Shutterstock

Opinions Niels van der Boom

There's trouble in dealer land and this is why

Thursday 08:00 PM - Niels van der Boom - 51 comments

The European agricultural machinery sector is in turmoil. Sales figures, and thus dealers' financial results, are under pressure. A wave of changes in Germany is causing the Netherlands to keep a close eye on the situation. What happens there could also happen here.

Now that all agricultural tractors have been provided with a license plate, it is much easier to gain insight into how many tractors are actually sold in the Netherlands. For example, in 2025, just under 2.200 new tractors were sold. license Plate posted. A decrease of 17% compared to 2024.

Gray import is large
Gray imports are now also clearly visible, and they're much larger than many people thought. In reality, the market is twice as large. Young used tractors also enter the Netherlands through official channels, but this is usually done by unofficial players. They steal valuable deals from importers and dealers.

Fendt, New Holland, John Deere, Deutz-Fahr, Massey Ferguson, and Valtra all sold more than one hundred new agricultural tractors in 2025, according to RDW data. Claas, Steyr, and Kubota are lower. They also have expensive sales teams. If this situation continues—and with the current slump in arable farming, dairy farming, and pig farming, it is expected to—it will be painful. Not all companies depend solely on tractors, but they are often the mainstay of the importer.

The picture is consistent across Europe. For example, tractor sales in Germany fell by a good 12% by 2025, and for the sub-100 hp segment, by almost a fifth. In France, tractor sales dropped by 18,5%. Dealers in Great Britain had to make do with 14% fewer tractors. These figures come from the trade associations for mechanical engineering companies. 

Consolidation battle
Significant unrest has arisen in Germany following shifts in dealer positions early this year. CNH, the parent company of Case IH, New Holland, and Steyr, in particular, is undergoing a rigorous reorganization of its dealer structure. This began last November when the American Titan Machinery (one of the largest American dealerships) announced it was transferring its German locations to two colleagues. These companies were already New Holland dealers. Case IH is joining them. This fits within the "Multi-Brand Strategy" that CNH is rolling out for our eastern neighbors. A consolidation drive, in which multiple brands are carried by each company, similar to what Agco has been doing for some time with Fendt, MF, and Valtra.

At the end of January, Deutz-Fahr dealer D. Lankhorst, located near the Dutch border, announced it would be switching to CNH brands. This came as a complete surprise, especially since Lankhorst, owned by the Krone holding company, was also a dealer for this brand. How the company will combine this with New Holland haymaking machinery has not yet been announced.

Big consequences
This move has major consequences for other dealerships in the region. CNH has terminated or amended contracts with five other companies, depending on the terms of the contract. One of these companies, ABC Bruns, announced shortly thereafter that it has filed for a payment moratorium. The company, also located near the border, is experiencing financial difficulties and is reorganizing. Equally noteworthy is that one of the other companies (Reise Landtechnik) had just announced that, in addition to Case IH and Steyr, it will also acquire New Holland.

CNH wasn't the only one in the news. Ipso Agricultura, a Romanian-French John Deere dealership headed by Dutchman Arnaud van Strien, announced the acquisition of Rebo and B+S. These two German companies also sell this brand and together have seventeen locations. Ipso already has 45 locations in three countries, creating a super-dealer. By comparison, the largest American John Deere dealer, RDO Equipment, has 75 locations. With 62, Ipso is already approaching that number.

Consequences for the Netherlands
In lean times, belts are tightened and consolidation takes place in the sector. The Netherlands could also be affected by this. With relatively low sales figures and a high level of specialization, most international players avoid our country. So far, this has remained the case with BayWa, owner of Abemec. The troubled BayWa recently announced known €1,5 million to be invested in the expansion of one of the Abemec locations in Hoogeloon.

Consolidation doesn't always have to come from the manufacturer. Just look at the bankruptcy of GroeNoord and the fact that Kraakman remained the sole dealer. It can also happen the other way around, as Mechan International demonstrates. As part of the Zweegers Equipment Group, it acquired a majority stake in an Italian AGCO dealer last month. This isn't the first time. It also operates in Denmark, Germany, France, and Canada.

