Shutterstock

News undersow

Authorities lenient with catch crop deadline

20 September 2019 - Wouter Baan - 13 comments

Maize growers who saw the under-sowing fail may also sow a catch crop again after 1 October. The Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality has decided this together with the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority and the Netherlands Enterprise Agency.

Many entrepreneurs deliberately opted for under-sowing this year, in order to be able to harvest maize after October 1. Due to the drought, which particularly gripped the east of the Netherlands, undersowing failed in many places or occurred only to a limited extent. However, a best efforts obligation is not enough, the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority also demands results in the form of a covered floor.

Immediate action needed after maize harvest
To give entrepreneurs leeway, the authorities have decided that a catch crop may also be sown after 1 October. The requirement is now that a catch crop is sown immediately after the maize harvest and that evidence of this can be refuted. Reportedly, the half of the maize growers violated the rules if the October 1 deadline had remained in place. 

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Wouter Job

Wouter Baan is editor-in-chief of Boerenbusiness. He also focuses on dairy, pig and meat markets. He also follows (business) developments within agribusiness and interviews CEOs and policymakers.
Comments
13 comments
Vandera 20 September 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk/article/10884072/authorities-coulant-met-deadline-vanggewas]Authorities lenient with catch-gewas deadline[/url]
And again the rules are changed during the game. I assume that the exemption only applies to those where the underseeding has failed.
Subscriber
Fortissimo 20 September 2019
That's not nice. Given the extreme weather conditions, those who have already sown and can demonstrate this should simply be exempted.
Jan 20 September 2019
Yes, it is of no use to us, rather clarity. Is it possible to harvest after 1 October and sow a catch crop?
Subscriber
Dirk 20 September 2019
I read somewhere that it is no longer about the obligation to sow, but about the obligation to produce. So sow again.
There is consolation: those parts where the catch crop was successful with undersowing, you do not have to sow again (!)

But if you just choose a variety from the very early group here in Brabant, you can chop everything with 35% DM next week.
Then you can just sow a catch crop before October 01st and you have nothing to do with the misery of undersowing.
And there are diff. varieties from the very early group that are not inferior to the mid-early/late group in terms of ds/vem yield.

I must add that it may well be that our experience does not apply to the northern provinces
Gert 20 September 2019
What a nice government we have again, just let rules sow practically right after chopping
January 20 September 2019
That's going to be a matter for discussion! One "glasses" is not the other!!
lottery ticket 20 September 2019
ii you are under the law you have to make an effort obligation so undersow failed next year new round new opportunities
shoemakers 1 20 September 2019
Dear Dirk, with which grain maize can I thresh next week, please a variety with sufficient yield?
shoemakers 1 20 September 2019
And also for silage, the varieties from the very early group cannot be compared at all in yield with the very late varieties, there may be a yield difference of up to 40%, it is just that they want to get rid of the maize, the revenue model in the maize must go to the buttons
josef 20 September 2019
Typical again the politicians : just like pigeons, when they sit on the ground they eat from your hand, but when they fly in the air they shit you on your head !!!
So unreliable!
Agree with Gert, immediately after chopping catch crop.
eiden 20 September 2019
Special, the entire winter crop due to leaching of minerals has a negative footprint if you include everything. But if it is mentioned often enough, even farmers start to believe in it. Stop the obligation in the context of reduced regulations and let everyone use their own skills whether it is necessary or not.
shoemakers 1 20 September 2019
the truth is not important, but the delusions
Subscriber
Dirk 20 September 2019
Don't ask me about grain corn.
Cutting maize, we as a family have 48 years of experience with that.
A 40% yield difference will surely be due to different cultivation conditions (soil type, etc., etc.).
Not in variety selection.
We are concerned with quality, less with mass.
From a cultivation point of view and from a regulatory point of view, a few varieties from the very early group are excellent for us.

We do indeed agree that maize is treated in a special way by our government.
For example, animal manure may be spread on arable land up to and including 15 September with an obligation to sow green manure, except for maize land.
Why?, we are almost on a balance fertilization.
Apparently people still have the image in mind of "manure dumping" on maize land which is simply no longer possible or not.
Arable land where cut or grain maize has been grown is not referred to as green manure, but as catch crop.
It does indeed give you a strange feeling.
Delusions among some, yes there is something to be said for that.
Perhaps you can speak of demonizing maize (land).
Not then?
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register