Aerovista Aerial Photography / Shutterstock.com

News Nitrogen plan

Nitrogen approach cabinet: major intervention in livestock

June 10, 2022 - Linda van Eekeres - 16 comments

In many parts of the Netherlands, nitrogen emissions must be reduced by 70%. This concerns 131 areas close to vulnerable nature, NOS reports. This means that not all farmers can continue with their business, according to the nitrogen plans that the cabinet today brought out. LTO Nederland calls the plans an 'unrealistic clear cut.'

Agractie has already announced earlier today (June 10) a national day of action against the nitrogen plans announced on Wednesday 22 June. The National Program for Rural Areas states per area how much nitrogen emissions must be reduced by 2030 to give nature a chance to recover. In some it is 12%, but there are also 131 where it is very significant. They are spread all over the country, within a kilometer of a protected Natura 2000 area. The government has made €24,3 billion available for the approach, on top of existing resources (€7 billion).

After the Council of Ministers, Minister Christianne van der Wal of Nature and Nitrogen will present the National Program for Rural Areas, including the guiding goals for each area. This with the aim of achieving a nitrogen reduction of 2030% by 50. In conjunction, agriculture minister Henk Staghouwer (ChristenUnie) outlines the perspective of permanent farmers (more on that later).

The provinces must make clear before 1 July 2023 how they intend to achieve the goals. The area-oriented approach must show whether enough farmers in the areas where the cabinet wants it are prepared to stop. "The moment that gradually, regardless of what the goals are, the goals are not in sight, the provinces know that I will intervene," said Minister Van der Wal on Tuesday during question time in the House. She also said: We do not order the provinces to reduce an x ​​percentage of the livestock. We provide guidelines for each area, depending on the quality of the area, for nitrogen, for the Water Framework Directive and for climate. These targets, which must inevitably be established by July 1, 2023, will result in a reduction in livestock numbers. But it's not an end in itself."

Especially dictations from above
LTO Nederland responded quickly to the cabinet plans. "The cabinet's proposals represent an unrealistic clear-cut. Of the countryside, of farmers and horticulturists, but also of nature. Despite a few empathetic words, we mainly see dictates from above, against the agreements in the coalition agreement. That will not work, " says Sjaak van der Tak, chairman of LTO Netherlands in the statement "The cabinet relies on calculations and gets stuck in a legal morass of unworkable standards. The responsibility is shifted to the provinces. The impasse that arises helps nature moreover, not. That is such a shame, especially because broadly supported, realistic proposals have been made by farmers, nature and business organizations.With room for nuance, innovation and a democratic process from the bottom up. If this continues to be felt by the government's route farmers and horticulturists little hope."

The Ministry of Nature and Nitrogen has illustrated the targets per area in the following map.

Source: Ministry of Nature and Nitrogen

(MORE LATER)

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Linda van Eekeres

Linda van Eekeres is co-writing editor-in-chief. She mainly focuses on macro-economic developments and the influence of politics on the agricultural sector.
Comments
16 comments
It can freeze or thaw June 10, 2022
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk/ artikel/10898949/stikstofaanpak-kabinet-forse-invangen-in-veestapel]Stikstofapproach to the cabinet: major intervention in livestock[/url]
The question that remains is who will turn off the light.

I can't help but see that politicians want the agricultural sector out of the Netherlands.
Subscriber
joop June 10, 2022
ah, if the buyout price is right... then why keep muddling on...
Subscriber
epv June 10, 2022
Joop, take a look at how they buy someone out. It's just going to be a drama similar to the earthquake damage and the child benefit affair. Physical warfare at its best. Politics is going to die literally and figuratively. And nature doesn't help.
Netherlands 1980-2022
cars + 75%?
dogs and cats + 50%?
flight movements +100%?
geese +200%?
people + 20%?
All nitrogen production without a permit
nitrogen production agricultural sector -65%!!!
all with nitrogen production license.
It's a shame that the only one with a license is the bobbin.
Finally, I wonder: according to politicians and the courts, innovation offers too little certainty for reduction. Some reduction targets are so high that with total reduction of all activities the targets are not yet achieved. I would like to know whether a judge will proceed with expropriation if the goal is not achieved? Expropriation then does not solve the problem and does not offer any guarantee for achieving the (unrealistic) goal
Subscriber
truth June 10, 2022
epv people only make 40% of it..
Subscriber
Gwoon June 10, 2022
@EPV that's how it is.. industry and airport are colored white on the map.. nitrogen emissions from other sources (such as traffic, industry, shipping, aviation) are being tackled with national measures. With these generic measures, the emission of at least 12 kilotons of nitrogen must be eliminated. How that will happen has yet to be fleshed out.... in other words measuring with 2 standards in BV, i.e. achieving the climate target in 2030
Subscriber
Roy June 10, 2022
very sensible with a food crisis on the way. also very social for the areas that will no longer receive food from the Netherlands, these people will starve...
common sense June 11, 2022
With the peasant protest, Consumers need to know two things (as long as our democracy still exists):