Eat or be eaten
The reality dealers face is similar to the challenges farmers face: incomes are under pressure, staff are becoming increasingly difficult to find, and let's not forget the aging population. Agricultural entrepreneurs are keeping a tight rein on spending for now, and that's being felt. The past few years have been good, but the reality today is different. Survival can be achieved by staying quiet, or by going on the offensive. In the world of dealers, it's still a case of eat or be eaten.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Niels van der Boom

Niels van der Boom is a senior market specialist for arable crops at DCA Market Intelligence. He mainly makes analyses and market updates about the potato market. In columns he shares his sharp view on the arable sector and technology.
Comments
51 comments
Subscriber
516 Thursday 17:15 PM
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10915271/het-rommelt-in-dealerland-en-dit-is-waarom]There's trouble in the dealerland and this is why[/url]
am not surprised
Subscriber
Sine Thursday 21:40 PM
With Robby Jetten at the wheel, things are getting bleak in agriculture.
Subscriber
frog Friday 13:55 PM
Speaking of the new green-yellow dealer in the north, how long will it last? They're not selling tractors in large numbers right now, and they don't have much else in their product lineup. Hopefully, no Greenoord 2.0!
Subscriber
juun Friday 15:19 PM
In any case, there will be a tight rein on spending starting in December. And they're all unlucky because the two largest sectors are both experiencing or facing low prices. The Dewulf factory had already reduced working hours at the factory last fall.
Subscriber
frog Friday 15:24 PM
K
Subscriber
frog Friday 15:25 PM
Moreover, many of us have changed our clothes quite a bit in recent years.
Subscriber
juun Friday 18:55 PM
frog wrote:
Moreover, many of us have changed our clothes quite a bit in recent years.
Yes, that too, and they're certainly not written off yet. Tractors have already dropped considerably in price, but the other machines can also be discounted after the COVID-19 premium, because the cost of machines seemed almost ridiculous in the end.
Subscriber
arable... Sunday 19:23 pm
is going to mess around a lot more
Subscriber
kees The day before yesterday 08:02 am
milk and bulbs are still doing well, especially bulbs with forcing
Subscriber
juun The day before yesterday 08:21 am
The livestock farmers are also keeping a tight rein on spending. The price of just 40 cents for milk isn't exactly great. Chickens are golden, though.
Subscriber
Broilers The day before yesterday 12:45 am
juun wrote:
The livestock farmers are also keeping a tight rein on spending. The price of just 40 cents for milk isn't exactly great. Chickens are golden, though.
Only laying hens. Broilers just barely cover their costs.
Subscriber
juun The day before yesterday 13:02 am
Broilers wrote:
juun wrote:
The livestock farmers are also keeping a tight rein on spending. The price of just 40 cents for milk isn't exactly great. Chickens are golden, though.
Only laying hens. Broilers just barely cover their costs.
Well, broiler chickens are also just really good. The batteries with EIA are often installed at poultry farms, and for good reason.
Subscriber
juun The day before yesterday 13:07 am
by the way, they deserve it wholeheartedly.
Hoi The day before yesterday 15:24 am
You don't need a tractor for chickens.
Subscriber
Challenger The day before yesterday 22:14 am
Anyone who can still purchase a new harvester at the end of the season will be in with a golden opportunity. Production is booming, but sales have completely collapsed.
Subscriber
Manus Yesterday 01:22 PM
challenger wrote:
Anyone who can still purchase a new harvester at the end of the season will be in with a golden opportunity. Production is booming, but sales have completely collapsed.
Harvesters are leased almost 100% anyway, so there won't be much difference there. Moreover, production is already being reduced, especially for harvesting machines.
Subscriber
Arie poor branch. Yesterday 09:27 PM
Manus wrote:
challenger wrote:
Anyone who can still purchase a new harvester at the end of the season will be in with a golden opportunity. Production is booming, but sales have completely collapsed.
Harvesters are leased almost 100% anyway, so there won't be much difference there. Moreover, production is already being reduced, especially for harvesting machines.
Whether you lease or buy, if the marbles aren't there, it makes little difference.
Subscriber
frog Yesterday 10:19 PM
Arie poor branch. wrote:
Manus wrote:
challenger wrote:
Anyone who can still purchase a new harvester at the end of the season will be in with a golden opportunity. Production is booming, but sales have completely collapsed.
Harvesters are leased almost 100% anyway, so there won't be much difference there. Moreover, production is already being reduced, especially for harvesting machines.
Whether you lease or buy, if the marbles aren't there, it makes little difference.
And if the marbles are there, they should also keep a close eye on the shop, that's my opinion.
Subscriber
juun Yesterday 10:39 PM
Yes, it is often smart to keep a buffer for leaner times.
Subscriber
Manus Yesterday 10:45 PM
