Shutterstock

Analysis Half-year figures

Less is more at ForFarmers and FrieslandCampina

17 August 2019 - Wouter Baan - 3 comments

FrieslandCampina and ForFarmers are 2 completely different companies, but they have one thing in common. Less volume leads to more profit. Or vice versa.

Both agricultural superpowers have recently published their half-year figures. This shows that more is not always better. FrieslandCampina, for example, achieved more profit with less milk. The increasing feed sales at ForFarmers, on the other hand, are not leading to better figures. Far from that. 

Less milk, more profit
FrieslandCampina has been struggling for years with a relatively large volume of milk that is loss-making. In 2018, the dairy cooperative collected 10,3 billion kilos of milk, of which approximately 3 to 4 billion kilos were reported to be loss-making. However, the milk supply has fallen sharply this year and profitability is immediately increasing again.

The member dairy farmers produced approximately 5% less milk in the first half of this year, partly due to the outflow of a number of colleagues to A-ware. In this period, the operating result rose by a sloppy 20% to €210 million. At the bottom of the line, approximately €121 million in profit was made, an increase of 11%. FrieslandCampina attributes the increase in profit to a large extent to the smaller surpluses, which did not have to be processed into loss-making bulk butter and milk powder.

More feed, less profit
At ForFarmers, the situation is exactly the opposite. The listed animal feed group from Lochem saw its feed sales rise in the first half of the year, but its profits fell sharply. In the 5 countries in which it is active, total feed sales are up 5% to 5,1 million tons. Operating profit, however, fell by more than 30% to €35,8 million, of which a meager €11,9 million remained at the bottom of the line. It looks like the group will be heading for a historically low profit this year. 

The nuance
The question is to what extent the profit figures are a volume issue, because 'less is more' is of course only an observation at first glance. Although both companies are agricultural strongholds, they are completely different from each other and therefore cannot be compared 1 on 1. 

The lower profit at ForFarmers, for example, is also due to a failing purchasing policy. The higher feed sales are the result of 4 acquisitions that ForFarmers made in the second half of 2018. It takes time (and money) to integrate these companies into the group. FrieslandCampina also owes the higher profit to the sale of its branded dairy products, which is a spearhead in the new strategy launched last year. Cheese, in particular, has performed well in recent months.

A lesson
Nevertheless, the figures at both companies do show that more is not always better. Also over a longer period of time. ForFarmers saw its feed sales increase by approximately 2012% (+2018 million tons) due to a series of acquisitions between 50 and 3,4. However, profitability has barely increased in the meantime.

FrieslandCampina saw profits decline in 2017 and 2018, after milk production had increased considerably (due to the abolition of the milk quota). In 2017, for example, the supply rose to a record 11,4 billion kilos. Profits plummeted in the same year by €135 million to €227 million. Thanks to an incidental income (sale Riedel), the figures were polished up a bit. 

Stripe through new factories
Although the results are not just a volume issue, the figures speak for themselves. Not only on the farm, but also agribusiness seems to be reaching the limits of scaling up. It will therefore be interesting to see what strategy both companies will adopt in the coming years. 

At FrieslandCampina it is now clear that they focus on quality instead of quantity. In other words: the focus will be (more) on branded dairy instead of bulk. The much-discussed PlanetProof milk flow is an example of this. ForFarmers will come up with a new strategy next year. The question is whether they will then continue to focus on unbridled growth in the markets in which they are now active, or whether they will seek their luck more in Eastern Europe or perhaps even beyond.

Coincidentally, both FrieslandCampina and ForFarmers canceled the construction of a new factory. FrieslandCampina in the Netherlands and ForFarmers in Germany. This probably says enough. 

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Wouter Job

Wouter Baan is Head of Meat & Dairy at BoerenbusinessAt DCA Market Intelligence, he focuses on dairy, pork, and meat markets. He also monitors (business) developments within agribusiness and interviews CEOs and policymakers.
Comments
3 comments
Padre 19 August 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk/ artikel/10883674/less-is-more-bij-forfarmers-en-frieslandcampina]Less is more at ForFarmers and FrieslandCampina[/url]
The management and central management are not capable of suffering such a company and they only want more and bigger to get their own remuneration as high as possible they are not there for the members but for themselves a farmer and a wake have never had but a gentleman and a bear like much more this money for the top of these companies just like with Vion there it also went wrong due to the same situation
Ton Westgeest 19 August 2019
Now don't blame these two companies.... It's everywhere all companies that are getting too big or have too big headquarters and have lost the feeling with the basics, that's where you come across this.

When you arrive at FC's head office, you can already see that something is wrong.
It's like being in Brussels at the Euro parliament. Totally lost.... you are met by the reception manager who will take you to the product manager who will argue about the fact that the appointment has not been registered on time. In the afternoon they know who to contact and if you are lucky the person you want to talk to will still come up if he is not having a bad day.

How many factories has FC closed in recent years? 60? and now build a few more? What a waste of capital!!

Only a government can afford that!

A piece of advice: get your feet on the ground once again board, and go back to basics: earn money for your members!!!
Fortissimo 19 August 2019
Dear Ton,

This management will no longer do that. They sell a former cash cow every year. Sold Riedel last year, the following year the summary of the annual report states that they are missing Riedel's turnover. Now you can hear how the acquiring party is repositioning the brand through radio spots. It won't be Hallelujah directly, but it does have to do with entrepreneurship and you don't learn that at Nijenrode. Just to get you out of any predicament. At ForFarmers or was it FromFarmers? Oh no, that was it once......;)! Well there they now have an excuse about wrong contracts in purchasing. That's bullshit. That is why there are dearly paid nutritionists and market specialists in the office of such companies. To bring out the best for the owners of the coop or the investors. Now the bond is gone, they are making a mess and prices are going up. Companies are becoming impersonal and almost impossible to manage.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

Analysis Feed

How puzzle pieces fall into place at ForFarmers

News Feed

ForFarmers well on track for best result ever

News milk

FrieslandCampina hopes for a quick restart of Borculo

News Feed

ForFarmers acquires 80.000 tons of compound feed

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Register