Shutterstock

News Farmland

How long can this land price still be financed?

30 January 2019 - Anne Jan Doorn - 18 comments

Financing land is a tricky issue in agriculture. Because the land is becoming increasingly scarce, prices have risen sharply. As a result, more and more debt is needed for business succession or expansion. But, how long can this land price still be financed?

The average acreage per farm has increased in recent years from 20,3 hectares in 2000 to 32,6 hectares in 2017. The price also increased during that period, representing an increasing share of the total assets of has a company. The value of land (relative to total property) has increased on average from 35,8% in 2014 to 55,2% in 2017.

The above also means that the value of the land is becoming increasingly important for the agricultural entrepreneur. If the price of land shows a change, this has a direct effect on the owner's equity. This is striking, because the price of land has less and less to do with the yielding value of the land.

Land value becomes more important
De land price has increased considerably since 1994, while the yielding capacity has remained more or less the same. The fact that interest rates are currently low seems to be related to the rising land price rather than the yielding capital. Yet it entails a great risk: many consider land a good investment, because the price of land has been rising for a long time. Interest rates are expected to rise in the short term.

In short: where the value of the land starts to play a greater role for the entrepreneur, the investment more and more difficult† In addition, the rising land value is an increasing problem for financing; certainly in combination with the stricter requirements for banks. As a result, the banks are less willing to provide long-term loans.

Research into financeability
Boerenbusiness therefore, together with DCA-Markets, conducted a study into the financeability in the agricultural sector. Nearly 1.800 agricultural entrepreneurs took part in this survey. "The large number of respondents was completely unexpected. The fact that the subject is so alive confirms the relevance of the research," says Luc Plomp, student at Wageningen University (WUR). 

The research shows, among other things, that farmers find it more difficult to finance the succession of the farm than an acreage expansion. More than half of the respondents (52%) have experienced resistance to financing their business succession. This while 38% had resistance to the financing of an area expansion.

This is not surprising, because business succession usually involves more factors and higher amounts. Nevertheless, the outcome that great resistance is experienced in financing business succession is worrisome; certainly when looking at the large group of successors and continuity of the sector. It also appears that the entity of the company has an influence on the resistance: a sole proprietorship experiences more resistance than, for example, a partnership.

There is more resistance to the financing of business successions than to expansion of acreage.

Confidence in the future
Nevertheless, a large part of the respondents indicate that they have confidence in future financing. About 45% expect to experience (very) little resistance with financing in the future. The other side of the coin, however, is that 33% indicate that they expect resistance when it comes to financing, among other things, business succession or acreage expansion. 

It is striking that the farmers with a lot of property rights expect that they will be able to expand with property land in the future. On the other hand, the tenants see lease as the most realistic option for expanding. This shows a clear difference in mentality between the tenant farmers and the farmers who own a lot. 

Return leading in financing
In addition, the research shows that the expected return is often the most important problem in getting financing. About 33% of the respondents indicated that the expected return was a bottleneck. At the same time, the farmers have the idea that if they have sufficient equity capital, they can invest well in land. This is because its value continues to rise.

However, the lender's view is different. As an example we take a company of 20 hectares where the land has been almost completely repaid. If that farmer applies for €100.000 financing for a 4-hectare plot, and pays the majority himself, then the farmer's mindset is that there is sufficient equity. However, the financier calculates differently. He wonders whether the return of the company will be increased by the purchase of those 4 hectares. And the answer to that is ultimately leading.

This is the first article in a series in which the results of the research of Boerenbusiness and DCA Markets. The topics that will be discussed include: the feasibility of growing in owned land, the expectation of the land price and investing in land. 

The results of the survey are also presented in a fact sheet. This can be downloaded here. Boerenbusiness Thank you to the agricultural entrepreneurs who completed the survey.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Anne-Jan Doorn

Anne Jan Doorn is an arable expert at Boerenbusiness. He writes about the various arable farming markets and also focuses on the land and energy market.
Comments
18 comments
hans 30 January 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/grond/ artikel/10881186/hoelang-is-this-grondprijs-nog-te-finance]How long can this land price still be financed?[/url]
" As an example, let's take a 20-hectare company where the land has been almost completely repaid. If that farmer applies for €100.000 financing for a 4-hectare plot, and pays the largest part himself, then the thinking of the farmer that there is sufficient equity. However, the financier calculates differently, because he wonders whether the return of the company will be increased by purchasing those 4 hectares. And the answer to that is ultimately leading."

What a cool.
As if in this case the bank as a nanny puts your results first.
Of course not.
The interest of a bank is the profit of the bank.
So a well-insured loan is cash for the bank.
Subscriber
piet 30 January 2019
Or the bank thinks it is no longer a well-insured loan, because they are no longer so sure of the land price.
hans 30 January 2019
Piet, 100.000 euro loan on 24 ha.
4000 per hectare.
How much security do you want??
Would they rather speculate on the stock market, or would they rather buy "securities" in the US? Your bank's investment "specialists"? Pay like a prince, wit like a headless chicken, risk to the citizen.
Subscriber
Spike 30 January 2019
Well, people wake up.
Already warned about this problem 10 years ago, but this was ridiculed by everyone.
The succession at a good and profitable property company will become a mega problem (if there are several children) and will see that this will lead to multi Nationals who will take on the agricultural production through a boss or it will become a form of family lease that I rely on I've never seen much good from the long run either.
Time for politicians to take a stand on whether agricultural land is seen as a means of production or an investment.
hans 30 January 2019
The bank determines the price of the land.
The farmer wants to buy something, and asks the bank what he can offer.
Prefer something more, then you're bacon buyer.

