Emeritus nitrogen professors Han Lindeboom and Johan Sanders want to achieve the cabinet's nitrogen targets for livestock farming through innovation and without reducing livestock numbers. This is stated in a plan that they will present on Texel to VVD MPs Sophie Hermans (group chairman) and Thom van Campen.
This reports The Telegraph. Lindeboom and Sanders are members of the Focus Group Stikstof, which was previously associated with D66. Member of Parliament Tjeerd de Groot distanced himself from them because, according to Lindeboom, there was a difference of opinion about the goals. "We can easily support the government's goal of achieving a 39.000-tonne nitrogen emission reduction by 2034," says Sanders in De Telegraaf. He and Lindeboom propose using much less nitrogen from artificial fertilizers and imported animal feed and still achieving the same level of innovation through innovations. yields in livestock and arable farming.
In their report, they put forward nine innovations to reduce nitrogen emissions. This includes the use of more essential amino acids in feed for pigs and chickens, which significantly reduces the nitrogen content in the manure. This is a proven technique. Other proposals include the use of beet tops as animal feed and growing more grass with leguminous plants (clover). Good results have already been achieved in Ireland, according to Sanders.
Lindeboom is also critical of RIVM's nitrogen calculations and points to a study by TNO, which also questions this. The cabinet has now asked members of parliament Caroline van der Plas and Pieter Omtzigt why the cabinet has not taken note of this and has not included this scientific criticism in its policy.
© DCA Market Intelligence. This market information is subject to copyright. It is not permitted to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or make the content available to third parties for compensation, in any form, without the express written permission of DCA Market Intelligence.
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk/artikel/10900029/stikstofexperts-d66-krimp-livestock-not-necessary]Nitrogen experts D66: no need to shrink livestock[/url]
Is trap!
With this tactic, the existing reduction figures remain untouched and people go on a technological tour to reduce emissions. That is always debatable and also gives judges leeway.
I already know a case of a dairy farmer, where this actually took place: the judge ruled that there was only a 'theoretical reduction' that had not been sufficiently demonstrated in practice. The dairy farmer in question still had to make reductions, despite major investments.
Fight on now:
Reduction rates down is the only thing that really helps.