There's a big difference between buying now and leasing. With a lease, you spread the purchase over years instead of buying everything in one go. Moreover, you still have years to earn back the investment, as you expect when you enter into that contract. With harvesters approaching a million, you do need to spread that investment.
Subscriber
juun Yesterday 11:00 PM
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Subscriber
Manus Yesterday 11:52 PM
juun wrote:
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...
Subscriber
Dago Yesterday 11:52 PM
Manus wrote:
There's a big difference between buying now and leasing. With a lease, you spread the purchase over years instead of buying everything in one go. Moreover, you still have years to earn back the investment, as you expect when you enter into that contract. With harvesters approaching a million, you do need to spread that investment.
Could you please explain the difference between leasing the harvester for 5% and taking out a 5% bank loan? Which one do you think would be cheaper?
Subscriber
juun Yesterday 12:48 PM
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...
They complain about the price but still buy expensive stuff. Gosh, where does that high price come from?
Subscriber
juun Yesterday 12:49 PM
By the way, you can safely buy a used harvester with consumption, but you can check it in the winter.
Subscriber
Agristo Yesterday 12:54 PM
juun wrote:
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
The correct four-row model clearly has less damage, and will certainly be seen in these years. Even the machines that fail.
Subscriber
Arie poor branch. Yesterday 13:06 PM
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...
A bit weak, Manus. Admitting you're wrong isn't your strong suit.
Subscriber
juun Yesterday 13:18 PM
Agristo wrote:
juun wrote:
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
The correct four-row model clearly has less damage, and will certainly be seen in these years. Even the machines that fail.
That will be true. Ultimately, it has more to do with product flow conditions and setup. That doesn't mean a two-rower will give a poorer result. Ultimately, the person sitting between the seat and the steering wheel makes the difference.
Subscriber
Yesterday 13:55 PM
dago wrote:
Manus wrote:
There's a big difference between buying now and leasing. With a lease, you spread the purchase over years instead of buying everything in one go. Moreover, you still have years to earn back the investment, as you expect when you enter into that contract. With harvesters approaching a million, you do need to spread that investment.
Could you please explain the difference between leasing the harvester for 5% and taking out a 5% bank loan? Which one do you think would be cheaper?
Which bank would you expect to finance a $1 million machine? Unless, of course, there's a lease contract.
Subscriber
Manus Yesterday 16:02 PM
Arie poor branch. wrote:
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...
A bit weak, Manus. Admitting you're wrong isn't your strong suit.
What are you talking about, Arie? Who is? Getting a bit senile or something. If Juun makes that comparison, it's okay, and I do the same, so it's definitely not possible. So, goodbye to your nonsense.
Subscriber
Manus Yesterday 16:12 PM
wrote:
dago wrote:
Manus wrote:
There's a big difference between buying now and leasing. With a lease, you spread the purchase over years instead of buying everything in one go. Moreover, you still have years to earn back the investment, as you expect when you enter into that contract. With harvesters approaching a million, you do need to spread that investment.
Could you please explain the difference between leasing the harvester for 5% and taking out a 5% bank loan? Which one do you think would be cheaper?
Which bank would you expect to finance a $1 million machine? Unless, of course, there's a lease contract.
By buying, I mean you've already earned the money yourself. A bank loan is practically the same as leasing. With leasing, you still have to earn the money. Anyone who needs a 4-row machine won't buy a 2-row machine, especially not a used one. Juun is a potato grower, apparently, who will tell consumer growers how to do it. Let others decide for themselves how, what, where, and why to invest. Don't need others, or will they contribute? I don't think so.
Subscriber
Arie poor branch. Yesterday 16:31 PM
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...
A bit weak, Manus. Admitting you're wrong isn't your strong suit.
Subscriber
juun Yesterday 16:43 PM
Manus wrote:
wrote:
dago wrote:
Manus wrote:
There's a big difference between buying now and leasing. With a lease, you spread the purchase over years instead of buying everything in one go. Moreover, you still have years to earn back the investment, as you expect when you enter into that contract. With harvesters approaching a million, you do need to spread that investment.
Could you please explain the difference between leasing the harvester for 5% and taking out a 5% bank loan? Which one do you think would be cheaper?
Which bank would you expect to finance a $1 million machine? Unless, of course, there's a lease contract.
By buying, I mean you've already earned the money yourself. A bank loan is practically the same as leasing. With leasing, you still have to earn the money. Anyone who needs a 4-row machine won't buy a 2-row machine, especially not a used one. Juun is a potato grower, apparently, who will tell consumer growers how to do it. Let others decide for themselves how, what, where, and why to invest. Don't need others, or will they contribute? I don't think so.
