Shutterstock

Background nitrogen mood

Always a nitrogen stick to hit the farmer with

15 August 2025 - Klaas van der Horst - 13 comments

It's that time of year again when the heather blooms a beautiful purple, but there are also a lot of grasses and shrubs on the heath. According to many national newspapers, glossy magazines, and online reports, this is a result of too much nitrogen. Nitrogen also seriously damages butterfly populations, as we heard earlier this year, but that was mainly based on counts from 2024. However, the Butterfly Foundation recently reported that the current pesticide pressure is also very extreme.

The Dutch agricultural sector seems to have a lot of explaining to do. Unfortunately, there's also a lot to explain to those who are easily fooled by cheap framing, deliberate deception, and the omission of relevant facts. Just to start.

Wolf and complaining citizen cause heath to become overgrown with grass
Heathland in the Netherlands is largely a cultivated landscape. The vast purple expanses of heathland are practically impossible without flocks of sheep (which graze them) or periodic mechanical sod cutting. Otherwise, they become overgrown. However, sheep flocks in heathlands are increasingly struggling due to complaints from citizens (for example, in Elspeet) and – not to forget – the wolf. Counts of consumed game are nonexistent, but there are counts of other animals, and sheep are at the top of the menu. Mechanical sod cutting is expensive and polluting, although nitrogen emissions are apparently not included in official statistics for "nature restoration."

Butterfly Foundation can't count
The insect population doesn't seem to be developing well, but it also fluctuates with the years. This is due to temperature, humidity, and other factors. Last year, for example, the butterfly population suffered greatly from the cold and wet spring, but nitrogen was largely attributed. This year, it's doing much better. That a club like the Butterfly Foundation It's striking that the foundation is now releasing such an alarming report. At first glance, the findings seem downright alarming, but a closer look reveals the foundation is tripping over itself: calculation factors have been mixed up, tested substances appear to have been selectively chosen (and omitted), and all sorts of claims are being made about areas that haven't been investigated.

NGO is no-go
When the Agrifacts Foundation When questions were raised about this, the report was first quietly amended and then removed from the website. Then came the news that the author had allegedly been threatened. Such a thing is reprehensible, but such a signal can't be the end of all discussion. Nevertheless, an acknowledgement of errors remains elusive. Anyone who thought a national newspaper or other broad media outlet would now pose critical questions to the Butterfly Foundation will be disappointed. An NGO is apparently a no-go. 
And if there is no grassy heathland - thanks to neglected management, and no butterfly alarm on dubious grounds - then there are always other Job's news stories in the arsenal to feed the uninquisitive news distributor and his clientele.

Tier 1 keeps cow in stable
For example, Statistics Netherlands (CBS) published a report with neatly justified figures about the rapidly declining grazing, complete with graphs and bar charts. Shame on you, farmer, wrong again! Unfortunately, barely a word was devoted to the reasoning behind this. It is that due to the current focus on CO2 reduction in the dairy industry, it is becoming increasingly less attractive to let cows graze. For those familiar with the jargon: it is disastrous for theTier-1 emissions'. As a result, the CO2 picture is no longer accurate, and the farmer receives less milk money. The bank isn't happy about that either.

Wrong sector must deliver
Sometimes the impression arises that – according to the prevailing media and NGO narratives – the entire agricultural sector must be rotten, especially in the Netherlands. There's a nitrogen stick for every day, and besides that, there's plenty wrong with it. But meanwhile, the modern consumer, who has to maintain his or her weight with Ozempic, wants a quick fix every now and then. high protein dose, increasingly at the command of a fashionable glucose tracker (once intended for diabetes patients, but now a trendy gadget). Nutrition doesn't always have to be plant-based to be, but always available.

It remains to be seen how many of the aforementioned frustrations and desires will be reflected in the various election manifestos of the national parties. Normal political life remains at a standstill. The cabinet is slowly starting to get back to business, but the next meeting of the Schoof Committee (MCEN) has reportedly been postponed again. It will be a major undertaking to finalize all the plans and budgets for Budget Day.

Political disputes and transfers
Meanwhile, the parliamentary elections at the end of October are not only shaking up election platforms, but things certainly don't look good for agriculture. Tensions are arising within parties, for example, at DENK, where the party is in conflict with the party leadership, and at the Party for the Animals, which is being flanked by a kind of revived Party for the Animals. There are also turmoil within the VVD, where party leader Dilan Yesilgöz is facing poor polls. There are also transfers of sitting MPs: for example, from NSC to JA21 and BBB. Even potential candidates, whether real or perceived, are being canvassed for a spot on the list. For example, the current chair of the NAJK, who has never been caught doing anything out of the ordinary, is said to have been approached by the CDA. Incidentally, that party has suddenly been doing very well in the polls in recent weeks, but is also increasingly less of a farmers' or rural party.

