Interview Jan Cees Vogelaar

'Nitrogen plan is the same monstrosity as phosphate law'

18 October 2019 - Wouter Baan - 45 comments

Jan Cees Vogelaar, the chairman of the Mesdag Dairy Fund Foundation, is closely involved in the nitrogen dossier. After the hearing on Wednesday, October 16, in which he spoke himself, and the debate on Thursday evening, October 17, the chairman is not confident that the cabinet will come up with solutions. 

How do you look back on the hearing and the nitrogen debate?
"The hearing was positive in a sense, because it acknowledged that external netting is probably not legally feasible. I look back less positively on the debate. Minister Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality) does not have a good plan. In this way, all farmers are stopped in their business development, while the latent space is reduced. It is logical that this results in farmer protests."

The minister goes in consultation with the provinces and has until 1 December to do so. What does this mean?
"Minister Schouten has bought time, but the problem has not been solved. If she sticks to her way of thinking, the nitrogen reduction plan will become a copy of the phosphate reduction plan. The legislation is a monstrosity and I fear that nitrogen will become that too. however, the nitrogen legislation is much larger than the phosphate legislation, because this also applies to sectors outside the livestock sector, such as construction. Ultimately, society as a whole will be affected by this, because the plans are likely to hit the economy hard. It is therefore quite possible that the farmers' protests are getting acclaim from more sectors."

What are solutions that do work?
"A solution could be to amend the Nature Conservation Act, because not all Natura 2000 areas can be labeled as nature. Heath, for example, is cultivated land and not so much nature. That is an essential difference. One could also think of the application of nitrogen reducing barn techniques. This is much cheaper than buying farms. The first costs between €2 and €8 per reduced kilo of nitrogen. The second is much more expensive and costs €800 to €1400 per kilo of nitrogen."

What is the Mesdag Dairy Fund doing in the meantime?
"We continue to do research to uncover the truth. We want to find out the emissions and deposition in order to be able to draw up policy on that. Not an arithmetic model that is as leaky as a basket. I happen to have another meeting on Friday afternoon October 18th with the University of Amsterdam that will do this research for us. We have been offered the help of 3 provinces and a few municipalities are also participating. We are happy with that. However, this research will take 3 years, so unfortunately we cannot provide any results in the short term refute."

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Wouter Job

Wouter Baan is editor-in-chief of Boerenbusiness. He also focuses on dairy, pig and meat markets. He also follows (business) developments within agribusiness and interviews CEOs and policymakers.
Comments
45 comments
milker for nothing 18 October 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk/ artikel/10884390/stikstofplan-is-nieuwe-gedrocht-als-phosphatewet]'Stikstofplan is the same monstrosity as the phosphate law'[/url]
Good work Jan Cees keep it up, although I'm just like you afraid it will end badly.
polder pager 18 October 2019
Agriculture would account for 46 percent of nitrogen emissions. the same card states that 32 percent comes from abroad. can someone explain to me how the Netherlands (read: agriculture) can be settled on something that is produced abroad????
dirk 18 October 2019
The first person who is willing to pay 800-1400 euros per kg N can have the entire shop. I am ready!
Thomas 18 October 2019
@dirk
That's what you've worked for, and that may well be a considerable amount.
ifhetaanmeilag 18 October 2019
Burning biomass and planting trees to replace it that may compensate for CO2 in the future is of the same monstrosity. Reverse temporization based on shaky assumptions also costs billions
é€ 18 October 2019
If an investigation into the actual emissions and deposition is going to take 3 years, we must also focus on something else. In three years' time, if it is up to the Green Left and the Coalition, half of the peasantry will have been removed. If you hear D66 and Groen Links talking to cattle trucks on the railways of the Dutch Railways, you might be able to see them again, because we have to go!!

Wednesday's hearing indicates that the AERIUS calculation model, which RIVM uses, contains so many impurities and blind spots, from 30 to 100%, that not one judge can work with it for evidence anymore....

The hearing also indicates that our representatives have very little knowledge about the matter, even Doctor de Groot. It makes clear that there are great powers at work behind the greens and it would be nice for honesty if we know whether those powers are behind it with money....
Because it remains very strange that Tjeerd first was in favor of an expansion of 20% of the livestock and now wants to halve the livestock!!