Oh, and what exactly is wrong with a used one? Haven't you paid off your 4-wheeler lease yet? Those 0-cent feed potatoes certainly bring in a lot of money ;)
Subscriber
Arie poor branch. Yesterday 16:43 PM
Manus wrote:
Arie poor branch. wrote:
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...
A bit weak, Manus. Admitting you're wrong isn't your strong suit.
What are you talking about, Arie? Who is? Getting a bit senile or something. If Juun makes that comparison, it's okay, and I do the same, so it's definitely not possible. So, goodbye to your nonsense.
Oh, my goodness.
Subscriber
juun Yesterday 16:45 PM
Arie poor branch. wrote:
Manus wrote:
Arie poor branch. wrote:
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...
A bit weak, Manus. Admitting you're wrong isn't your strong suit.
What are you talking about, Arie? Who is? Getting a bit senile or something. If Juun makes that comparison, it's okay, and I do the same, so it's definitely not possible. So, goodbye to your nonsense.
Oh, my goodness.
Mr. Manus has to make another personal attack, because he certainly doesn't win on arguments.
Subscriber
CM Yesterday 17:08 PM
juun wrote:
Arie poor branch. wrote:
Manus wrote:
Arie poor branch. wrote:
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
You don't need to buy a 4-row machine. A 2-row machine does exactly the same thing.
Yes, and a single-row machine does the same as a double-row machine. What a...
A bit weak, Manus. Admitting you're wrong isn't your strong suit.
What are you talking about, Arie? Who is? Getting a bit senile or something. If Juun makes that comparison, it's okay, and I do the same, so it's definitely not possible. So, goodbye to your nonsense.
Oh, my goodness.
Mr. Manus has to make another personal attack, because he certainly doesn't win on arguments.
Ha ha, you're completely wrong. Dare to admit you're wrong instead of turning it around. Go for it, Manus.
Subscriber
PH Yesterday 17:38 PM
Manus isn't talking nonsense about buying and leasing, but others are trying to ridicule him with bogus arguments. But they don't realize they're ridiculing themselves.
Subscriber
juun Yesterday 18:25 PM
As long as you don't have to harvest 150-200 acres of potatoes, a 4-row cultivator is simply over-mechanized. Better yet, you'd squeeze 3,400 acres through a 4-row cultivator. That's what they're built for. If you're always stirring the gravel, you should either do your spring work by creating enough loose soil, or just not plant potatoes in that soil—plain and simple.
Subscriber
Manus Yesterday 18:30 PM
juun wrote:
As long as you don't have to harvest 150-200 acres of potatoes, a 4-row cultivator is simply over-mechanized. Better yet, you'd squeeze 3,400 acres through a 4-row cultivator. That's what they're built for. If you're always stirring the gravel, you should either do your spring work by creating enough loose soil, or just not plant potatoes in that soil—plain and simple.
That wasn't the whole point of the discussion. I didn't discuss how many hectares to harvest. The discussion was about buying versus leasing.
Subscriber
juun Yesterday 18:49 PM
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
As long as you don't have to harvest 150-200 acres of potatoes, a 4-row cultivator is simply over-mechanized. Better yet, you'd squeeze 3,400 acres through a 4-row cultivator. That's what they're built for. If you're always stirring the gravel, you should either do your spring work by creating enough loose soil, or just not plant potatoes in that soil—plain and simple.
That wasn't the whole point of the discussion. I didn't discuss how many hectares to harvest. The discussion was about buying versus leasing.
Yes, and you were talking about machines going towards a million, which are only the 4-row machines. To which I replied, you could also buy a 2-row machine that costs less than half a million.
Subscriber
Manus Yesterday 20:36 PM
juun wrote:
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
As long as you don't have to harvest 150-200 acres of potatoes, a 4-row cultivator is simply over-mechanized. Better yet, you'd squeeze 3,400 acres through a 4-row cultivator. That's what they're built for. If you're always stirring the gravel, you should either do your spring work by creating enough loose soil, or just not plant potatoes in that soil—plain and simple.
That wasn't the whole point of the discussion. I didn't discuss how many hectares to harvest. The discussion was about buying versus leasing.
Yes, and you were talking about machines going towards a million, which are only the 4-row machines. To which I replied, you could also buy a 2-row machine that costs less than half a million.
No, because then I wouldn't have been talking about almost a million if I meant a 2-row tractor. Those who buy or lease a 4-row tractor do so because the 2-row tractor doesn't have enough capacity. Not because they like to spend a lot of money. Besides, I wasn't talking about harvesters, but about harvesters.
Subscriber
juun Yesterday 21:00 PM
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
