Shutterstock

Background Ko-Calf

Phosphate rights lead to sad end of Ko-Kalf

1 April 2019 - Wouter Baan - 21 comments

The company Ko-Kalf from the Gelderse Doornspijk is for sale. The company switched to organic dairy cattle in 2015, but due to a shortage of phosphate rights, owner Ko van Twillert is now putting the whole thing up for sale. "I am one of the worst victims of the phosphate rights system."

Ko-Kalf was founded about 20 years ago by real estate entrepreneur Ko van Twillert. With a passion for organic (dairy) livestock farming, he started his own beef cattle branch of the 'Blonde d'Aquitaines' breed and this meat was sold through its own label. Ko-Kalf also provided group tours, so many people have seen the stables with their own eyes over the years.

"The company was transformed into an organic dairy farm in 2015, because the beef cattle branch could not be made profitable in the end," Van Twillert said. Now, about 4 years later, he is forced to put his company up for sale.

150 cows removed
"We decided in 2014 to convert the organic beef sector into an organic dairy farm. In 2015 we renovated the stables and in January 2016 we started milking 240 dairy cows of the 'Fleckvieh' (dual purpose cow)" explains an excited Van Twill out. In the course of 2017, the entrepreneur was told that he had been allocated far too few phosphate rights, because no dairy cattle were kept on the farm during the reference date (2 July 2015). "Then we made a request to use the bottleneck arrangement, but unfortunately without success."

Van Twillert had reduced his herd to 2018 cows in the course of 150. "However, a few days after Christmas, we were told that we could only keep 2019 dairy cows in 20." That meant he had to clear out almost all the dairy cows between Christmas and New Years to avert an economic crime. "We did not produce a drop of milk in 2019, because with the phosphate space for 20 cows, we only kept a few young stock."

"This sad event cost us a lot of money. We bought our cows at the time for €2.100 and then had to dispose of almost half of them. We also had to dispose of pregnant heifers and that really touches your heart. The phosphate rights system has been my life's work broke."

Organic dairy farming not guilty
Van Twillert is therefore also furious that organic dairy farming has had to bleed for the phosphate surplus. "The organic farmers do not make use of the derogation and do not have a manure surplus. With our organic approach, we already comply with the circular vision of Minister Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality)", says Van Twillert. 

Organic dairy farmers should never have bled for the phosphate system

- Ko van Twillert

"I even dare to say that my dairy farm is perhaps the worst affected by the phosphate rights system." Buying additional phosphate rights is not an option for Van Twillert. "The bank did not want to finance these phosphate rights and I did not have the money myself." Selling land to buy rights with that money was also not an option for the livestock farmer. "Which farmer is going to sell land and then buy back phosphate rights, when the rights are probably finite? That would be a bad investment, but unfortunately it means that we had to stop our dairy farm."

According to Van Twillert, our rights system cannot be explained to anyone: "I can still fill my stables with beef cattle, but I am no longer allowed to keep dairy cows (because of the phosphate rights). What is the difference in manure production between beef cattle and dairy cattle?" In recent years, he has sent various letters of objection to Minister Schouten, but he received no reply. "The ministry says that the rights system was established together with LTO Nederland and Dutch dairy processors. Unfortunately, these parties do not represent organic dairy farming. I have already spent €50.000 on attorney's fees, but unfortunately without success." 

Costs continue
Van Twillert recently decided to put his dairy farm up for sale. Over the years I have invested over $5,5 million in buildings, but I will probably never get that amount back. "I hope I get half." 

He hopes to sell his company quickly, because the costs are currently continuing. "Our own manure production has come to a standstill. To fertilize our meadows, we should even have to buy organic cattle manure. This is because there is an organic manure shortage. We now fertilize with organic pig manure, but that is not our preference." 

'Ultramodern dairy farm'
Van Twillert has put his company up for sale at the brokerage Havinga from Briltil in Groningen. The brokerage is enthusiastic and speaks of an ultramodern dairy farm. "In 2015 a milking parlor (Dairymaster 2 x 22 Swing-over) was built that is still brand new." In addition, according to the broker, there is a modern free stall barn and investments have been made in extra feed storage. The stable complex offers space for a total of 460 animals. 

