppressing income.
realist 16 December 2025
CM wrote:
juun wrote:
MIA/VAMIL or EIA investments in a good year, or maintenance of buildings, land, etc., directly deductible or generate additional deductions from your income. These are the ways to reduce income peaks.
How about this year's free potatoes at 1,5 cents and a sugar beet price of 37,5 cents? That's also quite effective at suppressing income.
beets not even over 40 euros?
Subscriber
juun 16 December 2025
CM wrote:
juun wrote:
MIA/VAMIL or EIA investments in a good year, or maintenance of buildings, land, etc., directly deductible or generate additional deductions from your income. These are the ways to reduce income peaks.
How about this year's free potatoes at 1,5 cents and a sugar beet price of 37,5 cents? That's also quite effective at suppressing income.
You can surely figure out for yourself that I'm talking about paying taxes in good years.
Subscriber
CM 16 December 2025
I'd stop talking tough about tax cuts for now. It'll be a survival scenario for many, and 26 doesn't look promising at the outset. Luxury problems about high incomes and reducing them are easy enough. Keeping things afloat when there's no money coming in is quite an achievement.
Subscriber
Mert 17 December 2025
realist wrote:
CM wrote:
juun wrote:
MIA/VAMIL or EIA investments in a good year, or maintenance of buildings, land, etc., directly deductible or generate additional deductions from your income. These are the ways to reduce income peaks.
How about this year's free potatoes at 1,5 cents and a sugar beet price of 37,5 cents? That's also quite effective at suppressing income.
beets not even over 40 euros?
Did you think so? I'm surprised we didn't receive a letter saying we had to repay part of the advance.
Subscriber
frog 17 December 2025
Pieter wrote:
frog wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914875/negatieve-kasstroom-groot-deel-akkerbouwbedrijven]Negative cash flow for a large part of arable farms[/url]
Soon, the monthly lease for the tractor, harvester, and sprayer will be written off again, leaving an empty current account!
You can always call Troostwijk, who will then provide cash.
Good luck with auctioning your lease tractor.
Subscriber
Northern clay grower 17 December 2025
Currently, the due date is regularly pushed back a day. Is it right that beet piles larger than agreed upon are collected all at once? Or is it right that Cosun sticks to its collection agreement and then leaves smaller portions for those who have more than agreed upon? I think so, because growers scheduled for after mid-December are also entitled to the delayed collection date. It's the same every year. January suppliers are at a maximum disadvantage when winter conditions arrive. Where are the member council representatives to keep an eye on things?
Subscriber
juun 17 December 2025
Northern clay grower wrote:
Currently, the due date is regularly pushed back a day. Is it right that beet piles larger than agreed upon are collected all at once? Or is it right that Cosun sticks to its collection agreement and then leaves smaller portions for those who have more than agreed upon? I think so, because growers scheduled for after mid-December are also entitled to the delayed collection date. It's the same every year. January suppliers are at a maximum disadvantage when winter conditions arrive. Where are the member council representatives to keep an eye on things?
The only right you have is the kitchen sink. They don't reach tons of land. You should be grateful they haven't overrun their yields. With the experiences of the past three or four years, they're already two weeks overrun. Besides, it only costs extra money if you have to load jobs anywhere at the end. And the cranes are no longer able to reach capacity with constant weighing at the end of the pile.
Subscriber
other peter 17 December 2025
Northern clay grower wrote:
Currently, the due date is regularly pushed back a day. Is it right that beet piles larger than agreed upon are collected all at once? Or is it right that Cosun sticks to its collection agreement and then leaves smaller portions for those who have more than agreed upon? I think so, because growers scheduled for after mid-December are also entitled to the delayed collection date. It's the same every year. January suppliers are at a maximum disadvantage when winter conditions arrive. Where are the member council representatives to keep an eye on things?
What are you so worried about? Every day later in January earns you a hefty storage fee. It's a good thing they didn't grant your wish last year. Then your hopes would have been raised while the factory was already closed. They were about 10 days behind back then.
Subscriber
juun 17 December 2025
other peter wrote:
Northern clay grower wrote:
Currently, the due date is regularly pushed back a day. Is it right that beet piles larger than agreed upon are collected all at once? Or is it right that Cosun sticks to its collection agreement and then leaves smaller portions for those who have more than agreed upon? I think so, because growers scheduled for after mid-December are also entitled to the delayed collection date. It's the same every year. January suppliers are at a maximum disadvantage when winter conditions arrive. Where are the member council representatives to keep an eye on things?
What are you so worried about? Every day later in January earns you a hefty storage fee. It's a good thing they didn't grant your wish last year. Then your hopes would have been raised while the factory was already closed. They were about 10 days behind back then.
Maybe in Dinteloord. Hoogkerk ran a bit behind again. I assume his beets are scheduled between Christmas and New Year's, and he doesn't feel like covering them. He probably doesn't have any barrels either, so all his own beets will fall into the planned barrels anyway. Well, we'll probably be at the same crane, but there are probably more here, so they'll be moved even further back. Just so you know.
Subscriber
18 December 2025
juun wrote:
other peter wrote:
Northern clay grower wrote:
Currently, the due date is regularly pushed back a day. Is it right that beet piles larger than agreed upon are collected all at once? Or is it right that Cosun sticks to its collection agreement and then leaves smaller portions for those who have more than agreed upon? I think so, because growers scheduled for after mid-December are also entitled to the delayed collection date. It's the same every year. January suppliers are at a maximum disadvantage when winter conditions arrive. Where are the member council representatives to keep an eye on things?
