Agriphoto

News Crop protection

Glyphosate ban in lease contract illegal

3 February 2020 - Thomas Doornbos - 8 comments

The Municipality of Gilze en Rijen in North Brabant will appeal against a decision of the Ground Chamber. The municipality had included a ban on glyphosate in the lease for municipal land. The Ground Chamber has quashed this demand.

The Ground Chamber tests and assesses lease agreements in the Netherlands. This also applies to the municipal leases of Gilze and Rijen. The leased land of the municipality is intended for the construction of houses or businesses in the future. As long as there are no concrete building plans, the land will be leased to farmers.

No glyphosate requirements
In the lease agreements for 2020, the municipality has included that farmers are not allowed to use the herbicide glyphosate. The Ground Chamber has decided to quash this demand. The decision states that: "The ban on the use of glyphosate restricts the tenant's freedom of exploitation too much." The municipality of Gilze en Rijen does not agree with this and will appeal.

Striking detail: At the same time, Staatsbosbeheer decided to also impose a glyphosate ban on 40.000 hectares of leased land. Carola Schouten, Minister of LNV, announced this in a Letter to Parliament.

Can ambition last?
Staatsbosbeheer tries to reduce the use to 2 within 0 years. The new leases to be drawn up include the requirement that the use of glyphosate is in principle prohibited. Current contracts - in which the drug may still be used - will be phased out. The question now is whether this requirement can stand, bearing in mind the decision of the Ground Chamber.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
8 comments
jpkievit 3 February 2020
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/grond/ artikel/10885749/glyphosate prohibition-in-pachtcontract-onwetelijk]Glyphosate prohibition in lease contract is illegal[/url]
It has been scientifically proven that glyphosate is 100% safe when applying the manufacturer's instructions for use that the GBM agent is never carcinogenic.
common sense 3 February 2020
It is better to have this drug in your body rather than not?
Subscriber
yay 3 February 2020
which remedy?
common sense 4 February 2020
Which drug do you want to take the risk do you mean?

None.

This twist to comfortable truth still works for those who are allowed to smoke as long as they pay.
Subscriber
pieter 4 February 2020
people would rather go for poison at the pharmacy than get a crop protection agent
Hans 21 February 2020
Monsanto/Bayer/singenta.
When you pick up a medication at the pharmacy, it usually says Bayer on the box.
The pesticide producer sprays it on your food and you get sick from it, then you have to try to fight the poison with the poison from the pharmacy from the other side.
Crazy that there is so much cancer? No, it's all been investigated, I hear you say
Subscriber
quite coarse 21 February 2020
So the bio food eaters don't get cancer??
Gerrit 21 February 2020
If the pension funds have shares in it, you have to be careful, so you have stopped smoking, with G5 we cannot escape it.

Lobbyists are the tilers to hell from the right,
indicated by left.

natural phenomenon among people, call it market forces
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Arable

German farmers fear huge yield losses

News Ground

Tenants feel ignored during relocation

News Potatoes

Disappearance of Talent a bloodletting for the sector

Background Crop protection

'Ctgb passed over in ruling on lily cultivation'

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register