Ko-Kalf has over 200 hectares of land, which is also for sale. According to the broker, not all of these plots are located near the home plot. In addition, there are 2 commercial houses. The broker says that the dairy farm can also be sold or leased in parts.

Ready for (organic) dairy farmer
Havinga expects that there is definitely a market for this business, given that construction costs have risen significantly in recent years. In addition, applications for a building permit and NBW permit (Nature Conservation Act) have a long lead time and are difficult to issue. "This company is literally ready to move in and already certified organic, although a conventional dairy farmer can also farm super here."

"The object must of course fit someone, but excellent money has been made in recent years in both dairy farming and arable farming," says the broker. Van Twillert himself hopes that his dairy farm is purchased by an organic dairy farmer, given that all these years investment has been made in the certification for this.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Wouter Job

Wouter Baan is editor-in-chief of Boerenbusiness. He also focuses on dairy, pig and meat markets. He also follows (business) developments within agribusiness and interviews CEOs and policymakers.
Comments
21 comments
has 1 April 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk/ artikel/10881889/phosphaterechten-leiden-tot-triest-einde-van-ko-kalf]Phosphate rights lead to sad end of Ko-Kalf[/url]
too crazy for words .that the rules of the game can change during the game.
Marcel 1 April 2019
Whichever way you look at it, those 240 cows have been added, why do I have to hand in extra cows myself while we have kept 15 fewer cows in the past 40 years and someone else could keep 240 cows for free?? For us this also means that the family income will fall by 40% due to the compulsory contraction...!! The investments have also been made to be able to grow again, and therefore certainly not to downsize...! The roughage of our cows also comes from our environment...!!
Gerard 1 April 2019
It is a pity that people are left out of every arrangement.
But the self-righteous attitude as described here is certainly not collegial.
Do the organic livestock farmers suffer from this, feel better than anyone else?
has 2 April 2019
marcel, did you join the derogation.
I don't, but it costs me a lot of money, and I've never benefited from it.
IJsselmeer clay 2 April 2019
If only he had been called Howik, Lily or Mauro, he would have obtained the necessary phosphate rights.
Would be a hoot if this modern mega organic company were bought by a conventional livestock farmer. A real thorn in the side of the green guard in this country. It is better to buy the nature clubs together to remediate the company and to protect the Netherlands from this methane monstrosity. 5,5 million from the postcode lottery should not be a problem.
p 2 April 2019
I have no sympathy for people who want to arrange everything over someone else's back. The organic sector pollutes just as much or more than usual. This person has bought this as an investment and then let it run with a few employees, these costs are already more than it yields. If you are so committed to a dairy farm, you have to work hard for it yourself. He had the money and the staff had to do the work. A farmer in the Sunday suit is not a farmer but a here farmer
Carla 2 April 2019
The flip side of this story: Ko-kalf only started after July 2, 2015, after which every growth was for its own account. If Ko-kalf had been classified as a bottleneck after all, and with Ko-kalf many more other companies that started after July 2, 2015, other companies would have been cut. That's not real. Ko-calf has jumped into the deep end hoping for a life preserver in the form of free phosphate rights. Unfortunately, that life buoy did not come for Ko-calf, but it did save other dairy farms that have already been cut by 8,3%.
z 2 April 2019
You are absolutely right
shoemakers1 2 April 2019
It always remains a form of bad management to change the rules afterwards, should not be allowed and those responsible should also pay for this, but they are not so just in the Netherlands, here they can only set people against each other, it is it is not normal that people now say that it is your own fault because otherwise the other farmers will have to pay for it, ONLY THE GOVERNMENT IS TOGETHER
p 2 April 2019
Shoemakers 1 don't complain everyone knew that you could not continue to grow for free and undisturbed This farmer also knew that but wanted to benefit soon meat cattle had no rights milk cattle get 250 dairy rights for free everyone wants and there are plenty of people out there more difficult than this man and have to solve it yourself without money
shoemakers1 2 April 2019
I'm not saying that it won't be difficult for others, but I think it's terrible that in this country you can't assume if you follow the rules that you're doing well, no matter how difficult the rules are sometimes, but if it turns out that something that is allowed is not allowed, yes, then you can only say that the government is not doing it right, if you call that nagging, then I call you a sucker
Ruud Hendriks 2 April 2019
It's sad how much trash I read about "taking advantage", "methane monstrosity" etc. while people don't know the company and don't know what socially committed drive is behind the entrepreneur, who started as a pioneer 20 years ago. Why so eager to express an opinion without basing it on factual knowledge of the situation?
The core is that all companies that work soil-bound and thus do not contribute to the phosphate problem, which do anticipate the circular policy, will have to pay for those who have lost the soil-bound nature because they want to get rid of excessive amounts of foreign phosphate on Dutch soil via concentrates. And the bottleneck is a then visionless government and ditto LTO that did not foresee how wrong letting go of the quota could go. The blind faith in growth and market forces, which does not work for agriculture.