And then expand again, to pay your debts.
Taking advantage of the more expensive land as collateral.
And the ballasting is already measured by not including land in the wealth tax.

Taking advantage of expensive land, but still something to complain about.

With a normal company size, a profitable business, and indeed just pay taxes from time to time, you can just keep your company in your family.
Subscriber
3897 30 January 2019
10 million people are added every 1 years. Households with fewer people, more asphalt, more nature and an interest rate that simply cannot become normal for the time being. How many more arguments do you need to understand that the land will simply never get cheap again. Of course it is only a small group that can buy, but it has always been that way. Most land is sold within the family for a price that it can be continued, so supply on the free market is and remains little, so scarce, so expensive.
Jan 31 January 2019
A lot of offer here and there will be a lot more in the coming years
Flevoland 2 February 2019
Jan wrote:
A lot of offer here and there will be a lot more in the coming years
Where is Jan here? In Flevoland I see little offer.
Subscriber
Skirt 2 February 2019
Flevoland is a special case, but who wants to live there with dozens of planes every day right over your roof from Lelystad. Good luck over there!
hans 2 February 2019
Airplanes, the polluters of our environment, 90% unnecessary.

Almost all intercontinental flight movements starting in Europe call at Schiphol, just to fill their tank cheaply.
No employment, no tax revenue, just a nuisance, but great for the royal family, who can reap the necessary dividend through Shell.

In addition, flying is only interesting for the Dutch because transport by road or rail is disproportionately taxed, but flying, although much more polluting, remains unburdened.

The Netherlands, tax haven and environmental waste pit of Europe.

And then a government that still talks about who should pay for the sustainability transshipment: the citizen.
Ton Westgeest 2 February 2019
Yes, let's start with sustainability. Bought solar panels seven years ago, without subsidy, simply for the sake of innovation. Now with all those sickening subsidies. Land sky high... because solar farms had to be built, and we can no longer lose the power to the grid. Money laundering with windmills and solar farms from taxpayers' money. On a roll!
Land price is best to be financed....., but not for agriculture here in the Netherlands
Henk 4 February 2019
If you make some cycling routes with the nice weather, you will see how much land has gone to nature. Why all the neglect of good farmland?
On the other hand is the bad position of the farmer! The food is underpaid! The banks are dropping the farmers!! Companies with large stables are at a loss! It clears and becomes a drama. One person can go even further.
Subscriber
Farmer Jan 4 February 2019
Meanwhile, the agricultural sector is being eroded, and is under great pressure to produce mainly at low costs, while the acreage is decreasing every day. Land is no longer cheap in the Netherlands.

See below from CBS publication Dec 2018.

Between 2012 and 2015, 11 thousand hectares of open natural terrain were added in the Netherlands. The area of ​​open wet natural terrain in particular increased. The built-up area also continued to grow, mainly due to an increase in residential and commercial land. Recreational areas and inland waterways are also gaining ground. The agricultural area decreased the most with 15 thousand hectares. Statistics Netherlands (CBS) reports this on the basis of new figures on land use in the Netherlands.

Agricultural land in particular was given a different use: more than 15 thousand hectares of agricultural and horticultural land were given a different use. This means that on an average day about 14 hectares have been removed from agriculture, an area comparable to 28 football fields. This picture has hardly changed in the last thirty years. 1,5 thousand hectares of building land, previously often agricultural land, was also given a new use.
hans 4 February 2019
Farmer Jan, 15.000 ha less agr. land, on a total of almost 2.000.000 ha.
Less than 1%.

Do you know how many farmers do not wish to, or will soon actually stop, preferably also at a cost-effective reasonable price?
xx 4 February 2019
That 14 ha per day was in the crisis years. Now it is already moving towards 40 ha per day that is being withdrawn from agriculture.
The price of land will probably drop a bit in the coming years, but in 10 years it will be considerably more expensive.
hans 4 February 2019
Yes xx, I think so too.

But everything else is much more expensive.
Henk 4 February 2019
Hobby can cost what, right?
james john 9 February 2019
Hello sir / Madam.:
Getting a legitimate mortgage has always been a big problem for customers who have a financial problem and need a solution for it. The issue of credit and collateral is something that customers always worry about when they want to take out a mortgage with a legitimate lender. But... we've made that difference in the lending industry. We can arrange a mortgage from 5000. to 100.000.1000 in the currencies of USD, EURO and Pounds
Our services include the following:
debt consolidation
Second Mortgage
business loans
Personal Loans
International Loans
Loan for all types
Family mortgage
ET C
No social security and no credit check, 100% guarantee. All you have to do is let us know exactly what you want and we will definitely make your dream come true. MR STEVE. say yes when your banks say no. Finally, we finance small mortgage companies, intermediaries, small scale financial institutions, because we have unlimited capital. For more information on how to get a mortgage contact us, Please respond immediately to this EMAIL: john.info255@yandex.com
Whatsapp: +380994169405
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Opinions Paul & Joost Bakker

Production or landscape turns land market upside down

News Farmland

NAJK positive but critical about revision of tenancy law

News Farmland

Grassland becomes 10.000 euros more expensive per hectare in one year

News Farmland

Grassland rises above 100.000 euros per hectare

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up