News phosphate rights

EU still responds to bottlenecks

12 July 2018 - Herma van den Pol - 6 comments

The emergency questions asked by Annie Schreijer-Pierik, CDA Member of the European Parliament, about the bottlenecks in dairy farming have yet to be answered by Brussels. In an early response, Brussels already announced that this was a Dutch issue, but Schreijer-Pierik calls that an open door.

To prevent sustainable family businesses from failing, Schreijer-Pierik is investigating the options for a temporary exemption. The condition for this is that the total manure production ceiling is not compromised. Schreijer-Pierik draws attention to this by means of written questions to the European Commission (EC). The answers must be given within 21 days (so no later than 24 July).

Last straw?
She shoots the group of approximately 800 dairy farmers to help those who otherwise cannot survive. This is due to the phosphate rights system, which came into effect on 1 January 2018. A bottleneck scheme has been set up within the system, but this is very limited and does not apply, for example, to the latent stable space.

Only help when Dutch politicians decide to intervene

Farm reported on Wednesday 11 July that Brussels considers this a Dutch issue. This means that help will only come when Dutch politicians decide to intervene. "That's an open door," says Pierik. "This limited communication does not change that. It is by no means an official answer to my very specific urgent questions to the European Commission."

Schreijer-Pierik says that the EC must indicate whether the proposed options are permissible and possible. Otherwise, they must indicate whether there are other options for the Netherlands, if they remain within the framework of the derogation decision and state aid regulations. "It will then be up to the Dutch government and the members of the House of Representatives to take concrete decisions about a solution to the problem."

Utilization of other phosphate space
What are Schreijer-Pierik's proposals? "I want possibilities for utilizing the remaining phosphate space in general, but also specifically for the warm remediation of pig farming. This in combination with limited skimming of residues or through a limited, temporary exchange between the sectors." These are good possibilities, because the state aid rules often do not apply when additional environmental benefits can be achieved, Pierik supports her proposals. 

Carola Schouten, Minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, gave during the last phosphate debate to go to Brussels again to find out what can be done about the bottlenecks. However, it was clear from her words that there is only a small chance that anything can be done at all. Perhaps Schreijer-Pierik can set something in motion.

Click here to view the emergency questions.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Herman van den Pol

Herma van den Pol has been with us since 2011 Boerenbusiness and has developed over the years into a market expert Milk & Feed. In addition, she can be seen weekly in the market flash about the dairy market.
Comments
6 comments
Jan4072 14 July 2018
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk-voer/ artikel/10879243/eu-komen-nog-met-response-op-knelbollen][/url]
So she wants to reduce the number of pigs in order to maintain the number of cows? Nice try, but when this is over, the nitrate in the groundwater story reappears and the cows have to clear the field after all. I rather think that the bank directors have been with her. As it stands, the 800 bottlenecks are mainly expansion cases and heavily financed by the banks. If they fall, the banks will have a loss of billions.
geert 21 July 2018
Rabobank CEO Ruud Huirne saw this coming, he himself sat at the table with the minister to decide on the phosphate rights. can now solve the problems for the bottlenecks
Huug 22 July 2018
Hypocritical folks, can you imagine how underhanded they are pfhhh bah
cowbur 22 July 2018
Even in the worst year of the year, less than 10 pig farmers went bankrupt. Due to its duty of care, the bank always solves the problem correctly, unless the farmer commits fraud. For example, of the 800 bankrupts among the cow farmers, there will be hardly any bankruptcies. Please note that after settlement you are left with no more than a rented house and you have to work for a boss. However, there is nothing wrong with that, 15 million fellow countrymen have to do that too.
Huug 22 July 2018
Koeboer wants you so badly to have success, that will be done with communications.
hans 22 July 2018
Koeboer, "The bank always solves it correctly because of its duty of care", yes, nice.
Set up a stable for well over a million, your land as collateral, and when the going gets tough, sell the lot. Stole for 50 grand, your land for what the bank agrees to (don't directly endanger the buyer). You left with nothing in a rented house, gone land, gone business. Not bankrupt, but gambled everything. Why duty of care?
Peters 22 July 2018
How many people and companies went bankrupt during the crisis years? Still in debt restructuring. A rented house, crying and a blank start is pure luxury by comparison.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

Analysis phosphate

Phosphate trade heads for unusually quiet finale

Analysis Milk

Dairy farmers in doubt about phosphate rights

News Milk

Phosphate trade to have peak year in 2024

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up