Ruud Hendriks, Aeres Warmonderhof
Ton Westgeest 2 April 2019
at the time visionless government and ditto LTO

Ruud, you don't mean to say that they do have vision now, do you?
Politicians are simply puppets of big industry. That is why they benefit from growth and market forces and so much goes wrong.....
and not just in agriculture, look what's happening in healthcare!
Hunting and bagging nice jobs it is becoming increasingly clear...

You also pretend that it is an end in itself to want to get rid of foreign phosphate on Dutch soil, farmers just wanted to grow.
If that is not inhibited and you only feel stimulated by LTO, dairies, banks, government, feed factories and colleagues, yes then you will get this situation!
Added to that is the feeling that you will have missed the boat..... It has become a different time, from 1952 you just couldn't do it wrong, no matter how big you grew, it always worked out!
p 2 April 2019
Ruud you have a colored view of Bio I have seen on the internet but it does not take away the Organic agriculture pollutes just as much as regular agriculture The Bio does not spray weeds but egt or hoe through the crop many times you need more land for the same yield more km to collect and process products, so more co2 emissions and less oxygen production per ha.
The Bio always tries to push regular agriculture into a corner that what they are doing is not good . I would like to say improve the world and start with yourself no longer driving a car no more flying holidays but go cycling
IJsselmeer clay 3 April 2019
@ Ruud Hendriks

You are absolutely right. My response was very sarcasm and I tried to show how polarizing discussions often are these days. But also that it makes a big difference on which stage you act with regard to stretching the rules. Where you see a zero tolerance policy in the agricultural sector that farmers have to comply with, the rules in many other areas are often stretched or many exceptions are made for unclear reasons.

After my response I googled the company and saw how open they are to the citizen with information and accessibility, hats off for investing so much time in this.

I fully understand that cattle farmers have taken the gamble to grow in 2015. especially if you have already been wrong with the quota reference, just as some arable farmers were aware of the import of beet quota and therefore extra beets in the reference year. have sown and have thus been allocated more reference. An unclear government is certainly to blame for this in my view.
pieter 3 April 2019
dear TEM, derogation means less manure on the market. This applies to all sectors Everyone benefits from this. Except for the land-bound farmers who are allowed to supply manure every year, for which they earn less. So lean less on the shoulders of the non-land-bound farmers!!
has 3 April 2019
everyone 190 kg was just as much space. and then there would have been no discrimination against the people who have land. Nor would the poke have been the roguishness of the poke.
Subscriber
Jan 4 April 2019
Livestock is always land-based. After all, you have to dispose of your manure responsibly. And does or does not count land at 20 km.
Land abroad, rent land and all possible constructions
Whether or not manure processing, etc.
We would get bogged down in endless discussions.
But, society just wants less cattle, red/black or organic, it doesn't matter.
When will the penny drop for everyone?

Very sad what happened to the above livestock farmer, but this has been a lack of vision and courage of the infamous three: RABO, NZO and LTO. Not knowing what is going on in society.





shoemakers1 4 April 2019
Jan says, therefore, democracy is a society where discrimination is allowed
Cv 5 April 2019
2100 euros seems a lot to me per milk cow!!, you can get a good dairy cow for 1300 to 1400 euros.
Subscriber
Karel 5 April 2019
This amount has been paid for 'Fleckvieh' (double purpose cow)
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

News Milk

Phosphate trade to have peak year in 2024

News Ground

'Stop soil leads to more arable farming area'

Background Ground

Do you choose the farmer or the investor in the tenancy law?

News Ground

French land prices rise, but trade collapses

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register