Hans Engbers / Shutterstock.com

News Lawsuit

Group of dairy farmers is suing Rabobank

12 December 2019 - Wouter Baan - 8 comments

11 dairy farmers are going to court. They accuse Rabobank of failing to fulfill its duty of care when granting credit related to the abolition of the milk quota in 2015. Rabobank bounces the ball back and points to professional entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial risk.

In the run-up to the disappearance of the milk quota, many dairy farms in the Netherlands have expanded. It was not yet clear at the time that the government was going to introduce the phosphate rights shortly afterwards. At the time of the reference date for the granting of phosphate rights (2 July 2015), many growers had too little stocking density in relation to the barn capacity. Often because construction was still in progress or had just been completed. As a result, they were given too little phosphate space, popularly referred to as 'trapped cases', to utilize the barn capacity.  

Substantial expense
One of the dairy farmers is Hanno Zeinstra from Lelystad. Together with his son, he built a new barn for 2014 cows in 290. He approached Rabobank for financing. During the reference date, the barn was far from full, so they say they are now with the baked pears. "We now milk about 220 cows. We had to buy additional phosphate rights for 45 cows and we are leasing them for about 35 cows. All in all, a significant cost item that cuts down considerably," sighs Zeinstra.

Zeinstra, like many other 'troubleshoots', has submitted the case to the Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal (CBb). But he ruled that the dairy farmer could have foreseen the introduction of phosphate rights. Zeinstra disputes that: "Rabobank never said a word about this. And when the then State Secretary Sharon Dijksma started talking about animal rights, the construction of the new barn was already well advanced and there was no turning back for us."

Requirements for financial compensation
On the advice of advisors, the group of dairy farmers has therefore started a lawsuit against Rabobank. They believe that the bank had a duty of care to point out to unsuspecting dairy farmers that the government might come up with production-limiting measures. The dairy farmers are assisted by law firm Delissen Martens, which specializes in duty of care procedures.

The dairy farmers demand financial compensation from the bank. "Hopefully the judge will rule that Rabobank has failed to fulfill its duty of care." According to Zeinstra, his company is not about to collapse, but he is nevertheless entitled to compensation.  

Rabobank: 'Limit to growth was foreseeable'
Rabobank is surprised by the liability claim and looks forward to the proceedings with confidence. The bank says that dairy farmers have been informed of possible production-limiting measures from various sides before the end of the quota era.

Rabobank says dairy farmers could expect that the government would block unbridled growth in order to maintain the derogation. The money enhancer also believes that a dairy farmer is a professional entrepreneur and may therefore not refer to the bank's duty of care towards private individuals.  

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Wouter Job

Wouter Baan is editor-in-chief of Boerenbusiness. He also focuses on dairy, pig and meat markets. He also follows (business) developments within agribusiness and interviews CEOs and policymakers.
Comments
8 comments
Peter Jansen 12 December 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk/ artikel/10885011/groep-melkveehouders- complaint-rabobank-aan]Group of dairy farmers is suing Rabobank[/url]
Nice and easy from the Rabobank! So what on earth is a bank's motivation to finance if you know it's coming? The judge said it was "foreseeable". So certainly also for a bank like Rabobank with its "smart heads" on board. If you know in advance that problems are going to arise, why are you financing an individual?
sjakie 12 December 2019
these are the real ones first hang out the big young ones now play the victim wretch
we had to hand in 8,2% what it cost us
these farmers do have the permit on order
if later that latent space is worth money, they will also sue the bank to share in the profit
no, because then they are real entrepreneurs
everyone knew that something would come who denies that is behind baks
evers 12 December 2019
if I build a new potato storage facility for 4000 tons and the potatoes go for 2 cents the following year I can also hold the bang liable with the message you knew that the market was running at zero so want compensation we are used to peaks and troughs, really entrepreneurship so...
Joost 13 December 2019
Boy, once upon a time there was a cow farmer with a bit of adversity.
I'm really getting a little sick of this. Sitting on millions of dollars that a normal company can never, ever dream of, double their already large company and in the event of a little setback, they immediately sue the lender.
They have never read a newspaper themselves, probably between 2000 and 2014, never attended a meeting, never watched the 8 o'clock news, never delved into any problem.
Too pathetic and sad for words. 1,5 million loss for these people is comparable to 1 day of rain in the summer.
If the RABO spends money for this, it will be their very last convulsion to keep something of what they once were.
nn 14 December 2019
At the Rabo they ran after the livestock farmers, because they really made tons of money in the quota era. Everything was possible. Now it's different.

Remember a bank is an agency that gives you an umbrella when it's dry and wants it back when it rains.
Piet 15 December 2019
Make lots of money, cry and start over. You wanted to be big and tough, so take the risk.
Gert 23 December 2019
this is entrepreneurial risk be creative yourself and make sure you send something yourself to get out of this epasse do not complain to rabo you have made the decision yourself rabo is simply not your financier anymore. good luck
water willow 23 December 2019
You think a farmer should have known what risks he was running.
I think that Rabobank, with all their expertise, should have known what risks their customers were running
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

News Pigs

'Livestock population to shrink by 18 percent over the next five years'

News Annual figures 2024

Well-farming Rabobank grows strongly in agriculture

News Potatoes

Aviko and Rabobank to provide financial support to growers

News Financial

Rabobank sees agricultural loan applications growing

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register