The hearing also indicates that other countries do things differently than we do or not at all.... They work with different figures and have a completely different idea of ​​​​natural parks. For example, what is called a nature park here, they simply excavate in Germany and turn it into agricultural land. eg Manderheide and Engbertsdijksvenen.

I want to make it clear that we have to tap from a different keg.....
Working with different figures, with different distances, with different rules or even with the millions they now want to buy the farmers away with, turning back the natural parks in Brussels.

Because one thing is not right either, that everyone talks about nature parks. If man has built it, it is only a PARK!!!!
Ton Westgeest 18 October 2019
If an investigation into the actual emissions and deposition is going to take 3 years, we must also focus on something else. In three years' time, if it is up to the Green Left and the Coalition, half of the peasantry will have been removed. If you hear D66 and Groen Links talking to cattle trucks on the railways of the Dutch Railways, you might be able to see them again, because we have to go!!

Wednesday's hearing indicates that the AERIUS calculation model, which RIVM uses, contains so many impurities and blind spots, from 30 to 100%, that not one judge can work with it for evidence anymore....

The hearing also indicates that our representatives have very little knowledge about the matter, even Doctor de Groot. It makes clear that there are great powers at work behind the greens and it would be nice for honesty if we know whether those powers are behind it with money....
Because it remains very strange that Tjeerd first was in favor of an expansion of 20% of the livestock and now wants to halve the livestock!!

The hearing also indicates that other countries do things differently than we do or not at all.... They work with different figures and have a completely different idea of ​​​​natural parks. For example, what is called a nature park here, they simply excavate in Germany and turn it into agricultural land. eg Manderheide and Engbertsdijksvenen.

I want to make it clear that we have to tap from a different keg.....
Working with different figures, with different distances, with different rules or even with the millions they now want to buy the farmers away with, turning back the natural parks in Brussels.

Because one thing is not right either, that everyone talks about nature parks. If man has built it, it is only a PARK!!!!
Joop 18 October 2019
It is of course not the fault of the farmers, but people are already being fired in the construction industry because of canceling orders. Do you have a solution for that because this will cause very big problems if this takes a few more months. I don't think construction can take another blow. We are just getting back on track when the young people are fired again, we will probably never find new construction workers again. The economic damage is enormous with that lax stuff... waiting every day with permits is 1 too many!!!!!
Aj oot Twenye 18 October 2019
We need to consult with construction. There are plenty of farmers who want to sell the latent permit. Provided that the license is not reduced, not even latently. Something has to be devised that there will be enough affordable NH3 for the farmers. Then you have win win
Ton Westgeest 18 October 2019
Yes, but Joop, do you want to put all that on our plate?? That if in the 60s, during the troubles of the Landbouwschap, there will be suicides again??

The King said it so beautifully, "It is a problem of the Netherlands, not just of the farmers". You have kept Rutte in the saddle for years, you have to look for it there and the governments for it... What do you think of Veerman?? Yes from Natuurmonumenten!

For years they have made a mess of it, all driven by self-interest!! You must be in politics!! And if you have supported these politicians again and again...... You have nothing to say at all!!!

It will be, I agree, everything is in a mess, farmers are demonstrating, construction will soon be demonstrating, 200000 people from healthcare, education, police, lawyers and the students I just hope that we will all do it at the same time !!!

