Shutterstock

Background Nitrogen mood

Chamber ignores Wiersma, forgets Nitrate Directive

19 December 2025 - Klaas van der Horst - 16 comments

On the last day before the Christmas recess, the new House of Representatives showed who's in charge in The Hague: Agriculture Minister Femke Wiersma or her political opponents. It was the latter, of course, as they hold a majority. Even the VVD, the last remaining ally in the struggling Schoof cabinet, abandoned Minister Wiersma when it came to voting on her fertilizer plans.

She might have seen it coming, as there was already a dispute with this party about water quality. The question is what Wiersma will do now. The fact is that a majority in the House of Representatives voted in favor of a motion by Christian Union MP Pieter Grinwis. It calls for the old 7th Nitrate Action Program to be continued for a while and for further decisions to be left to a new cabinet.

Read the guideline? Is the chairman awake?
It may not seem like an unreasonable question at first glance, but would Grinwis or one of his fellow voters the text of the Nitrates Directive Have you checked it? Article 3, paragraph 4, states that a new action program must be submitted at least every four years. That's not going to happen. Is the House of Representatives turning against the European Union with this? House Speaker Thom van Campen should have raised his hand and warned us.

It shouldn't be surprising if Brussels soon initiates an infringement procedure. Moreover, is there still a chance of a new derogation after this? Or was the intention to make everything go wrong? It's clear that the Schoof cabinet was anything but a model of clear and purposeful action, but the actions of the House of Representatives this week aren't exactly helping the livestock farming sector either.

Advocates silent, distracted
In fact, the problems for this sector are piling up. There will be no relaxation of requirements, but rather even more and stricter regulations. Another factor is that the agricultural sector itself is not sending clear and strong signals. Regarding manure policy, the Agractie and the Dutch Dairy Farmers' Union (NMV) were particularly vocal, in addition to individual experts. The Netherlands' largest agricultural advocacy group, LTO Nederland, is virtually absent from the public debate but also appears to be facing internal problems. Its director is transferring to the CNV union, the dairy farming sector association—already virtually invisible—is choosing the vice-chairman as a new face after a series of failed recruitment procedures, and the chair of the youth wing (NAJK) is also leaving. At tense meetings across the country, such as in Utrecht regarding the Utrecht Rural Area Program, the advocacy group is also struggling with its position. Enthusiasm and inspiration seem far away.

Chipmaker forgets agriculture
That impression remains even after the presentation of the Wennink report, by the former ASML director of the same name. The former head of the Veldhoven-based chip machine manufacturer was commissioned by the cabinet to write a report on the future earning capacity of the Netherlands, and in writing it, had practically overlooked the agricultural sector, even though it also has many manufacturing companies. Anyone who thought these companies and their organizations would then make themselves heard will be disappointed.

Agreement with MOB
Companies are keeping quiet, but also complying. MOB, Johan Vollenbroek's organization, triumphantly announced this week that it had forced several large food companies, including FrieslandCampina Veghel and previously Olam in Koog aan de Zaan, to reduce emissions. This was in exchange for an end to further legal proceedings. The press release This was even agreed upon jointly with FrieslandCampina and the province of North Brabant. Reducing emissions is fine in itself, but making agreements on this matter with activist groups feels dubious. Many Gelderland livestock farmers will inevitably recall the times when they had to deal with the Vereniging Milieu Offensief (VMO).

Brittle base
The Dutch food sector is increasingly under pressure, despite warnings about strategic interests. This Christmas, there will be plenty of food, and thanks to exceptionally favorable conditions, much of it is even quite affordable. However, this achievement rests on fragile foundations. The economic foundation of many farms that have produced so generously this year is often shaky. The lack of appreciation and opposition are also gnawing at them. Many farmers, in precisely this situation, would like to see a change and experience input on how they too can achieve a sustainable future. Ill-considered and poorly informed political decisions are not helping.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Klaas van der Horst

He is a dairy market specialist at DCA Market Intelligence. He researches market news and trends and interprets developments.

