The European agricultural machinery sector is in turmoil. Sales figures, and thus dealers' financial results, are under pressure. A wave of changes in Germany is causing the Netherlands to keep a close eye on the situation. What happens there could also happen here.
Now that all agricultural tractors have been provided with a license plate, it is much easier to gain insight into how many tractors are actually sold in the Netherlands. For example, in 2025, just under 2.200 new tractors were sold. license Plate posted. A decrease of 17% compared to 2024.
Gray import is large
Gray imports are now also clearly visible, and they're much larger than many people thought. In reality, the market is twice as large. Young used tractors also enter the Netherlands through official channels, but this is usually done by unofficial players. They steal valuable deals from importers and dealers.
Fendt, New Holland, John Deere, Deutz-Fahr, Massey Ferguson, and Valtra all sold more than one hundred new agricultural tractors in 2025, according to RDW data. Claas, Steyr, and Kubota are lower. They also have expensive sales teams. If this situation continues—and with the current slump in arable farming, dairy farming, and pig farming, it is expected to—it will be painful. Not all companies depend solely on tractors, but they are often the mainstay of the importer.
The picture is consistent across Europe. For example, tractor sales in Germany fell by a good 12% by 2025, and for the sub-100 hp segment, by almost a fifth. In France, tractor sales dropped by 18,5%. Dealers in Great Britain had to make do with 14% fewer tractors. These figures come from the trade associations for mechanical engineering companies.
Consolidation battle
Significant unrest has arisen in Germany following shifts in dealer positions early this year. CNH, the parent company of Case IH, New Holland, and Steyr, in particular, is undergoing a rigorous reorganization of its dealer structure. This began last November when the American Titan Machinery (one of the largest American dealerships) announced it was transferring its German locations to two colleagues. These companies were already New Holland dealers. Case IH is joining them. This fits within the "Multi-Brand Strategy" that CNH is rolling out for our eastern neighbors. A consolidation drive, in which multiple brands are carried by each company, similar to what Agco has been doing for some time with Fendt, MF, and Valtra.
At the end of January, Deutz-Fahr dealer D. Lankhorst, located near the Dutch border, announced it would be switching to CNH brands. This came as a complete surprise, especially since Lankhorst, owned by the Krone holding company, was also a dealer for this brand. How the company will combine this with New Holland haymaking machinery has not yet been announced.
Big consequences
This move has major consequences for other dealerships in the region. CNH has terminated or amended contracts with five other companies, depending on the terms of the contract. One of these companies, ABC Bruns, announced shortly thereafter that it has filed for a payment moratorium. The company, also located near the border, is experiencing financial difficulties and is reorganizing. Equally noteworthy is that one of the other companies (Reise Landtechnik) had just announced that, in addition to Case IH and Steyr, it will also acquire New Holland.
CNH wasn't the only one in the news. Ipso Agricultura, a Romanian-French John Deere dealership headed by Dutchman Arnaud van Strien, announced the acquisition of Rebo and B+S. These two German companies also sell this brand and together have seventeen locations. Ipso already has 45 locations in three countries, creating a super-dealer. By comparison, the largest American John Deere dealer, RDO Equipment, has 75 locations. With 62, Ipso is already approaching that number.
Consequences for the Netherlands
In lean times, belts are tightened and consolidation takes place in the sector. The Netherlands could also be affected by this. With relatively low sales figures and a high level of specialization, most international players avoid our country. So far, this has remained the case with BayWa, owner of Abemec. The troubled BayWa recently announced known €1,5 million to be invested in the expansion of one of the Abemec locations in Hoogeloon.
Consolidation doesn't always have to come from the manufacturer. Just look at the bankruptcy of GroeNoord and the fact that Kraakman remained the sole dealer. It can also happen the other way around, as Mechan International demonstrates. As part of the Zweegers Equipment Group, it acquired a majority stake in an Italian AGCO dealer last month. This isn't the first time. It also operates in Denmark, Germany, France, and Canada.
Eat or be eaten
The reality dealers face is similar to the challenges farmers face: incomes are under pressure, staff are becoming increasingly difficult to find, and let's not forget the aging population. Agricultural entrepreneurs are keeping a tight rein on spending for now, and that's being felt. The past few years have been good, but the reality today is different. Survival can be achieved by staying quiet, or by going on the offensive. In the world of dealers, it's still a case of eat or be eaten.
© DCA Market Intelligence. This market information is subject to copyright. It is not permitted to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or make the content available to third parties for compensation, in any form, without the express written permission of DCA Market Intelligence.