If you are going to vote for the government parties, you indicate:
KEEP IT UP! It's going well!! That's what elections are for....
Maxwell 18 October 2019
It is necessary that Dutch farmers and their advocates rediscover their moral compass and embrace stewardship (again).
Just like other sectors and companies, agriculture must be adhered to the principles of 'people, planet profit'
And just like other sectors, agriculture must change to have a future in the Netherlands, Europe, and the world
Maxwell 18 October 2019
It is necessary that Dutch farmers and their advocates rediscover their moral compass and embrace stewardship (again).
Just like other sectors and companies, agriculture must be adhered to the principles of 'people, planet profit'
And just like other sectors, agriculture has to change in order to have a future in the Netherlands, Europe, and the world
Subscriber
drama 18 October 2019
Continue protesting along with the construction workers! Because what is it about? For a few plants in a nature reserve that do not grow because of the nitrogen, for the rest nothing or no one is bothered by this. They don't seem to be in a good mood, shutting everything down for a few plants.
dirk 18 October 2019
I don't hear anywhere that the construction world is already chasing nitrogen rights, if they would speak a little louder to the government, we could do business quickly. And haste is called for, said Remkes! Why does everything have to take so long? Now we get to hear another small picket post by December 1 at the latest, says the minister and so the time flies by. While the farmers are at a loss as to how to proceed, a permit application must be submitted in Brabant before 1-4-2020 on how you will meet the 85 % NH3 reduction in your stables, while for many there is no good system at all. the market is. So here in Brabant we probably won't have time to consider whether the warm remediation is something to comment on. Or is it precisely the intention of the left to let everyone bleed to death?
durk 18 October 2019
The leftist cabal is controlled by the big money behind these puppets with the aim of decimating the livestock.

For years our advocacy groups thought they had the biggest lobby towards politics, but in reality they were the financiers of this leftist clique. Always follow the money, follow the money.
Jan Zonderland 18 October 2019
There must be a double agenda behind this whole nitrogen thing. Otherwise it is inexplicable that the government is so clinging to plans to reduce N emissions by tackling the only profession where, in their opinion, this can be done quite easily. Because how do you want to reduce emissions from construction, industry, car and air traffic? That is very difficult. In essence, however, a reduction is not necessary at all: set the standards in the Netherlands on the same level as those of the surrounding countries and there is no longer a problem at all. But apparently they don't want that and I think it's because of that double agenda. But what it is, that's a guess for me too. Who knows may say.
Subscriber
bolinder 18 October 2019
how difficult can it be, find a few independent research bureaus, have them measure nitrogen in 10 different nature reserves throughout the Netherlands.
And voila within two weeks you know exactly where you stand.
and that's how Jan Cees should do it.
in three years it will be too late. Waste of time, money and effort
take action now!!!!
polder pager 18 October 2019
I think Jan Zonderland is right. How else can you count nitrogen produced abroad? Not even a little bit: 32%!! If you delete that: problem solved, construction companies back on track.
piet 18 October 2019
We must not let this happen. I am so committed at the moment that we will simply throw all the rules aside from January 1, 2020. no more keeping a phosphate planner no more filling in the cycle no filling in May 15 no more applying for a derogation no longer wanting to receive the payment entitlements. nothing left. Because all that policy of recent years is not good enough. Be ready for a bit.
a-may 19 October 2019
..there must be a double agenda behind it, the farmers out means more land to build, we let animals from the original packaging grow green there again, add an airport... that's fine as long as we stay below the standards of the nitrogen policy. , just from abroad ... good for the economy.
The Dutchman hangs like a doll on strings, controlled by this government without their own input..... they call it structured
Subscriber
mt 19 October 2019

For the time being, the gigantic bunglers from The Hague are already on recess!

Leaving the country divided and misgoverned.