As long as you don't have to harvest 150-200 acres of potatoes, a 4-row cultivator is simply over-mechanized. Better yet, you'd squeeze 3,400 acres through a 4-row cultivator. That's what they're built for. If you're always stirring the gravel, you should either do your spring work by creating enough loose soil, or just not plant potatoes in that soil—plain and simple.
That wasn't the whole point of the discussion. I didn't discuss how many hectares to harvest. The discussion was about buying versus leasing.
Yes, and you were talking about machines going towards a million, which are only the 4-row machines. To which I replied, you could also buy a 2-row machine that costs less than half a million.
No, because then I wouldn't have been talking about almost a million if I meant a 2-row tractor. Those who buy or lease a 4-row tractor do so because the 2-row tractor doesn't have enough capacity. Not because they like to spend a lot of money. Besides, I wasn't talking about harvesters, but about harvesters.
I know of some others that would be fine with a 2-row combine but run on a 4-row. And about the last sentence: you'll need a new X9 1100 or an AF11 combine to thresh that expensive wheat costing 17 to 19 cents, yes, with those large acreages in Belgium or the Netherlands. Imagine having to combine for a week. A farmer almost never buys a new beet harvester.
Subscriber
gerard Yesterday 22:43 PM
With a 4-row truck everything has to be bigger, hall filler, dumper, tippers, you get quite a bit inside
Subscriber
Manus Yesterday 23:39 PM
It started with leasing, and you're just harping on about two drivers who can handle the work of four. Stop this!
Subscriber
frog Today 10:16 AM
Manus wrote:
It started with leasing, and you're just harping on about two drivers who can handle the work of four. Stop this!
In fact, it started with a mess in the dealer land.
Subscriber
quite coarse Today 12:44 AM
juun wrote:
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
Manus wrote:
juun wrote:
As long as you don't have to harvest 150-200 acres of potatoes, a 4-row cultivator is simply over-mechanized. Better yet, you'd squeeze 3,400 acres through a 4-row cultivator. That's what they're built for. If you're always stirring the gravel, you should either do your spring work by creating enough loose soil, or just not plant potatoes in that soil—plain and simple.
That wasn't the whole point of the discussion. I didn't discuss how many hectares to harvest. The discussion was about buying versus leasing.
Yes, and you were talking about machines going towards a million, which are only the 4-row machines. To which I replied, you could also buy a 2-row machine that costs less than half a million.
No, because then I wouldn't have been talking about almost a million if I meant a 2-row tractor. Those who buy or lease a 4-row tractor do so because the 2-row tractor doesn't have enough capacity. Not because they like to spend a lot of money. Besides, I wasn't talking about harvesters, but about harvesters.
I know of some others that would be fine with a 2-row combine but run on a 4-row. And about the last sentence: you'll need a new X9 1100 or an AF11 combine to thresh that expensive wheat costing 17 to 19 cents, yes, with those large acreages in Belgium or the Netherlands. Imagine having to combine for a week. A farmer almost never buys a new beet harvester.
The contractor is not so crazy after all
Subscriber
CM Today 13:39 AM
I don't think Manus meant at all with his talk about leasing that it was only about farmers investing. Others were taking things a bit too far in a certain direction. For now, most are keeping a tight rein on spending, but I'm seeing several tractor manufacturers trying to lure customers with five-year lease contracts at 0% interest.
Subscriber
516 Today 17:49 AM
CM wrote:
I don't think Manus meant at all with his talk about leasing that it was only about farmers investing. Others were taking things a bit too far in a certain direction. For now, most are keeping a tight rein on spending, but I'm seeing several tractor manufacturers trying to lure customers with five-year lease contracts at 0% interest.
klopt ,maar fendt (nog) niet
buffen Today 19:26 AM
we hebben het over trekker merken en geen (fendt caravans) lol
Subscriber
Jantje Today 20:05 AM
516 wrote:
CM wrote:
I don't think Manus meant at all with his talk about leasing that it was only about farmers investing. Others were taking things a bit too far in a certain direction. For now, most are keeping a tight rein on spending, but I'm seeing several tractor manufacturers trying to lure customers with five-year lease contracts at 0% interest.
klopt ,maar fendt (nog) niet
Fendt heeft zo'n hoge inruilwaarde. Die heeft dat niet nodig, hoor ik altijd.....
fiat rijder Today 20:49 AM
jantje wrote:
516 wrote:
CM wrote:
I don't think Manus meant at all with his talk about leasing that it was only about farmers investing. Others were taking things a bit too far in a certain direction. For now, most are keeping a tight rein on spending, but I'm seeing several tractor manufacturers trying to lure customers with five-year lease contracts at 0% interest.
klopt ,maar fendt (nog) niet
Fendt heeft zo'n hoge inruilwaarde. Die heeft dat niet nodig, hoor ik altijd.....
lood om oud ijzer heeft ook een veel hogere aanschaf prijs dus die vlieger gaat niet op. storingen krijg je er gratis bij....
Comment on this article

You must be logged in to respond to this article.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up