In phosphate reduction plan

Appeal decision on October 31

19 September 2017 - Bart-Jan van Zandwijk - 3 comments

The ruling in the appeal, filed by former State Secretary Martijn van Dam, against the court's decision on the phosphate reduction plan is expected on October 31. The hearing took place on Monday, September 18.

The phosphate reduction plan was born on May 4 suspended by the preliminary relief judge for 52 dairy farmers. The State appealed against this. 

Foreseeability was discussed

Foreseeability up for discussion
According to Marieke Toonders, lawyer at Linssen cs Lawyers, few new cases were reported during the session on September 18. Foreseeability was discussed. The dairy farmers indicated that the scheme was not foreseeable. They have in fact invested on the basis of the existing 'Land-bound Growth Act'. Eventually they were prevented from keeping the extra animals.

The State indicates that the dairy farmers could have foreseen this coming. They knew that the phosphate ceiling was being exceeded and they expanded after all.

Good foundation
The preliminary relief judge in The Hague has ruled that the Agriculture Act does provide a good basis for the regulation. Toonders: "We have again indicated that this cannot serve as a legal basis for the phosphate reduction plan."

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
3 comments
andre vw 19 September 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk-feed/ artikel/10875921/uitspraak-hoger-beroep-op-31-october][/url]
The case that Van Dam has brought is still before the court, and he has already indicated during these proceedings that it is all the dairy farmers' own fault.
So for the judge a shot at open goal.
mores 19 September 2017
In the spring of 2015, Van Dam wrote a letter to the House of Representatives stating that the government could not foresee an exceedance of the phosphate ceiling. How could a livestock farmer foresee this?
anton 19 September 2017
Easy for the judge, according to Brussels, the Netherlands must submit a good phosphate ceiling to be eligible for derogation, so the judge rejects all arguments from the farmers, who knew at the time that the ceiling would be violated.
Subscriber
Ronnie 19 September 2017
If exceeded, we might lose the derogation. A dairy farmer could not have foreseen that we would then have a quota system. At that time, the policy bosses were still celebrating because of the so-called liberation day. No more quota, no more investing in air, free market forces, everyone has to take care of their own manure sales, ensure more land-relatedness, pay attention to grazing.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register