Lawyers sharpen the knives

Weaknesses of phosphate and LSU found

14 February 2017 - Redactie Boerenbusiness - 11 comments

Slowly but surely, the phosphate reduction plan is taking shape. Because more and more is becoming established, lawyers can also start to take stock and investigate where they can assist entrepreneurs. In particular, the reference date, which has often been identified as the weak spot, appears to be fodder for lawsuits.    

Adverse effects

A well-known name in agricultural law is France Damen. It announces that it is already investigating the opportunities offered by a case against the regulation for the shrinkage of Large Livestock Units (LSU) and, by extension, the phosphate rights. Although the scheme is not yet complete. We still have to wait for the guarantee. This will take place via a ministerial regulation, based on Article 13, and is expected in mid-February.

It is clear that the LU scheme has negative consequences for many companies. As a result, entrepreneurs have been looking at possibilities to sue the state ever since Sharon Dijksma announced the introduction of phosphate rights. Something that is partly fueled by the fact that politicians first focused on limiting growth via land, but only opted for a different brake on growth at a too late stage.

An attempt is now being made to bring phosphate production under the ceiling again by means of the LU scheme, the feed track and reduction of the dairy herd. The phosphate rights will follow on 1 January 2018. The reference date of 2 July 2015 is important for these schemes. 'This means that the objections to the LU scheme for some companies are related to the objections to the allocation of phosphate rights.'

Damen writes that various legal specializations come together in this file, such as agricultural law, administrative law, competition law and cooperative law. Damen does not specify the exact possibilities, but due to the reach of the file, it can be argued that it is impossible to prevent lawsuits.  

 

   

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
11 comments
Farm man 14 February 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk-voer/ artikel/10873400/Weak spot-van-phosphate-en-GVE-gevonden--]Weak spot of phosphate and GVE found[/url]
A farmer with a lawyer always loses from the government rules!!!
HD 14 February 2017
It is the lawyers who are going to earn from this, not the farmer
boer 14 February 2017
Of course, every farmer is assured of legal aid.
This monstrosity can't stand
appie 14 February 2017
We'd rather milk each other into the ground than use our brains.
Stupid stupid stupid.
Yup 14 February 2017
Totally agree app
Rabo 14 February 2017
Yes, sue the state, just like the water boards in Limburg
Farmer Joop 17 February 2017
Only 1 good arrangement is possible And that is paid by the polluter, so whoever has enough land must stay completely out of harm's way. So don't be limited in the possibility to keep more cows !!!!! Seems logical to me.
FarmerM 18 February 2017
Completely agree farmer Joop!
The Hague is completely crooked, and is destroying the sector in this way.
In the big cities, citizens are already starting to look pretty badly at the current "increasingly intensive and polluting" dairy farming. An acquaintance of mine works in the hospital in Rotterdam, but when a dairy farmer or pig farmer comes in, it's not much nicer to talk about than about a criminal from prison...
The Hague should have linked phosphate rights to space (and practical sales)
Arable farms were then stimulated to supply healthier manure for the soil (artificial fertilizer only depletes the soil), manure processors were stimulated more (should also be given rights to processing process guidelines) and the market would sustain itself.
Link actual production to actual sales.
In the calculations in which derogation loss is so disastrous for the sector, they forget that a lot of costs are already incurred for something uncertain, and a large part of the manure disposal costs flows back into the sector to the recipients of manure.
We are now helping the companies that process manure or are trying to set up this (and are just getting started)...
Nice job drivers...
lawyer peter 18 February 2017
totally agree Joe.
there are 2 possibilities:

Those who want to participate in the derogation (1-230 kilos of nitrogen per hectare from animal manure) fall under the LU phosphate reduction scheme, they also benefit economically from this. This group therefore wants to keep more LUs per hectare.
2 the other group falls under 170 kilos of nitrogen per hectare from animal manure.
The judge will therefore have to rule on this.
lawyer peter 18 February 2017
you cannot deprive a group of dairy farmers of a right of ownership (Permitted situation (environmental permit, NB permit) and/or many more animals in 2014 than on 2 July 2015 reference date, for whatever reason) in favor of another person who, as a result, retains the derogation ( installation space) and economic gain.

This is contrary to a general order for good governance.

Here too, a judge will have to rule.
Hans 21 February 2017
Boy, are the lawsuits starting again.
Actually, I don't want to hear that whining at all.
We just have to cut down on those cows.
And then those so-called well-working farmers, who have covered everything with soil.
A cow is a roughage eater, so..., whether you own the land for the feed or buy the feed from someone else, it doesn't matter.
Stop whining,...4% fewer animals and a much higher chance that there is still margin left.
Don't just work hard, think too!
Considering Trump 12 April 2017
Burning everything down there in the hedge, a bunch of drunk and stuffed dictators, bomb on it and sand on it!
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

News Milk

Phosphate trade to have peak year in 2024

News phosphate

Phosphate market slowly becoming slightly more volatile

Analysis Phosphate

Phosphate copper starts looking beyond annual boundaries

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register