No shrinkage of beef cattle

Phosphate reduction regulation adjusted again

12 April 2017 - Esther de Snoo - 14 comments

Beef farmers and other non-dairy farms will not have to remove any animals this year. This is apparent from a newly announced amendment proposal for the phosphate reduction scheme that was announced by outgoing State Secretary Martijn van Dam on Wednesday, 12 April. 

The new bill shows that beef farmers and other non-supplying cattle farms will be completely excluded from the scheme. They are therefore not obliged to remove animals this year. 

Van Dam reverses the measure within 2 months

Rollback measure
Initially, the phosphate reduction plan did not apply to non-dairy farms. There was therefore a fear that the success of the phosphate reduction plan could be jeopardized if this category of companies were not caught. This arose after signals from the sector that non-dairy farms could be 'used' to house livestock, so that they would be excluded from the scheme. To close this gap in the scheme, Van Dam announced in February that beef farmers, like dairy farmers, will be fined if the number of female animals in 2017 exceeds the number of I&R registered animals on December 15, 2017. Van Dam is now running this measure again. back. 

Beef farmers did not contribute to phosphate exceedance

Wish beef farmers
With the amendment to the law, Van Dam is giving in to the wishes of beef farmers. They became in February surprised by the phosphate reduction plan that suddenly turned out to apply to them as well. The beef farmers are on this went to court† They believe that they have not contributed any amounts to the exceeding of the phosphate ceiling. 

Unclear
The ink of the agreements that have been put on paper about the mixed companies is still wet. The Ministry of Economic Affairs and the LTO department of veal calves have recently made agreements on how to deal with mixed companies that keep veal calves and dairy cattle. It is not yet clear what the amendment will mean for these agreements. 

The details of the change will be announced before May 1, according to the ministry. 

Read also Hole in phosphate plan seems difficult to close

Read here the letter from Martijn van Dam of Wednesday 12 April

Want to follow more news and developments about dairy farming? Then take out a Milk & Feed Pro subscription. 

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
14 comments
piet 12 April 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk-voer/ artikel/10874109/Phosphate reduction scheme-opnieuw-adapted]Phosphate reduction scheme adjusted again[/url]
many meat farmers have started with the money from quota sold
then in meat cattle to avoid the tax
and now the dairy farmer can pay for the consequences
cattle pasture 12 April 2017
we have not grown in animal numbers, so we have not contributed to the phosphate surplus either, but must shrink, so you will have payment problems, think that Martijn will not be able to explain that clearly, so this means that the non-growers have to shrink even more in order to fulfill this agreement. compensate, is the lto also going to affect this?
Edwin Heydra 12 April 2017
Dear Pete
There are pills for such stupid statements.
Joop 12 April 2017
Since when do bulls not produce phosphate????? Phosphate does not only come from dairy cattle Maybe the dairy farmers should start a lawsuit at the European Court against this unequal treatment There are plenty of farmers who are even allowed to supply manure under the Manure Act but are not allowed to keep the cows themselves DISGUSTING!
Kidney 12 April 2017
This adjustment is simply because they are afraid of the lawsuits coming to court today and tomorrow. But with a bit of luck, the judge will make mincemeat of the whole nonsensical stupid phosphate reduction plan that makes no sense!!! Too bad about the already removed cows. Just throw in a claim for damages then!!! If the lawyers do their job well, the reduction plan will be canceled in May! RIGHTLY, I've rarely seen a dumber plan than this! Whoever makes that up must ask himself whether he is in the right mind!
harry 12 April 2017
Dear Pete.
Why didn't you sell your milk quota? then you could also have benefited according to your reasoning.
a. 12 April 2017
And what will it be like for a farmer with a small dairy branch and many suckler cows? slaughter, fines, or go to court? The milk price of all those cows is not much higher, the prices for slaughter cattle are much lower, thanks to the milk cooperatives that had to lead the way if necessary.
has 12 April 2017
coop. lto bank, were all nervous in coming up with the rules.
I hope the judge reverses them, or there's no derogation, then we get justice again.
aunt saar 12 April 2017
What a bullshit dude, everyone is free to choose, that quota is then sold very far before abolition, when it still yielded money, so not with premeditated guesses anyway, do you know who to curse at? To you LTO foremen, one of which is also here, and went from 2015 to 160 cows before June 400. Those are the causes of all misery, but I don't hear you about that
aunt saar 12 April 2017
What a bullshit dude, everyone is free to choose, that quota is then sold very far before abolition, when it still yielded money, so not with premeditated guesses anyway, do you know who to curse at? To you LTO foremen, one of which is also here, and went from 2015 to 160 cows before June 400. Those are the causes of all misery, but I don't hear you about that
frits 12 April 2017
I think those farmers who have applied for the MB law for 2015 and have taken good care of each other are allowed to keep the animals and who do not have that, too bad a barn of 400 cows built in 2016 with MB from before 2015 you can just keep the cows you have built in 2012 for 400 cows and no MB law then you have to sit on the blisters too bad you knew you had to you can not let a cattle farmer pay who adheres neatly to the rules
mores 13 April 2017
indeed many large growers from before 2 July 2015 do not have an NB permit and are not cut, while farmers grown after 2 July with a valid Nb license are cut and disproportionately large
Kees 13 April 2017
They have to bring the date of July 2 2 weeks forward, then you can at least tackle the farmers with insider information who brought in full trucks of cows from neighboring countries on June 30. Where does that inside information come from? were and have a noose by these companies??
kalf 19 April 2017
Kees is absolutely right. I know people who have rented empty stables to have them filled with trucks full at the same time on those last days. WHERE does this foreknowledge come from? WHY is this not investigated.
mdb 19 April 2017
Because the whole thing stinks on all sides!!

The normal dairy farmer has to bleed for those sick farms, big bigger, and no turning back!
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register