Enjoy the sun ladies and gentlemen. 3 times underhanded BAH
Joep 19 October 2019
Like idiots and non-valeurs dogmas about phosphate
can sell to the politicians and if they apparently like that as sweet porridge
have swallowed it, it is high time to use our common sense again.
The first question : How did the Hondsrug originate ?
Second question. : How do coal and natural gas get into our soil?
Answer : Not by the farmers because they know that we know little or nothing about our solar system.
But... because of that there is room for idiots, demagogues and non valeurs
to throw unbridled nonsense and fallacious hypotheses into the world.
The press and politicians largely owe their existence to this.
That is worrying, but above all a shame.
CHAPEAU to our farmers for fighting back right now with their backs against the wall.
peasant 19 October 2019
T Boudet asked for a German model and you will have that within 1 week, because it has been running for years. If the government doesn't cooperate, go to the European court.
Latency space that is given to farmers remains the state and province of because that is THEFT. When theft is you go across borders, the farmers will also cross borders. I don't think we can stop because the whole world is watching us. The Poles have already spoken in Bilthoven and Canada and America are watching and supporting with us. If we lose, the whole agricultural world will lose, they think. Theft of latent space probably means terrible things to nature and nobody wants that and that is worse than a door in Groningen. the provincial executive must now know very well if they go further than the minister and that the farmers can no longer be mocked, that is painful.
Again WHO STEALS IS A THIEF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Doubting Pig Farmer 19 October 2019
If from 2016 we had already had the opportunity to sell pig rights as phosphate rights with eg and a discount of 50%, then you would already have had much fewer pigs and a few more cows, but then a reduction of manure and therefore ammonia of 50 %
But the NVV from then had to be so necessary against it because of other or I think its own interests.
Then you would have had fewer problems and a decent reorganization of the pig farm.
Livestock farming might also have paid a little less due to the increased supply.
In addition, the government could have used their budget for scrapping schemes or retraining, etc.
So a bit of own fault of the (pig) farmers drivers.
kees 19 October 2019
Nice reasoning Jan Kees, you yourself have always been against measuring in manure! only if farmers do that they will get out but Jan Kees does not want that so he is just as reprehensible as whoever he attacks.
measures in manure and not only total nitrogen but ammonium and organically bound. ammonium can become ammonia, by feeding differently you can lower that ammonium, costs not much to nothing at all! BUT don't want to think that way. 5 years ago Jan Kees told you to feed as much ammonium as possible in the manure because that is a fertilizer substitute.
I keep enjoying!
Charlie 19 October 2019
And the most absurd thing is that most nature reserves were originally agricultural land. This country is a dictatorship of the minorities.
Hans 19 October 2019
They have made a great file of it there in The Hague, so much so that they have started to believe in it themselves.
Graduates, that may sound interesting, but that is now becoming a major problem in our society.
They miss all contact with the workplace, but are beginning to show an extremely parasitic behavior there.
If you think about that, you will see that this is taking on huge proportions in many sectors right now!!
Also in this nitrogen file, Carola is then she herself says Minister of Agriculture, but she just lets them suffocate!
Look, if construction only produces nitrogen during the construction process, then a temporary rent of latent space seems sufficient to me to settle the matter! We're not going to lock up crooks and steal the hardest ourselves, are we? BV Netherlands!
So there must be a hidden agenda behind it!
Nature is everything that grows and blooms, and so is all of agriculture!
The botanical composition will always change over the centuries.
In the Netherlands we will have to expand the standard to a workable level as soon as possible and not want to save the most sensitive plant, there will be another one.
I also went to The Hague with the farmers' campaigns.
At such times I take the opportunity to walk into town to speak to people there.
One clear conclusion can be drawn: not only the farmers are sick and tired of this government policy!!!
January 19 October 2019
Compared to other countries we have almost 70% too many nature reserves in the Netherlands and we have 5.000.000 people too many in our country it is not wise to do something about this, there are parties that can do this, let's rule them with us then many problems solved.
shoemakers 1 19 October 2019
civil servants have an interest in the continuation of problems, otherwise they will lose their hobby, which is why it is such a big mess in the administrative Netherlands, as long as they do not become personally liable for their mistakes, they can continue to mess around without thinking
Ton Westgeest 19 October 2019
Finally someone who gets it....I don't have to add anything more!

You just don't have to vote them anymore! And when I see the latest polls, there are still so many who don't get it!

And then we just go on like this....
Law 19 October 2019
I think the double agenda they have is called "SPACE". It is rare in our country. Badly beaten, some of the farmers will give up thanks to the political posturing... .Cat in a bowl!
summer 19 October 2019
There will be a party that will stand up for us, I am convinced of that. But that too in a few years' time at the next elections. If it falls of course earlier.
hans 19 October 2019
Yes Summer, and there are already parties that (want to) stand up for you.

Do you know how many parties participate in elections?
Do you know how much it costs to participate in elections?
With a (national) campaign?
And how do you get airtime?
And how "the polls" are manipulated?

Everything is closed, big money is defending its interests, independent media may still be digital on the net, although Google, YouTube and Facebook are also under the influence of "political correctness" (fake news).

