Research shows

'Manure rules encourage fraud'

17 January 2018 - Bart-Jan van Zandwijk - 12 comments

The strict and complex manure rules encourage fraud with manure. That is the conclusion of the authors of the report 'Manure fraud under scrutiny', which was published this week in the Government Gazette. 

The researchers Piet Blauw and Marco Korff conclude that the existing manure regulations are extremely complex and that a further increase in the regulations will make enforcement more difficult than improve it. The authors write: "From the conversations we have had, it appears that in part of the sector fraud is being committed collectively by various agricultural entrepreneurs, intermediaries, consultants and fertilizer processors. The approach to this fraud is not very visible to the sector and it is necessary to break through these together.”

Additional regulations should make manure fraud more difficult

Fraud risk
The researchers further conclude that the risk of fraud increases due to the low prices in the pig sector and the high collection fees that livestock farmers pay to dispose of their manure, the stricter application standards in arable farming, the manure processing obligation and the emergence of (mobile) manure separators.

Minister Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality) wants to reduce fraud. The additional regulations are intended to make manure fraud more difficult. The Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality had been aware of the report on manure fraud for some time. The report dates from May 2016, but was published in the Government Gazette in mid-January 2018.

Partly on the basis of these recommendations, the sector has now a plan of action lined up; at the request of Carola Schouten. The sector is currently working on a quality mark for the entire fertilizer chain.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
12 comments
hans 17 January 2018
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/mest/ artikel/10877231/mestreglement-werken-fraude-in-de-hand][/url]
Manure fraud, everyone knew it, but almost no checks and therefore almost no chance of being caught. Why?? Because it is so good for those farmers who are already having such a hard time? The low prices in the pig sector and the high collection fees that livestock farmers pay to get rid of their manure, the stricter application standards in arable farming, the manure processing obligation, oh how pathetic. Or not? No, because who is the most with the manure in the stomach? The big growers, cows, pigs and chickens. The example companies, the companies that are "ready for the future". But with strict enforcement there was no future for those companies at all. And that would put the banking sector at risk. And in The Hague, just like Shell and Unilever according to the dividend soap, it has a major contribution. Manure, a complex matter, or just a conspiracy?
mark 17 January 2018
manure is not a problem created by the rules. if the standard is raised to what the plant needs, there is no surplus and everything is solved and with the right resources / machines brought to the land, there is even no more leaching. the farmers are treated like criminals bah bah
eureka 17 January 2018
Just abolish the rules and there will be no more fraud.
hans 17 January 2018
Just abolish the rules, then you will no longer have Dutch.
pete s 18 January 2018
That's what Europe is for
Padre 18 January 2018
With us, the big fraudsters just continue. A contractor and a few large pig and cow farmers don't care about anything. The big money beckons to fraud. In recent years, this contractor has bought at least 100 hectares of additional land. He doesn't do this because of hard work, but he earns it by cheating. The pigs and some cows have only half the manure costs of someone who behaves well . These companies therefore also run large (with the knowledge of Rabobank)
Chief O 18 January 2018
Normal usage standards and there is absolutely no manure surplus, we all know how many nutrients are removed from the land annually, bring that amount back to the land plus a maintenance fertilizer and everything is solved, THE LAND REMAINS IN CONDITION, GOOD YIELDS, LESS OR NO MARKETING COSTS, LITTLE OR NO FRAUD, a disadvantage cartloads of officials about what we can do nothing with
Let's be honest what is currently happening in the sector, it is unjust that a massive smear campaign by the municipality, province, water board and national government is unsustainable.
shoemakers1 18 January 2018
a civil servant is better off in unemployment benefits than at work, so he doesn't do much, but everything he does do you only suffer from
shoemakers1 18 January 2018
the truth is not important to a student, he only assumes what has been given to him, just like a computer, no sense at all
hans 18 January 2018
And shoemakers1, then don't whine when your entitlements are late, or no longer appear on your rc at all.
shoemakers1 18 January 2018
hans, the payment entitlements are a result of the partial compensation of the decreased prices, but you will not want to understand that
hans 18 January 2018
Civil servant rules???
Officer 19 January 2018
Shoemakers, allowances are subsidies for welfare recipients. You understand that too.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register