Agriphoto

Inside Arable

Protein strategy launched, now the revenue model

24 December 2020 - Redactie Boerenbusiness - 8 comments

The import of cheap soy is a major barrier to the Dutch cultivation of protein-rich crops for both animal feed and human consumption. A National Protein Strategy (NES) should change that. Sector parties are positive, but insist on the revenue model.

The Dutch Arable Farming Union (NAV) largely agrees with the National Protein Strategy, the organization reports in a statement. The cultivation of protein crops offers a good opportunity to extensify the cropping plan. This has beneficial effects for the soil and biodiversity. According to the NAV, a point of concern is a sharp decrease in the balance for the farmer. That is also the immediate reason why the cultivation is difficult to get off the ground.

Give up courage
The NES is limited to matters that can be settled nationally. Many of the opportunities mentioned stand or fall with the accompanying EU policy. A level playing field is decisive for the revenue model of arable farmers who grow protein crops. 'By accepting duty-free imports as a given, it seems that Minister Schouten has already given up the courage to change this', the NAV notes. Another possibility to create a revenue model – with the coupled support within the CAP – is being brushed aside. 'The Netherlands is simply against coupled support,' says the NAV. That needs further explanation.

The introduction of import duties is not seen as a realistic solution by the Ministry of Agriculture (LNV). It is possible, however, to tighten the requirements for imported raw materials in the field of sustainability, CO2 footprint, crop protection products and more. This strengthens the level playing field for the cultivation of protein-rich crops.

Added value through local production
The ministry also sees that the supply of meat substitutes in the supermarket is increasing. Many of the raw materials come from outside the Netherlands. An additional price can be created by emphasizing regional or regional production. By placing that added value largely with the farmer, the yield of the cultivation improves.

LNV also sees an important role for breeding. Resilient varieties with a higher protein content or improved protein composition should improve their competitive position compared to soy. By marketing other parts of a crop in addition to protein, the economic base can be strengthened. A crop such as rapeseed, for example, has a protein-rich cake as a valuable by-product in addition to oil extraction.

Also opportunities for soy
Agrifirm has had experience with the cultivation of soy in the Netherlands since 2013. "The acreage has shrunk slightly in the past year, but growers continue to show interest," says Aart den Bakker, sales manager at Agrifirm. The greatest risk is the late harvest in September or October. A dry period is necessary for a good harvest.

The cultivation risk can be reduced with earlier varieties. "Steps are being made in the breeding of early varieties, but this is progressing slowly." The hectare yields are in an upward trend, with the 25% best growers making the greatest progress. Agrifirm mainly sells soy for human consumption. The added value of Dutch soy cannot be sufficiently monetized for use in animal feed.

Stefan de Ruijter, CZAV's commercial technical advisor, has noticed an increasing interest in kidney beans in his area of ​​work. In areas where irrigation is not possible, the cultivation of onions and potatoes has become risky. Brown beans can then be a nice alternative.

Field Beans Perspective
The Louis Bolk Institute sees prospects in the cultivation of field beans for the conventional agricultural sector. Protein prices in the compound feed industry are still largely based on GMO-modified soy. There are now livestock farmers who grow field beans themselves for the extraction of protein from their own land, which is also attracting a lot of interest.

In Noord-Holland, a concept was started this autumn, led by CAV Agrotheek, in which a considerable area of ​​winter field beans is grown. The aim is to sell the protein-rich bean for human consumption. The company has now found interested food companies for this.

The field bean is on the rise in the Netherlands. Last harvest year, the acreage amounted to almost 1.100 hectares, according to data from Boerenbunder.nl† The cultivation is fairly spread out in the Netherlands. Most field beans are found in Groningen (305 hectares) and North Brabant (207 hectares). In 2017, the acreage was still 566 hectares. In that year there were still 443 hectares of soy in the Netherlands, compared to 137 hectares this year. The largest protein crop in our country is alfalfa. With a total of 9.100 hectares of protein crops, cultivation takes up only 0,5% of the Dutch agricultural area.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
8 comments
Subscriber
Fortissimo 24 December 2020
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/granen-grondstof/ artikel/10890476/proteinstrategie-lanceerd-nu-het-earningmodel]Protein strategy launched, now the earnings model[/url]
It's still about balance. Many of these crops are stranded at 4 tons of gross product, are subject to many harvest risks and if the tap from Brazil and the US remains fully open for commercial reasons, it will remain with a few enthusiasts.
Subscriber
AJ van Woerkom 24 December 2020
What strikes me is that politicians and Carola are good at launching plans. She also gets worn often with vague promises.
When we see what ends up in those unrealistic marketing plans, your pants fall off.
In this, opposing interests are the spoilsport, the ecology is still subordinate to the economy.
Politics is not about words, but actions, and we must rely on government in the sense of facilitating policy.
Many issues require an integrated approach, also something in which the government falls short.
The knowledge is lacking, double agendas and parties with a mess in the reed direct his points of attention.
The sector is being handed over to the mighty financially powerful of the earth.
Few earn much and many earn little, that is the key to a shift towards ecological thinking and working. And from there the world will become healthy again, Plants, animals, people and the environment and society will become more social.
Subscriber
info 24 December 2020
There is much more behind it to produce protein. First, the climate, we can't change that. Secondly, the land price here is far too high to keep up with the cost price compared to Brazil, for example, we have to grow other crops for a cheap food package that suit the climate and the land price, which is why many lands are used for direct food production, for example potatoes, cabbages, beans, onions, etc. that was quite less in the 60s. And many lands are used NOT for food production, eg roads, houses, employment, factory site, nature, so that the ha. price has risen enormously, which is the case not only here but in the EU. The population growth is the result of this.
Subscriber
quite coarse 26 December 2020
Nice to keep importing that soy.
In many cases it is the scrap and not the bean.
Scrap is a waste product and in my opinion it is no problem to clean it up, because we also try to dispose of our waste elsewhere in the world (old iron, plastic, etc).
Where else would those countries have to go with their scrap?
After all, the bean is most commonly eaten by humans and scrap and can be converted very efficiently into meat, milk products, etc.
The protein we import is apparently cheaper than the one grown here ourselves, in peas, beans, alfalfa and other protein products.
Or there should be support for those crops from Brussels.
Maybe protein from beet leaves is something
gerard 26 December 2020
don't look at our country in France, it is possible if soy is grown there, that's good for the wheat price here
Subscriber
info 1 January 2021
France produces wheat and maize that yields more than soy and you can only use the soil once a year. In other words, cultivating the Markermeer as soon as possible for only crops that absorb CO1 that humans produce. Water absorbs 2 CO0, so it does not contribute to the environment. The number of people continues to increase, so more land must also be made available.
Subscriber
innovative 2 January 2021
you are absolutely right. but that's not going to happen. In the Netherlands, we prefer to flood entire sections again. desiccation, nature, that kind of nonsense
Subscriber
onion 2 January 2021
there is already too much land because everything that comes off yields too little so too much is produced
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Analysis Grains & raw material

Disappointing sound after marginal figure corrections

Analysis Grains & raw material

Wasde already putting US grain market on edge

Analysis Grains & Commodities

Russia is already cutting wheat export quotas

News Cereals

Record harvest of soy and corn expected in US

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register