A democracy that does not guarantee an independent, free press, and where money dictates election campaigns, is not a democracy.
Drikus 19 October 2019
People who have latent space do not emit nitrogen over this space. But usually they have already built the barn and would slowly start keeping more animals. If this space is occupied by any government whatsoever . Then they must also reimburse the costs incurred for this space for stables etc. . And supplement any part of the farmer 's income if this means that the company will no longer remain viable in the long term . I am not dependent on my (small farmer's income) but if I decrease part of my work income, I would also like to have that supplemented and if I had incurred extra costs for my work, I would also like to have these reimbursed pro rata . That is nothing more than normal and that applies to everyone , including farmers .
Wilma 19 October 2019
Thank you Jan Cees for your efforts
polder pager 20 October 2019
I still don't have an answer to my question what we are going to do with the 32% nitrogen from abroad. we only talk about agriculture here, but I think that's the key: get rid of that 32%!! we have nothing to do with it and we can't do anything about it. let the EU solve that 32% cannot come here.
Ton Westgeest 21 October 2019
Does that include fertilizer, polder pipit, among the 32% from abroad? Because then we have to deal with it...
Not only that the numbers are wrong, but it's all not really clear yet...
They probably don't care either, as long as they can point to someone!
Jacob Bearda 21 October 2019
My appreciation for the work of Jan Cees Vogelaar ea
The cart they pull should have been moved by others.
(read LTO, which I was always a member of)
Hans 21 October 2019
We only talk about the 32% import, we will also export 40%?
Or was this "accidentally" not researched??
Student 21 October 2019
@Polderpieper. The Netherlands is a net exporter of nitrogen, which means that an even larger part is emitted across the border by us. I'm still trying to figure out how that was included in the model.

@maxwell: great stories about people planet profit, but that way of thinking was invented in Wageningen and you are thrown to death with it. Tell us what it could mean in concrete terms for the agricultural sector? The sector wants to work according to those principles, but there must be a policy that is reliable, otherwise you cannot take action and make decisions about investments of hundreds or millions of euros. You do not earn that back in a short term, but the policy does change every time in the short term.
Frank van Pelt 21 October 2019
Damn Jan-Cees, are those suppressed union feelings still coming up???
Lennart 22 October 2019
Polderpieper is right, 32% n from abroad can be deducted!
PA Dog brand 22 October 2019
Why does this have to take so long, these people have years of experience with this. Here is a quote for an explanation of nitrogen from Luchtmeetnet.nl. The farmers really do not appear in this as the causative agents, just read, Here is a quote from the air monitoring network: Nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
The highest concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) occur during the morning and evening rush hours. This substance is released by (road) traffic, energy production and industry. In addition, NO2 is created from a reaction between nitrogen monoxide and ozone. Weather and traffic have a major influence on concentration. The legal standard is an annual average of 40 (μg/m3).
At various locations in the Netherlands, the NO2 concentration is measured with so-called palmes tubes, the annual average results can be viewed on a map.
Ton Westgeest 23 October 2019
What am I hearing now?

PFAS is the abbreviation for a group of more than 6000 chemicals. Substances where you can get all kinds of diseases, including cancer.

One kilogram of dry soil should contain no more than 0,1 micrograms of PFAS. The RIVM has attached an admissible figure to this, just like the nitrogen.

Tonight I heard that there is talk of this figure being stretched......

Why are they rigid with the figures on ammonia nitrogen? Which is non-toxic, carcinogenic, sickening and polluting.??

While NOx nitrogen from cars, aircraft and industry is polluted, sickening and carcinogenic and it is not even talked about??

That with PFAS the numbers can simply be stretched?
while that is polluted, sickening and carcinogenic?

The dredge that we get from Belgium to make the puddles shallow can simply be dumped here???
while that is polluted, sickening and carcinogenic?

The biggest poison and pollution in Rotterdam, is mixed by the fuel oil and sold cheaply to all ships as fuel oil????
while that is polluted, sickening and carcinogenic?

What in God's name are we doing in this beautiful country, what is that stupid politics doing,??
They do the wrong things with everything........what is left for our children????
Ton Westgeest 23 October 2019
Oh I get it already Rutte has no children.....

He'll be ready for a while, and he'll get wet pants when he hears UNILEVER!
livestock farmer 23 October 2019
after the broadcast of Zembla, we can probably also expect production rights for veal calves
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

News Nitrogen

KDW from law and emission targets instead of nitrogen targets

Opinions Wim Groot Koerkamp

Top-down meets bottom-up in nitrogen impasse

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register