Shutterstock

News Land market

LTO: Developing agricultural land in the North Sea

5 March 2021 - Redactie Boerenbusiness - 14 comments

LTO Nederland advocates thorough research into the extraction of new land in the Netherlands for agricultural development, for example in the North Sea. There, space can be made for modern high-tech sectors with high added value, such as new forms of livestock farming, seed potato cultivation, vegetables, flowers and bulbs. 

'These sectors are in need of that and can give innovation impulses to the entire sector. This offers a unique opportunity to strengthen the special international position of the Netherlands as an innovative agricultural and horticultural country writes LTO in its Ground Vision 2021 published this morning (Friday 5 March). 

The Netherlands has a long history of land reclamation, but it has now been over 50 years since the last polder was reclaimed. New land should ease the current pressure on open space, LTO emphasizes, which could have a beneficial effect on land prices. "But the reclaimed land does not only have to be used for agricultural purposes. Urban planning, recreation, nature and biodiversity can also benefit from it." A survey among its members shows that 45% of agricultural entrepreneurs are in favor of land reclamation at sea.

Half of farmers want more land
LTO Nederland argues in the vision for more agricultural land in the Netherlands. With this, the organization wants to reverse a trend that has been going on for years. Every year, an average of 8.000 hectares of agricultural land in our country is used for another purpose. In the last 70 years, 500.000 hectares of agricultural land have been lost, leaving about 1,8 million hectares. While according to a survey among LTO members, more than half of the farmers and horticulturists need more land, while only 5% want to sell or lease land.

'There is nothing to indicate that these claims for housing and infrastructure will decrease in the coming years. According to recent reports, up to a million new homes are needed by 2030. At the same time, it is becoming clear that social wishes with regard to nature, biodiversity and climate demand more instead of less land,' LTO writes in the vision. 

Limit calving agricultural area
In the vision, LTO makes a series of proposals to limit the current erosion of agricultural land. In doing so, the government must get rid of the 'social routine of looking directly at agricultural land in spatial plans.' The agricultural and horticultural organization states, among other things, that proposals for a different use of agricultural land must be accompanied by area compensation. Also, any space claim must first be searched for land that is already owned by the government.

Furthermore, in urban development, one must first look at infill, i.e. building within the existing urban or village contours. Solar parks on fertile farmland should be banned. According to LTO, they are 'an unnecessary attack on the available agricultural and horticultural acreage. They also drive up land and lease prices.'

Rewarding additional nutrition for land use
In the land vision, LTO also makes proposals for multiple land use, in which agricultural entrepreneurs combine the cultivation of crops on their land with the fulfillment of social goals in the field of nature, climate and biodiversity. LTO mentions nature-inclusive agriculture, water storage and forestry as examples. These kinds of measures should not be mandatory, according to LTO, because they undermine the revenue model and the competitive position of the Dutch farmer on the European market. The organization suggests that compensation should come from society for this.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
14 comments
info 5 March 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/grond/artikel/10891287/lto-landbouwgrond-ontdeveloped-in-de-noordzee]LTO: Developing agricultural land in the North Sea[/url]
We can realize agricultural land by draining the Markerwaard and to build the 1 million houses in the sea with the necessary nature around it that one can enjoy without driving far in front with that polluting carriage would be a good solution, then Can we sell the plots that are now being bought up by the provinces for nature use back to the farm?
There is also a solution for the home seeker, now it is always the fight for farmland to convert it for housing, which causes the farmer a lot of suffering.
Subscriber
frog 6 March 2021
I am especially curious about the nitrogen emissions from reclamations
6 March 2021
https://www.nieuweoogst.nl/nieuws/2020/03/02/ontpoldering-hedwigepolder-na-jarenlange-strijd-van-start

The waterbed effect.
Kees 6 March 2021
There are more important issues for advocates to deal with. It would be nice if farmers also earn some money. It should be a revenue model for everyone, not just the periphery. They now earn at the expense of the primary sector. The current model leaves farmers with the failure costs of related companies (the periphery).
The periphery always earns, for them mass is cash. For farmers, too little cash register due to too much mass. This leads to conflicting interests. The periphery buys and/or starts up companies by means of front men and in this way keeps the volume produced artificially high. With this they have turned off the price mechanism/pork cycle.
The money that is now being earned should be distributed much better. that will lead to competitive cost prices. Farmers have an excellent bargaining position, the periphery desperately needs the primary sector to make money (read link below). Yet we have been pushed into a submissive position. Because we are always distracted looking for higher returns in the wrong places. The periphery that complains about the disappearance of 'critical' masses due to, for example, warm remediation, but it is better to settle for less and swallow less family assets of hard-working entrepreneurs (which are then invested abroad). So that those entrepreneurs receive at least a little more than a minimal reward for their work.

Perhaps we should not look for the return in the market (yield prices). But approach It a bit more commercially and realize how important it is for the periphery (we are indispensable). We facilitate the revenue model for the periphery and that is quite welcome. All we get in return is criticism. Look at the nitrogen file, piglet mortality, and the story about the fraud involving overproduction of pigs. Farmers are blamed while others make big money off it. We produce according to production methods that yield the most money for others.
Kees 6 March 2021
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://edepot.wur.nl/342807&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwj148_bspvvAhXICOwKHcjqDjcQFjAAegQICBAB&usg=AOvVaw0l3xn_EGZiIfex-xDPSnC4

https://www.wur.nl/nl/Publicatie-details.htm?publicationId=publication-way-343838323430
6 March 2021
Our financially strong related companies and chain partners invest heavily in production in our sales markets and with our competitors. This threatens the future prospects and competitive position of Dutch farmers. 'Farmers' advocates can put the political sticker supplied by the wealthy affiliate on it, but that does not change this situation. Sales markets for Dutch farmers will disappear as a result of this development.
(example, google: Investing in the pig column in Hungary, Romania, Ukraine and Russia) (example, google: Sector-Study-Pig-Chain-Argentina-2020) download the survey.
Subscriber
January 6 March 2021
we better develop a city in the North Sea
then the farmers can stay where they are
Subscriber
pieter 6 March 2021
Markerwaard back on the map which party also agrees with this?
Subscriber
onion 6 March 2021
there is already too much land almost of every product there are surpluses the only thing you have to do in the north sea is build an airport
Island 6 March 2021
if we just keep the sea for the fishermen, build in fake nature reserves and leave the farmers where they are, all problems will be solved
clod 7 March 2021
pieter wrote:
Markerwaard back on the map which party also agrees with this?
Creating a new city in the Markerwaard is a good option and also building a new nuclear power plant immediately, after all, then you will also largely be rid of the CO2 and nitrogen problem!!!

Because the energy transition in this form is doomed to fail because in the future every household will have to cough up +\- 5000 euros per year (source Telegraaf) to be able to meet the sustainability obligation.







Subscriber
Skirt 7 March 2021
LTO could better propose that all farmers emigrate tax-free if they want to. This immediately frees up space.
Subscriber
peta 7 March 2021
@Kjol; LTO is just smart enough not to immediately undermine their own revenue model. They are working on it in a roundabout way, but they don't realize it yet.
Subscriber
mafex 9 March 2021
that LTO, does it still exist?
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Background Farmland

Is agricultural malaise taking hold of the land market?

News Farmland

Rabo Transition Fund passes the billion mark, bulk goes to land

News Farmland

Building land prices shoot up in third quarter

News Arable

England's largest arable farmer shrinks by a fifth

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Register