From shrinkage to conservation
Another transfer is that of Erwin Wunnekink, chairman of the LTO dairy farming sector association, to Nevedi, the umbrella organization for the animal feed sector. As director, he will have to present a different message there than he did at LTO. Although his influence on LTO's policy appears to be limited, he advocated for the sector's downsizing there—whether under pressure from the collective or not. Nevedi is less enthusiastic about this, at least not so far. However, it does align with the vision of his previous employer. FrieslandCampina also does not support a shrinking livestock population. 
 

 
 

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Klaas van der Horst

He is a dairy market specialist at DCA Market Intelligence. He researches market news and trends and interprets developments.
Comments
13 comments
Subscriber
Pete 15 August 2025
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/melk/artikel/10913689/altijd-wel-een-stikstofstok-om-de-boer-mee-te-slaan]Always a nitrogen stick to hit the farmer with[/url]
After Vedder, CDA is of course looking for another cuddly farmer
Subscriber
sefO 15 August 2025
I think Vedder felt taken advantage of by the CDA and LTO. These two parties, along with Holman of NSC, did everything they could to thwart BBB and Wiersma. Now Vedder is stepping down, Holman is stepping down, and LTO is washing its hands of it. And yes, the farmers are once again left empty-handed, and they pay hefty contributions for that. It's all incomprehensible!
Subscriber
juun 15 August 2025
You could also accept the buyout plan once and then stop when you want to, allowing everyone who wants to continue to do so. This way, it would take another 30 years before the issue was finally resolved.
frans 15 August 2025
the butterfly population is also very low in the cities, do something about that
Subscriber
time bomb 15 August 2025
They should leave nitrogen alone, but do something about plastic, including in the Netherlands. There are also biodegradable plastics. That supports farmers, and lets the oil trade slow down a bit. There are still questions about nitrogen, but none about plastic, as you can see on TV.
Subscriber
quite coarse 17 August 2025
Yes, as a sector, we're weak, and it's partly our own fault. We sat back for too long while the environmental defense and later the postcode lottery launched their direct or indirect attacks. Now that that well-oiled machine is doing its job, we're left with some disorganized floundering. Organizations like the nitrogen claim foundation and the Agrifacts foundation are invaluable to us, but as a sector, we're too stingy to collectively throw a few million euros at them. And yes, that's how the Vollebroekjes, the old hands, and many TV programs will get you in the nuts as a sector. So, fill up those pots of money belonging to organizations that do have our best interests at heart to reverse this negativity. After all, no one can survive without us, but we'll also have to adapt, and the consumer will have to reward us financially.
Subscriber
criticism 17 August 2025
Let's just bring all our food across the border, because maybe they'll appreciate it. Then the complainers can eat foreign food, which is much better, or else they'll go hungry.
Subscriber
Law 18 August 2025
You achieve beautiful heathland by maintaining it. For centuries, this was done by "sod cutting." This prevented undesirable plants and emerging trees and shrubs from developing. The soil remained poor this way. Nowadays, the heathland has to remain "heath" on its own... it composts itself to death. It's easier to blame the nitrogen.
Subscriber
Susanne Jansen 18 August 2025
Shrinkage doesn't have to be the goal in itself! If enough farms operate in a "nature-inclusive" manner, the nitrogen problem will disappear like snow in the sun. Nature-inclusive means enabling your farm to maximize grazing. Grazing is THE solution to the nitrogen problem. It's the cheap and effective alternative to the (ineffective and far too expensive) low-emission flooring ("during grazing, cows poop here and pee there"). Moreover, the entire risk of the ineffective low-emission flooring lies on the farm. The grazing dairy farm ensures (bio)diversity between farms. For forty years, our sector has been faced with rising costs due to all sorts of pointless (mandatory) investments aimed at nitrogen reduction. This began sometime in the 1980s with the injection of liquid manure, then nitrate. Later came the use of manure silos for winter storage, followed by covering manure silos, incorporating manure into arable land, nitrogen rights, and phosphate rights—all investments intended to reduce nitrogen emissions. Apparently, all of this was for nothing; the nitrogen debate is now more heated than ever! The advice at the time, primarily from the banks, but also from the Dutch Federation of Agriculture and Horticulture (LTO), was to address these rising costs by scaling up. Now that farms have grown (significantly), the debate within society is more heated than ever. Therefore, the advice to the government is: invest in dairy farms with sufficient land for grazing cows. Generally, farms will then remain smaller, which is also beneficial for rural liveability. The major problem now is that barns are becoming vacant, and municipalities are at a loss as to how to solve this problem.
