Compromises are disadvantage

Arable farming happy with pro-EU course and left-wing minority

16 March 2017 - Clarisse van der Woude - 3 comments

The new cabinet to be formed does not propagate anti-EU sentiment, nor is it a dominant left bloc. This is positive for arable farming in the Netherlands, according to a telephone call among arable foremen.

LTO'er Jaap van Wenum, chairman of the arable farming department, is pleased that the parties that are critical of Europe have not become too big. 'The majority follows a pro-European course and that is important for us as an exporting sector, because the Netherlands earns a large part of its money on the European market. Then we won't benefit from fences around countries and populism.'

The fear of an anti-EU result was also part of the Dutch Arable Farming Union (NAV). 'The result could have been worse', said chairman Teun de Jong. "It looks like anti-EU clubs won't be in charge. We were afraid of that at first.' De Jong finds it encouraging that the not outspoken left will also hold sway. 'With the left you can expect a lot of pressure on environmental measures.'

A powerful minister expresses his message better

Powerful minister
The foremen think the political landscape to come is divided, but consider coalitions possible in which agriculture will play an important role. All are in favor of a minister of agriculture, because unlike a state secretary, a minister does meet weekly at the council of ministers. Van Wenum would prefer a powerful minister. “It is important to be able to address the Prime Minister directly. It is also better for a minister to convey his message to the European Union. I hope that we will have an agriculture minister who is fully committed and who represents our interests in the Netherlands and beyond.'

As an example, De Jong cites Minister Ploumen of Development Cooperation, who is part of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 'As a minister, you will then be involved in the important discussions. Such a construction is also necessary for agriculture. If possible, a minister who learns quickly and who is a good minister. Sharon Dijksma had that in him, but Martijn van Dam didn't.'

Former chairman Jaap Haanstra, who often spent time in The Hague, agrees. 'A person who finds the farmers on his or her side during the negotiations in Brussels gives the most confidence. He or she must radiate something towards agriculture, affinity or a feeling, then you can achieve things.'

The disadvantage is that many compromises between left and right will have to be made

Discussions on facts
According to Haanstra, a disadvantage is that many parties are needed to form a cabinet. 'As a result, many compromises will have to be made with left-wing and right-wing parties. The VVD may be the largest, but not huge, and a whole platoon of followers follows behind.'

He thinks a combination over the left is impossible. 'GroenLinks sees organic as the right way, an excellent sector, but that will regulate itself. That should not be regulated from above. For agriculture, a lot will depend on who comes to export and the environment.'

The most important thing for young arable farmers is that there will soon be a cabinet with which proper consultation can be held about the future. Working together constructively on the future of agriculture, says Doeko van 't Westeinde of the Dutch Agricultural Youth Contact (NAJK), who has arable farming in his portfolio. 'With this result, I think there is a good eye for agriculture. One party approaches the future in a different way than the other. I especially hope that the discussions are based on facts rather than on emotion. That way we can build a good sustainable future without being put away in a negative way.'

Read here what they think about the election results in dairy farming.

Would you like to receive more inside information about arable farming? Then take out an Arable farming subscription. Click here for more information. 

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
3 comments
Jan 18 March 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/granen-grondstof/ artikel/10873810/Akkerbouw-blij-met-pro-EU-koers-en-linkse-minderheid]Akkerbouw happy with pro-EU course and left-wing minority[/url]
One can now be delighted that the EU has been chosen, but that is not necessarily the case. The important subject of the EU has hardly been discussed, or even avoided, in the debates and media.
The much-needed discussion about the EU's shape, scale, interference and future has not been and will not be held...until the tide turns. Because if it is up to a number of parties and Brussels, they will continue on the chosen path: more integration, less national autonomy. Does arable farming really want that?
As with TTIP, it would be good if the sector/agriculture did not trudge behind a few Eurominded foremen (who became foreman on that ticket, because what to do with troublesome oncoming traffic in your board?), but that the EU (how, what, who and why) on the basis of the facts (not just the pro EU facts) is vetted out of the box. Yes we export a lot to EU countries, but export is not the only thing that counts.
For example, what has entered NL due to open borders?
What nonsense rules have been imposed?
How efficiently does the EU work and
how is the efficiency of the market frustrated by the EU regulations?
Does the EU enforce its own internal rules?
Citizens believe that agriculture receives a lot of subsidies (reputational damage), but does that also apply to agriculture in the Netherlands? etc. etc.

Why should we surrender ourselves to the CDA, VVD and D66 because of the opinion of a few leaders, who know their way around with that opinion in Brussels and The Hague. Do we want to go that way?
Once again: politicians did not want to discuss the subject of the EU in these elections (nor do they want to do so, knowing that it is a tricky subject), but believes that after this result they can make a nice decoration in the trend of: the citizen wants more EU. That is then a continuation of the popular delusion that does not need further misleading arguments. And please don't bother with the prevention of war (between F and D), because that concerned the EEG just as much.
jpk 19 March 2017
Paying higher food prices and cost to the producer is the only solution for the entire sector
Subscriber
Martian 20 March 2017
#Jan, we as arable farmers are better off with the EU than just Dutch politics.
1. Dutch politicians themselves refuse to use pots that are ready for Dutch agriculture and horticulture, and if they do make these pots available, a flood of sustainability and green requirements will come over them.
2. The customs of the Netherlands has been the most flexible with import policy and therefore bringing in diseases.
3. TTIP is not there yet, so European democracy is not affected yet. The resistance is likely to pop TTIP. Then democracy works, right?
You can only be against a trade agreement if a direction and consultation structure has been determined.
Jan 20 March 2017
@martien TTIP is frustrated by massive opposition from NGOs. LTO was certainly not one of them. LTO was squarely behind TTIP until it revealed what could be in the top hat. Then LTO's line-up changed. The foremen were wrong then too.
The NL customs have no role at all in the re-port of, for example, starting material from other EU countries. Now see the arrival of virulent nematodes from D. Control for bacterial disease from Poland and D? We'll have to see what comes out of that.
The jars from Brussels....... cigars from a box, after deduction of a generous civil servant compensation by 'the device'. Have you ever tried to participate in a fairly large tender (tender)? You need specialists (such as lobbyists), a lot of patience and paper and a form of blindness (for EU "irregularities") to find some satisfaction in that. All EU inventions that your company does not need, in addition to all the rules that affect everyone.
Why do people still believe in that totally opaque device? Because in the image that foremen, including CDA and VVD, reflect?
And those parties are now implementing that policy, even though the elections weren't about it… shouldn't be about it, because that means bullshit.
When a number of actually harmful results of the EU are mentioned, the reaction is often: yes, there are things in the EU that are not right. But never are those concrete ones made to deal with them. It may or may not be clear by now that the EU (the civil servant's equipment that actually runs the service) does not have a self-cleaning capacity.
Take the referendum on the European constitution. The opposition of the Dutch population to this was clear, wasn't it? CDA and VVD put it aside and continued as if nothing had happened. And for the time being, unless Le Pen wins, we will be stuck with these europhile leaders for a while, Wilders (I am not of that line) must first become the biggest before NL. is the EU going to tackle/leave substantially? NL can manage well without the enormous burden of southern and eastern EU member states, which is getting bigger and bigger.
You can no longer respond.

What do the current
cereal quotes?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register