More about

Nitrogen mood
Comments
16 comments
Subscriber
long 19 December 2025
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10914926/kamer-negeert-wiersma-vergeet-nitraatrichtlijn]Chamber ignores Wiersma, forgets Nitrate Directive[/url]
Good analysis and reasonable truth but it remains in-house read BB this article should be on the front of VK or Telegraaf
Subscriber
juun 19 December 2025
Everyone in a public limited area where phosphate is the problem has been screwed over again. It's remarkable that, given all the options available, they always choose the worst or dumbest option. Even water boards were positive about abolishing this because it's inexplicable. And the politicians still think this is the best solution. They're bunglers.
Subscriber
time bomb 19 December 2025
juun wrote:
Everyone in a public limited area where phosphate is the problem has been screwed over again. It's remarkable that, given all the options available, they always choose the worst or dumbest option. Even water boards were positive about abolishing this because it's inexplicable. And the politicians still think this is the best solution. They're bunglers.
Could you please explain this better, because I think it's not that simple.
Subscriber
juun 19 December 2025
Areas have been designated where phosphate levels in surface water are too high and nitrogen levels are simply below the norm. However, they're getting a 20% reduction on the nitrogen standard, for nothing. They're also on the map. Nobody was happy about it, and now they're being screwed again. If nothing is done about it, filing a lawsuit becomes attractive. The derogation order expires on January 1st, so they no longer have a leg to stand on.
Subscriber
juun 19 December 2025
What most people don't know is that the Water Framework Directive (WFD) includes a ban on deterioration. I'm afraid the designated areas from recent years can't even be lifted. Because of that bungler of an Adema and the Ministry of Agriculture.
Subscriber
CM 20 December 2025
Those NV areas would be split into two: 10% and 20% instead of 20% each. And regarding the link between NV and excess phosphate, the plan in the 8th Nitrates Directive agreement was to also designate phosphate areas. So that supposedly incorrect link is also gone, but often both N and P reductions are returned. This applies primarily to the North and a large part of Brabant and the surrounding area. Maps are already available. So, Juun, you can't get away from it.
Subscriber
CM 20 December 2025
So, the designations for N areas will likely change quite a bit from the way they were. But that will come with additional restrictions, depending on the new map layout. Some will improve, but others will see even more added when the 8th plan comes into effect.
Subscriber
juun 20 December 2025
Phosphate measures aren't that exciting. A 20% reduction in your nitrogen standard for nothing is nonsense.
Subscriber
gerard 20 December 2025
I have heard that there is also a lot of nitrogen in seepage water
Subscriber
time bomb 20 December 2025
I think many are right, but WHO is raising this issue BEFORE the new cabinet takes office? Both parties are in a hurry to get the farmers out, and the farmers to stay. The entire left-wing group, including the CDA and CU, wants the farmers out; half of them don't. Let's stand up.
Jo 20 December 2025
Incitement. "Plenty of food this Christmas, but..." We produce three times more than we can eat. Doctors say we should actually eat less animal products. And nitrogen and phosphate come from animals, almost none from arable farming, horticulture, or fruit growing.
Subscriber
Drent 20 December 2025
jo wrote:
Incitement. "Plenty of food this Christmas, but..." We produce three times more than we can eat. Doctors say we should actually eat less animal products. And nitrogen and phosphate come from animals, almost none from arable farming, horticulture, or fruit growing.
Why do I, as an arable farmer, have problems with the limited liability areas?
Jo 20 December 2025
What do you grow and how do you fertilize? Nutrient leaching costs you money and ruins your environment.
Subscriber
Drent 20 December 2025
jo wrote:
What do you grow and how do you fertilize? Nutrient leaching costs you money and ruins your environment.
the NV areas are not removed there, so here on one side of the road I have no restriction and on the other side I do, how then
to you 21 December 2025
drent wrote:
jo wrote:
Incitement. "Plenty of food this Christmas, but..." We produce three times more than we can eat. Doctors say we should actually eat less animal products. And nitrogen and phosphate come from animals, almost none from arable farming, horticulture, or fruit growing.
Why do I, as an arable farmer, have problems with the limited liability areas?
Since when do you believe a doctor? None of this is a problem, nitrogen, phosphate, acid rain, etc., etc., etc. Just eat lots of meat, vegetables, and potatoes. My father lived to be 96. In our current fertilization plan, we have zero space, not even half of what the crop actually needs. We have buffer strips, and with restrictions and rules, how long will we allow ourselves to be screwed over and ruined, both financially and mentally? Doesn't anyone realize this? We just have to make way. The 2030 plans are being rolled out to perfection.
Subscriber
Drent 2.0 21 December 2025
drent wrote:
jo wrote:
What do you grow and how do you fertilize? Nutrient leaching costs you money and ruins your environment.
the NV areas are not removed there, so here on one side of the road I have no restriction and on the other side I do, how then
This is also the case here, at the border of two water boards. Several measurements have been taken here, showing that surface water and groundwater are below 50 mg, but the water board continues to insist on not sharing the data.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Background nitrogen mood

Almost goodbye Schoof, but reality plagues succession

Background Nitrogen mood

Utrecht's radical shrinkage plan draws full houses

Analysis Nitrogen mood

Derogation lost, is there still a way to recovery?

Background Nitrogen mood

Own watercolors lead to a dispute in The Hague

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up