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10915271/het-rommelt-in-dealerland-en-dit-is-waarom]There's trouble in the dealerland and this is why[/url]
Moreover, many of us have changed our clothes quite a bit in recent years.
The livestock farmers are also keeping a tight rein on spending. The price of just 40 cents for milk isn't exactly great. Chickens are golden, though.
juun wrote:Only laying hens. Broilers just barely cover their costs.The livestock farmers are also keeping a tight rein on spending. The price of just 40 cents for milk isn't exactly great. Chickens are golden, though.
Anyone who can still purchase a new harvester at the end of the season will be in with a golden opportunity. Production is booming, but sales have completely collapsed.
challenger wrote:Harvesters are leased almost 100% anyway, so there won't be much difference there. Moreover, production is already being reduced, especially for harvesting machines.Anyone who can still purchase a new harvester at the end of the season will be in with a golden opportunity. Production is booming, but sales have completely collapsed.
Manus wrote:Whether you lease or buy, if the marbles aren't there, it makes little difference.challenger wrote:Harvesters are leased almost 100% anyway, so there won't be much difference there. Moreover, production is already being reduced, especially for harvesting machines.Anyone who can still purchase a new harvester at the end of the season will be in with a golden opportunity. Production is booming, but sales have completely collapsed.
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
There's a big difference between buying now and leasing. With a lease, you spread the purchase over years instead of buying everything in one go. Moreover, you still have years to earn back the investment, as you expect when you enter into that contract. With harvesters approaching a million, you do need to spread that investment.
juun wrote:Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
juun wrote:Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
juun wrote:The correct four-row model clearly has less damage, and will certainly be seen in these years. Even the machines that fail.You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Manus wrote:Could you please explain the difference between leasing the harvester for 5% and taking out a 5% bank loan? Which one do you think would be cheaper?There's a big difference between buying now and leasing. With a lease, you spread the purchase over years instead of buying everything in one go. Moreover, you still have years to earn back the investment, as you expect when you enter into that contract. With harvesters approaching a million, you do need to spread that investment.
Manus wrote:A bit weak, Manus. Admitting you're wrong isn't your strong suit.juun wrote:Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
dago wrote:Which bank would you expect to finance a $1 million machine? Unless, of course, there's a lease contract.Manus wrote:Could you please explain the difference between leasing the harvester for 5% and taking out a 5% bank loan? Which one do you think would be cheaper?There's a big difference between buying now and leasing. With a lease, you spread the purchase over years instead of buying everything in one go. Moreover, you still have years to earn back the investment, as you expect when you enter into that contract. With harvesters approaching a million, you do need to spread that investment.
juun wrote:Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
wrote:By buying, I mean you've already earned the money yourself. A bank loan is practically the same as leasing. With leasing, you still have to earn the money. Anyone who needs a 4-row machine won't buy a 2-row machine, especially not a used one. Juun is a potato grower, apparently, who will tell consumer growers how to do it. Let others decide for themselves how, what, where, and why to invest. Don't need others, or will they contribute? I don't think so.dago wrote:Which bank would you expect to finance a $1 million machine? Unless, of course, there's a lease contract.Manus wrote:Could you please explain the difference between leasing the harvester for 5% and taking out a 5% bank loan? Which one do you think would be cheaper?There's a big difference between buying now and leasing. With a lease, you spread the purchase over years instead of buying everything in one go. Moreover, you still have years to earn back the investment, as you expect when you enter into that contract. With harvesters approaching a million, you do need to spread that investment.
Arie poor branch. wrote:What are you talking about, Arie? Who is? Getting a bit senile or something. If Juun makes that comparison, it's okay, and I do the same, so it's definitely not possible. So, goodbye to your nonsense.Manus wrote:A bit weak, Manus. Admitting you're wrong isn't your strong suit.juun wrote:Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Manus wrote:Oh, my goodness.Arie poor branch. wrote:What are you talking about, Arie? Who is? Getting a bit senile or something. If Juun makes that comparison, it's okay, and I do the same, so it's definitely not possible. So, goodbye to your nonsense.Manus wrote:A bit weak, Manus. Admitting you're wrong isn't your strong suit.juun wrote:Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Arie poor branch. wrote:Mr. Manus has to make another personal attack, because he certainly doesn't win on arguments.Manus wrote:Oh, my goodness.Arie poor branch. wrote:What are you talking about, Arie? Who is? Getting a bit senile or something. If Juun makes that comparison, it's okay, and I do the same, so it's definitely not possible. So, goodbye to your nonsense.Manus wrote:A bit weak, Manus. Admitting you're wrong isn't your strong suit.juun wrote:Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
As long as you don't have to harvest 150-200 acres of potatoes, a 4-row cultivator is simply over-mechanized. Better yet, you'd squeeze 3,400 acres through a 4-row cultivator. That's what they're built for. If you're always stirring the gravel, you should either do your spring work by creating enough loose soil, or just not plant potatoes in that soil—plain and simple.
