Van Dam has good news

Broader fertilizer standards for arable farming in sight

23 February 2017 - Clarisse van der Woude - 11 comments

How and when is not exactly clear on Thursday morning, but it is certain that the equivalent manure measures are really coming. This can be deduced from a statement by State Secretary Van Dam during the Agriculture and Fisheries Council on Wednesday.

"Van Dam said he had good news and that it will be published shortly," CDA Member of Parliament Jaco Geurts told IPS. Boerenbusiness† "He hasn't mentioned details, but the fact that it's coming is already a win."

Van Dam did not mention details, but the fact that it is coming is already a win

The measures should have started in 2016. The Dutch Arable Farming Union is happy that the time has finally come. 'Agricultural farmers have had to wait a long time for this. The measures are urgently needed to maintain chemical and physiological soil fertility. This is a step in the right direction', says chairman Teun de Jong.

However, details are still unclear. 'Something would still be changed and the costs for monitoring were also still under consideration,' says Geert Dubben of the NAV, who has been working on the project for years.' Dubben wants to wait for that first.

With the measures, arable farmers can achieve equal or better environmental results, which are also better suited to their business operations. By applying such a measure to arable land, a higher application standard could be applied.

Harry Kager, minerals specialist, who acted on behalf of LTO sitting on top acknowledges that it is important what the scheme looks like at a detailed level, but is positive that Van Dam has now announced its arrival. 'We are curious whether minor matters are being adjusted and whether costs are being levied, for example. We want a practical arrangement.'

By this, Kager means an arrangement that shifts from generic to specialist standards. 'That gives farmers with a higher yield the opportunity to apply more manure.' However, he also points out that if the standards had been a little higher, the equivalence would have been needed a little less. 'The crop yields used for the action program no longer correspond to current practice.

Harry Kager, specialist in minerals, who is on top of it on behalf of LTO, acknowledges that it is important how the scheme looks at a detailed level, but is positive that Van Dam has now announced its arrival. 'We are curious whether minor matters are being adjusted and whether costs are being levied, for example. We want a practical arrangement.'

By this, Kager means an arrangement that shifts from generic to specialist standards. 'That gives farmers with a higher yield the opportunity to apply more manure.' However, he also points out that if the standards had been a little higher, the equivalence would have been needed a little less. 'The crop yields used for the action program no longer correspond to current practice.'

'When it was drawn up in 2013, crop yields of 2006 were used for calculations. Since then, for example, considerable increases in yield have been achieved in sugar beet. Dutch arable farming has also experienced strong yield growth in other crops. This has led to low phosphate and low usage standards at the generic level. This can now be repaired in custom work, but it is a pity that it happened this way.'

 

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
11 comments
January 23 February 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/granen-grondstof/ artikel/10873525/Ruimere-mestnorms-arable farming-eindelijk-in-zicht]Wider manure standards for arable farming finally in sight[/url]
it would be good to use this extension for solid manure instead of slurry. to make it clear to livestock farming that there is a demand for this. who needs poison in the soil?
Jeans 23 February 2017
There should be much more space for solid manure!
Straw from the grain is used in solid manure (litter stable) and is returned to the plots via this route. Is now taxed via fertilizer legislation and standards.
bookscook 23 February 2017
I am curious whether the new regulations yield any net results, or whether there are so many rules and regulatory pressure, plus soil investigations require that the net costs are more than they yield. I fear the latter. Reducing administrative burdens and administrative burdens is nice for De Buhne, but does not work very well in the practice of LTO and Ministry. The reverse is the reality!
Subscriber
erik 23 February 2017
you forgot the nav in your summary, they were also at the table.
editor 24 February 2017
there is a bit too much cut and pasted in the article. certain paragraphs are duplicated.
bye!
little 24 February 2017
hope they don't make a difference in clay/sand, then no regulation, where the soil is most fertile, more can be fertilized already
MVG 25 February 2017
Jaco wants to score points...
info 25 February 2017
if only there were more real entrepreneurs like Jaco Geurts
Subscriber
quite coarse 26 February 2017
I'm not cheering too hard yet!
There will be unworkable conditions attached to it.
clod 26 February 2017
It will again be accompanied by many ifs and buts. The growers will again have to investigate expensive (soil) and at the end of the season all data (with accountants' statements) will have to do with it. with a lot of costs

In my opinion, the solution is simple 55 kilos of phosphate standard + the separate crop extraction, nice and simple and also well defensible
peer 27 February 2017
in 3 weeks, van dam will no longer be secretary of state, so things could change again soon, i'm betting on an election stunt by this man
xx 27 February 2017
Higher standards for higher yields sounds nice, but if you fail to harvest, you have to be doubly penalized by lower standards.
Crops with little leaching, such as winter wheat with a cruciferous green manure or early potatoes with a cruciferous green manure should actually also fall under the derogation.
You can no longer respond.

What do the current
cereal quotes?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register