Subscriber
time bomb 18 August 2025
Susanne Jansen wrote:
Shrinkage doesn't have to be the goal in itself! If enough farms operate in a "nature-inclusive" manner, the nitrogen problem will disappear like snow in the sun. Nature-inclusive means enabling your farm to maximize grazing. Grazing is THE solution to the nitrogen problem. It's the cheap and effective alternative to the (ineffective and far too expensive) low-emission flooring ("during grazing, cows poop here and pee there"). Moreover, the entire risk of the ineffective low-emission flooring lies on the farm. The grazing dairy farm ensures (bio)diversity between farms. For forty years, our sector has been faced with rising costs due to all sorts of pointless (mandatory) investments aimed at nitrogen reduction. This began sometime in the 1980s with the injection of liquid manure, then nitrate. Later came the use of manure silos for winter storage, followed by covering manure silos, incorporating manure into arable land, nitrogen rights, and phosphate rights—all investments intended to reduce nitrogen emissions. Apparently, all of this was for nothing; the nitrogen debate is now more heated than ever! The advice at the time, primarily from the banks, but also from the Dutch Federation of Agriculture and Horticulture (LTO), was to address these rising costs by scaling up. Now that farms have grown (significantly), the debate within society is more heated than ever. Therefore, the advice to the government is: invest in dairy farms with sufficient land for grazing cows. Generally, farms will then remain smaller, which is also beneficial for rural liveability. The major problem now is that barns are becoming vacant, and municipalities are at a loss as to how to solve this problem.
What a weak and stupid story. Member of the Labour Party (PvdD), the NSC, or GreenLeft, I'm sure. You shouldn't dismiss livestock farmers as stupid. Weaklings!
Subscriber
arable farmer 19 August 2025
I sometimes wonder where in the world there might be a nitrogen shortage. I can't find the answer anywhere. There are 100 of them on this planet (so to speak). If there's too much nitrogen in the Netherlands, there must be less elsewhere.
Subscriber
time bomb 19 August 2025
Farmer wrote:
I sometimes wonder where in the world there might be a nitrogen shortage. I can't find the answer anywhere. There are 100 of them on this planet (so to speak). If there's too much nitrogen in the Netherlands, there must be less elsewhere.
That's true, there are plenty of countries that aren't in need of N. They should leave agriculture alone and stop sowing unrest. Time will tell. We all deserve the chance to make things right for everyone.
Subscriber
frog 19 August 2025
Susanne Jansen wrote:
Shrinkage doesn't have to be the goal in itself! If enough farms operate in a "nature-inclusive" manner, the nitrogen problem will disappear like snow in the sun. Nature-inclusive means enabling your farm to maximize grazing. Grazing is THE solution to the nitrogen problem. It's the cheap and effective alternative to the (ineffective and far too expensive) low-emission flooring ("during grazing, cows poop here and pee there"). Moreover, the entire risk of the ineffective low-emission flooring lies on the farm. The grazing dairy farm ensures (bio)diversity between farms. For forty years, our sector has been faced with rising costs due to all sorts of pointless (mandatory) investments aimed at nitrogen reduction. This began sometime in the 1980s with the injection of liquid manure, then nitrate. Later came the use of manure silos for winter storage, followed by covering manure silos, incorporating manure into arable land, nitrogen rights, and phosphate rights—all investments intended to reduce nitrogen emissions. Apparently, all of this was for nothing; the nitrogen debate is now more heated than ever! The advice at the time, primarily from the banks, but also from the Dutch Federation of Agriculture and Horticulture (LTO), was to address these rising costs by scaling up. Now that farms have grown (significantly), the debate within society is more heated than ever. Therefore, the advice to the government is: invest in dairy farms with sufficient land for grazing cows. Generally, farms will then remain smaller, which is also beneficial for rural liveability. The major problem now is that barns are becoming vacant, and municipalities are at a loss as to how to solve this problem.
I assume you gather the necessary food from the food forest? You don't fly and certainly don't use any medication. Although, given the overpopulation, I would consider setting one up anyway.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current milk prices doing?

View and compare it
in the Milk Price Comparison

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up