1. We have been voting for visionless, personal politics since October 14, 2010 and take our responsibility through protest.
2. As soon as the protest starts mentioning political names, the discussion ends. (consequence of politics that has functioned for a long time, playing hide and seek of the emperor without clothes), Politicians who drown in this hell of lies are dismissed as fake news, unheard of news, function elsewhere and need protection against successful chess with hatred (P. Fortuyn ).

Without this Public knowledge nothing happens.
It can freeze or thaw June 11, 2022
De Telegraaf contains a well-substantiated commentary on the plans.

This commentator argues that if these plans go ahead, the question is whether the Netherlands can still remain the frontrunner regarding innovations, after all, the number of agricultural companies and companies that depend on agriculture will decrease drastically, which means less money and capacity for research.
He also states that it is questionable whether agricultural education, including Wageningen, can continue to exist in this way. The number of students, which is already decreasing, will decrease even more quickly as a result of these plans.

I can only conclude that we as a sector are going to slide to the level of a third world country with all the consequences that entails.

Ad June 14, 2022
Well, nitrogen accompanied is up in the atmosphere. Because they have shares themselves, they don't do anything about it. We hit the farmers.
Not down on the farmer's land generation after generation they do what they have to do all permits and requirements and they pump a lot of money in. then come back to the hague with a rule of nitrogen supervised that they come up with. this is to get the farmers away buy and destroy them because they are converting the fields into building land. because of housing shortage. meat, grain, maize and milk is not important for the Dutch people.
This is my opinion
I can't give a damn what others think.

Subscriber
Caterpillar June 14, 2022
At the same time as reducing the livestock population, talk about a guaranteed income for the farmer.
If a farmer can earn more with 60 cows which farmer will go to aim for 250 cows?
The government must stop chasing economies of scale with their subsidies (our tax money) but rather support smaller farmers who are also nature-inclusive farmers.
So competition law is not for farmers, they must jointly determine the price for their product and not the factory or supermarket.
Substantial import duties on products that we produce here ourselves, rather ban them, what enormous pollution and nitrogen emissions from all that dragging back and forth. I miss a meaningful discussion and research about these costs and pollution in politics and journalism. In addition, our 1st class food is sold and imported of much lower quality. In any case, the farmer and citizen will not benefit from this.
Are figures known about how much food is needed for each day to be able to estimate how much production the Netherlands itself must supply to provide all inhabitants with basic food? I think it would be useful to know before squeezing in.
common sense June 15, 2022
Nitrogen emissions are shifting to less Efficient farmers. Every consumer must be allocated nitrogen consumption, there is no other solution. Democratic manipulation of lobbyists does not work.

citizens chose this cabinet with solutions that a toddler would be ashamed of
common sense June 17, 2022
Stop submission of farmers and citizens
Subscriber
in hiding June 17, 2022
The opportunity to turn the tide is here. But then everyone has to participate on June 22.
only then there are chances!!!!
The sector is still being played around. That must clearly be different.
So participate in one way or another, even if it is in your own way or way
Heard News June 19, 2022
https://nos.nl/artikel/2185922-nederlandse-boeren-hebben-laagste-milieu-impact-ter-wereld

https://www.nu.nl/klimaat/6206878/het-gaat-slecht-met-de-nederlandse-natuur-maar-er-gloort-ook-hoop.html
Subscriber
time bomb June 19, 2022
Heard News wrote:
https://nos.nl/artikel/2185922-nederlandse-boeren-hebben-laagste-milieu-impact-ter-wereld

https://www.nu.nl/klimaat/6206878/het-gaat-slecht-met-de-nederlandse-natuur-maar-er-gloort-ook-hoop.html
Now just say what you want to say unheard of man.
Heard News June 24, 2022
Thank you for your substantive contribution regarding these conflicting articles.

Didn't seem very hard to understand for farmers who have to solve climate change and like all workers can still think for themselves whether to stone the message or the unheard messenger.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

News Nitrogen

KDW from law and emission targets instead of nitrogen targets

Opinions Wim Groot Koerkamp

Top-down meets bottom-up in nitrogen impasse

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register