5 questions for Marc van Doorn

'Fertiliser indispensable in dairy farming'

29 March 2018 - Anne Jan Doorn - 8 comments

Opinions on fertilizers are strongly divided. For example, A-ware recently turned against the use of fertilizers in dairy farming. How does Marc van Doorn, chairman of Fertilizers Netherlands, view the issue?

Zuivelaar A-ware and the Dutch Dairy Farmers' Union (NMV) are making noise against fertilizers and are of the opinion that dairy farming can do without fertilizer. Does fertilizer still have a future in that sector?
"Absolutely, Meststoffen Nederland stands for sustainable fertilization. In our view, animal manure is the basis, supplemented with fertilizer. This is to bring the right nutrients to the crop at the right time. Contrary to the negative sounds of A-Ware and the NMV, only a very small part of the greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farming (about 3%). In addition, the most commonly used fertilizer (CAs) produces negligible ammonia emissions, compared to cow manure. So by using fertilizer, in addition to a basic fertilization with animal manure, you still get the best balance."

Most fertilizer is imported in the form of feed

Does fertilizer fit into circular agriculture?
"Yes. If you make the circle big enough, we supply fertilizer to the arable farmer, who supplies his products to an animal feed company. He then delivers it to the dairy farm, where the product is converted into milk and manure. You make biogas from manure in a fermenter, from which you can make fertilizer.According to the CBS (2015), the main external source of nitrogen is imported concentrate.That is produced with fertilizer from outside the Netherlands.Manufacturer is for the most part the source of the nutrients that our dairy cattle process, either in or outside the Netherlands. Without fertilizer no feed, and therefore no circular agriculture."

What does the future of fertilizer without gas look like?
"At the moment it is economically the most profitable to produce fertilizer on the basis of gas, also in the Netherlands; alternatives are possible based on (green) electricity. However, for the time being this is no less than 3 times as expensive. We also do not have enough electricity and cables to make this switch. It is also important to know that almost all fertilizer in the Netherlands is made on the basis of imported gas, so not on the basis of gas from Groningen."

How realistic is a world without fertilizer?
"Completely unrealistic; fertilizer feeds life in the world. Without fertilizer, there could be 50% fewer people and animals compared to now. However, the world population is expected to grow by a few billion people. That is why Meststoffen Nederland stands for sustainable nourishing life."

What will fertilizer prices be like in the future, if gas prices rise?
"Gas is the most important cost item for nitrogen fertilizers in particular; higher gas prices therefore put upward pressure on fertilizer prices. Since we hardly use gas from Groningen, I am a strong proponent of decoupling the import gas price and the gas price in Groningen† For example, by making gas from Groningen more expensive, the government could promote the switch and solve the problem of reductions in Groningen more quickly."

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Anne-Jan Doorn

Anne Jan Doorn is an arable expert at Boerenbusiness. He writes about the various arable farming markets and also focuses on the land and energy market.
Comments
8 comments
Subscriber
love 29 March 2018
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/mest/ artikel/10878040/kunstmest-onmissbaar-in-melkveehouderij][/url]
The man preaches for his own parish. It is impossible to explain that manure has to be removed and that fertilizer is bought back for this.
If you also consider that approximately 7 BILLION cubic meters of gas is used in the Netherlands by the fertilizer industry for the production of fertilizer.
It was also high time that someone sounded the alarm. Tribute to A-ware, little can be expected from LTO
Look after!! 29 March 2018
Do realize that E-Ware wants to make beautiful decorations for the outside waiting. And then truth is just not important. There is still a whole market to conquer for E-Ware, Ahold is also a money lender for this club. Perhaps the NMV chairman is a supplier of A-Ware.
Arnold 29 March 2018
Totally agree @thieu it is indeed as crooked as something
opa 30 March 2018
every bird sings as it is beaked. { in other words everyone is talking in their own way. It doesn't matter where you come from. And as long as they keep doing that, nothing will change. Everything revolves around commerce these days. Too bad because real knowledge is lost.
herre bartlema 31 March 2018
Fertilizer apparently refers to KAS here. This is a form of plant nutrition that causes a lot of environmental impact during both production and application. That is why it was agreed in Article 2008 in the Clean and Efficient Covenant in 7.5 to work on alternatives. They are happy, come to Wim den Hoed's company in Dordrecht on Monday 9 April for a demo about this, for more info 0651596092 www.precisiebemestingzuidholland.nl
has 31 March 2018
that man speaks so well that he also believes it with his tie and big smile.
Jp lapwing 1 April 2018
With a little bit of common sense we see climate change coming everything must be done to equal or increase the yields per ha
Subscriber
info 1 April 2018
Fertilizer is and remains fertilizer and is made to adjust the growth of a crop and not made to allow a crop to grow completely except for substrate cultivation. With soil belongs organic manure and to keep the soil healthy we do not have to apply artifices and the story above is only true for a small part and the environment is technically no longer of this time, we can just make the minerals from the manure which is useful for the future is better now chicken manure is incinerated that can be done differently.
scrape 2 April 2018
The methane emission by the cow is part of a short carbon cycle. Grass absorbs CO2, cow eats grass, emits CO2 and CH4. CH4 is converted back into CO10 within 2 years. CO2 is taken up again by plants, etc. This is an emission, but does not cause an increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
This is in contrast to the natural gas with which KAS is made. Like all fossil fuels, it has been in the ground for thousands/millions of years and the CO2 that is created during combustion is added extra and causes an increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
The methane emissions that are held responsible for 70% of the contribution from livestock farming may not be counted at all. Only the use of fossil fuels by livestock farming can be seen as a contribution of livestock farming to climate change. The fertilizer production will then be a multiple of the 3% mentioned by Van Doorn.
Fine as a supplement, but having to dispose of cattle manure and supply fertilizer is bizarre. What idiot ever came up with that only 170 kg of N from animal manure can be fertilized and has even managed to record this in Europe. Therein lies the cause of this problem.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Analysis Fertilizer

Import duty drives up price of Russian fertilizer

Analysis Fertilizer

Fertilizer: hardly any demand, price drop in the offing?

Analysis Fertilizer

Higher gas price further boosts fertilizer market

Analysis Fertilizer

Rising fertilizer prices have multiple causes

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register