Shutterstock

News nitrogen

Nitrogen experts D66: no need to shrink livestock

10 August 2022 - Klaas van der Horst - 7 comments

Emeritus nitrogen professors Han Lindeboom and Johan Sanders want to achieve the cabinet's nitrogen targets for livestock farming through innovation and without reducing livestock numbers. This is stated in a plan that they will present on Texel to VVD MPs Sophie Hermans (group chairman) and Thom van Campen.

This reports The Telegraph. Lindeboom and Sanders are members of the Focus Group Stikstof, which was previously associated with D66. Member of Parliament Tjeerd de Groot distanced himself from them because, according to Lindeboom, there was a difference of opinion about the goals. "We can easily support the government's goal of achieving a 39.000-tonne nitrogen emission reduction by 2034," says Sanders in De Telegraaf. He and Lindeboom propose using much less nitrogen from artificial fertilizers and imported animal feed and still achieving the same level of innovation through innovations. yields in livestock and arable farming.

In their report, they put forward nine innovations to reduce nitrogen emissions. This includes the use of more essential amino acids in feed for pigs and chickens, which significantly reduces the nitrogen content in the manure. This is a proven technique. Other proposals include the use of beet tops as animal feed and growing more grass with leguminous plants (clover). Good results have already been achieved in Ireland, according to Sanders.

Lindeboom is also critical of RIVM's nitrogen calculations and points to a study by TNO, which also questions this. The cabinet has now asked members of parliament Caroline van der Plas and Pieter Omtzigt why the cabinet has not taken note of this and has not included this scientific criticism in its policy.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Klaas van der Horst

Klaas van der Horst is a passionate follower of the dairy market and everything related to it. He searches for the news and interprets the developments.
Comments
7 comments
Subscriber
smart ass 10 August 2022
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk/artikel/10900029/stikstofexperts-d66-krimp-livestock-not-necessary]Nitrogen experts D66: no need to shrink livestock[/url]
why are those 9 innovations not described here?
Subscriber
Zeeuw 10 August 2022
See that's another language. I call this artificiality of the RIVM scientific manipulation in 2022 . Also for the KDW, the foreign experts under the chairmanship of Prof Klaas de Smidt , report Dobven et al 2008 , already indicated in their review (page 2008 of the appendix ) in 76 that a habitat normally has a variation of 100 mol/ha/year = 1400 grams can. In doing so, they subtly pointed out to the scientists that figures after the decimal point were only for influencing politicians
Subscriber
anna 10 August 2022
Innovation!! Until now without result, while innovation has been applied for years. Innovation is not a solution, it is a direct cost increase. Take beet leaves now. For this, the arable farmer has to incur more costs to have this foliage processed. Reimbursing these extra costs by the livestock sector is a matter of market forces, so it is very unclear. And due to the expected beet tax, fewer beets will probably be grown in the future. Grass with clover is a realistic measure, but clover holds up best with grazing. This also happens in Ireland, where there is really much less mowing. Ireland is a grassland country. Or one should say that here they are going to a system with compulsory grazing. But that's one thing! Grazing is the best measure to reduce nitrogen.
Noud Maas 10 August 2022
Is trap!
With this tactic, the existing reduction figures remain untouched and people go on a technological tour to reduce emissions. That is always debatable and also gives judges leeway.
I already know a case of a dairy farmer, where this actually took place: the judge ruled that there was only a 'theoretical reduction' that had not been sufficiently demonstrated in practice. The dairy farmer in question still had to make reductions, despite major investments.
Fight on now:
Reduction rates down is the only thing that really helps.
Subscriber
Concerned citizen 11 August 2022
Given that politics is about the soil and not about actually reducing nitrogen or preserving nature, there is a good chance that nothing will happen with all these wonderful innovations.
Subscriber
Zeeuw 11 August 2022
Innovations do work if they are implemented correctly. The Lely system can make a major contribution! Other stable systems, such as spraying water on slats and accelerated manure removal, really work, but must be applied correctly. Mandatory grazing would be fine. Landscape also beautifully decorated and lower N emissions than buildings! The judges demand that innovation N reduction must be demonstrated and it is believed that the inaccurate measurement and calculation models of RIVM still have > 25% margin of error. Pennies of the first order!
Bert 14 August 2022
Noud Maas wrote:
Is trap!
With this tactic, the existing reduction figures remain untouched and people go on a technological tour to reduce emissions. That is always debatable and also gives judges leeway.
I already know a case of a dairy farmer, where this actually took place: the judge ruled that there was only a 'theoretical reduction' that had not been sufficiently demonstrated in practice. The dairy farmer in question still had to make reductions, despite major investments.
Fight on now:
Reduction rates down is the only thing that really helps.
Conscious trap.

Thanks to those who really contribute and are not blatant professional liars
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

News Nitrogen

KDW from law and emission targets instead of nitrogen targets

Opinions Wim Groot Koerkamp

Top-down meets bottom-up in nitrogen impasse

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register