juun wrote:That wasn't the whole point of the discussion. I didn't discuss how many hectares to harvest. The discussion was about buying versus leasing.As long as you don't have to harvest 150-200 acres of potatoes, a 4-row cultivator is simply over-mechanized. Better yet, you'd squeeze 3,400 acres through a 4-row cultivator. That's what they're built for. If you're always stirring the gravel, you should either do your spring work by creating enough loose soil, or just not plant potatoes in that soil—plain and simple.
Manus wrote:Yes, and you were talking about machines going towards a million, which are only the 4-row machines. To which I replied, you could also buy a 2-row machine that costs less than half a million.juun wrote:That wasn't the whole point of the discussion. I didn't discuss how many hectares to harvest. The discussion was about buying versus leasing.As long as you don't have to harvest 150-200 acres of potatoes, a 4-row cultivator is simply over-mechanized. Better yet, you'd squeeze 3,400 acres through a 4-row cultivator. That's what they're built for. If you're always stirring the gravel, you should either do your spring work by creating enough loose soil, or just not plant potatoes in that soil—plain and simple.
juun wrote:No, because then I wouldn't have been talking about almost a million if I meant a 2-row tractor. Those who buy or lease a 4-row tractor do so because the 2-row tractor doesn't have enough capacity. Not because they like to spend a lot of money. Besides, I wasn't talking about harvesters, but about harvesters.Manus wrote:Yes, and you were talking about machines going towards a million, which are only the 4-row machines. To which I replied, you could also buy a 2-row machine that costs less than half a million.juun wrote:That wasn't the whole point of the discussion. I didn't discuss how many hectares to harvest. The discussion was about buying versus leasing.As long as you don't have to harvest 150-200 acres of potatoes, a 4-row cultivator is simply over-mechanized. Better yet, you'd squeeze 3,400 acres through a 4-row cultivator. That's what they're built for. If you're always stirring the gravel, you should either do your spring work by creating enough loose soil, or just not plant potatoes in that soil—plain and simple.
It started with leasing, and you're just harping on about two drivers who can handle the work of four. Stop this!
Manus wrote:I know of some others that would be fine with a 2-row combine but run on a 4-row. And about the last sentence: you'll need a new X9 1100 or an AF11 combine to thresh that expensive wheat costing 17 to 19 cents, yes, with those large acreages in Belgium or the Netherlands. Imagine having to combine for a week. A farmer almost never buys a new beet harvester.juun wrote:No, because then I wouldn't have been talking about almost a million if I meant a 2-row tractor. Those who buy or lease a 4-row tractor do so because the 2-row tractor doesn't have enough capacity. Not because they like to spend a lot of money. Besides, I wasn't talking about harvesters, but about harvesters.Manus wrote:Yes, and you were talking about machines going towards a million, which are only the 4-row machines. To which I replied, you could also buy a 2-row machine that costs less than half a million.juun wrote:That wasn't the whole point of the discussion. I didn't discuss how many hectares to harvest. The discussion was about buying versus leasing.As long as you don't have to harvest 150-200 acres of potatoes, a 4-row cultivator is simply over-mechanized. Better yet, you'd squeeze 3,400 acres through a 4-row cultivator. That's what they're built for. If you're always stirring the gravel, you should either do your spring work by creating enough loose soil, or just not plant potatoes in that soil—plain and simple.
I don't think Manus meant at all with his talk about leasing that it was only about farmers investing. Others were taking things a bit too far in a certain direction. For now, most are keeping a tight rein on spending, but I'm seeing several tractor manufacturers trying to lure customers with five-year lease contracts at 0% interest.
CM wrote:klopt ,maar fendt (nog) nietI don't think Manus meant at all with his talk about leasing that it was only about farmers investing. Others were taking things a bit too far in a certain direction. For now, most are keeping a tight rein on spending, but I'm seeing several tractor manufacturers trying to lure customers with five-year lease contracts at 0% interest.
516 wrote:Fendt heeft zo'n hoge inruilwaarde. Die heeft dat niet nodig, hoor ik altijd.....CM wrote:klopt ,maar fendt (nog) nietI don't think Manus meant at all with his talk about leasing that it was only about farmers investing. Others were taking things a bit too far in a certain direction. For now, most are keeping a tight rein on spending, but I'm seeing several tractor manufacturers trying to lure customers with five-year lease contracts at 0% interest.