What are you so worried about? Every day later in January earns you a hefty storage fee. It's a good thing they didn't grant your wish last year. Then your hopes would have been raised while the factory was already closed. They were about 10 days behind back then.
Maybe in Dinteloord. Hoogkerk ran a bit behind again. I assume his beets are scheduled between Christmas and New Year's, and he doesn't feel like covering them. He probably doesn't have any barrels either, so all his own beets will fall into the planned barrels anyway. Well, we'll probably be at the same crane, but there are probably more here, so they'll be moved even further back. Just so you know.
Cool pear
Subscriber
Emmeloord 18 December 2025
The fact is that processing, particularly in Dinteloord, has experienced frequent disruptions and delays in recent weeks. As a result, extra beets are being shipped to Groningen, resulting in approximately 10% fewer shipments. It's pointless when, starting this week, the shipments are being pushed back even further while frost is looming, and the beets delivered last are only paid for as surplus. It would be great if Cosun were to be a little less strict about frost stress.
Subscriber
time bomb 18 December 2025
frog wrote:
ed wrote:
frog wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914875/negatieve-kasstroom-groot-deel-akkerbouwbedrijven]Negative cash flow for a large part of arable farms[/url]
Soon, the monthly lease for the tractor, harvester, and sprayer will be written off again, leaving an empty current account!
That account was already empty a few months ago. So there must be a large negative amount.
Fortunately, the CAP subsidy is arriving this month.
At least, if you have a good business advisor. Ours is a registered VAB organization, has the RVO access code, but forgets to send it to RVO, and as we know, RVO has no mercy (which is understandable, of course). Now he wants to settle for about half. We'll see how it turns out after a lawsuit.
Subscriber
juun 18 December 2025
Emmeloord wrote:
The fact is that processing, particularly in Dinteloord, has experienced frequent disruptions and delays in recent weeks. As a result, extra beets are being shipped to Groningen, resulting in approximately 10% fewer shipments. It's pointless when, starting this week, the shipments are being pushed back even further while frost is looming, and the beets delivered last are only paid for as surplus. It would be great if Cosun were to be a little less strict about frost stress.
Considering how much damage frost-damaged beets cause during processing, it would be better if they left frost-damaged beets unharmed. There's already too much sugar if you're too lazy to cover them, so they might as well leave them. It's already cost Cosun enough money over the past five years. It's always the same farmers.
glb 18 December 2025
time bomb wrote:
frog wrote:
ed wrote:
frog wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914875/negatieve-kasstroom-groot-deel-akkerbouwbedrijven]Negative cash flow for a large part of arable farms[/url]
Soon, the monthly lease for the tractor, harvester, and sprayer will be written off again, leaving an empty current account!
That account was already empty a few months ago. So there must be a large negative amount.
Fortunately, the CAP subsidy is arriving this month.
At least, if you have a good business advisor. Ours is a registered VAB organization, has the RVO access code, but forgets to send it to RVO, and as we know, RVO has no mercy (which is understandable, of course). Now he wants to settle for about half. We'll see how it turns out after a lawsuit.
Just fill it out yourself, right? If you even need an advisor for that!
Subscriber
Peter 18 December 2025
glb wrote:
time bomb wrote:
frog wrote:
ed wrote:
frog wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914875/negatieve-kasstroom-groot-deel-akkerbouwbedrijven]Negative cash flow for a large part of arable farms[/url]
Soon, the monthly lease for the tractor, harvester, and sprayer will be written off again, leaving an empty current account!
That account was already empty a few months ago. So there must be a large negative amount.
Fortunately, the CAP subsidy is arriving this month.
At least, if you have a good business advisor. Ours is a registered VAB organization, has the RVO access code, but forgets to send it to RVO, and as we know, RVO has no mercy (which is understandable, of course). Now he wants to settle for about half. We'll see how it turns out after a lawsuit.
Just fill it out yourself, right? If you even need an advisor for that!
No, of course not, fill it out yourself, have an advisor do it for you; that way you'll have an extra €1000 in support that you can immediately transfer to your advisor. Sometimes they get it wrong too, apparently, and then it's all about the fine print, including a lawyer at €200 per hour. A court hearing with all the associated costs. Ultimately, you're working for others. How can you say you're self-employed?
Subscriber
juun 18 December 2025
€1000 more income through an advisor? You're better off asking what the options are or just figuring it out yourself. It's not that exciting.
yvo 18 December 2025
juun wrote:
€1000 more income through an advisor? You're better off asking what the options are or just figuring it out yourself. It's not that exciting.
not filling in anything saves you peace of mind and a lot of interference from 3rd parties
Subscriber
juun 18 December 2025
yvo wrote:
juun wrote:
€1000 more income through an advisor? You're better off asking what the options are or just figuring it out yourself. It's not that exciting.
not filling in anything saves you peace of mind and a lot of interference from 3rd parties
You still have to comply with the guidelines, but they won't cut your subsidy. Instead, you'll receive a fine that you're obligated to pay. Plus, with current product prices, the subsidy is a welcome bonus.
yvo 19 December 2025
juun wrote:
yvo wrote:
juun wrote:
€1000 more income through an advisor? You're better off asking what the options are or just figuring it out yourself. It's not that exciting.
not filling in anything saves you peace of mind and a lot of interference from 3rd parties
You still have to comply with the guidelines, but they won't cut your subsidy. Instead, you'll receive a fine that you're obligated to pay. Plus, with current product prices, the subsidy is a welcome bonus.
I don't pay for anything anymore... they don't act like farmers here either!
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

News Economy

GroeNoord bankruptcy a major blow to tractor sales

News Economy

Agricultural prices to rise more than costs in 2025

News Economy

Balance in construction plan poses a major challenge for arable farming

News Economy

Sharp decline in arable farming income after strong years

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up