Agriphoto

News Manure policy

Intensive livestock farmers lose their way in Schouten manure plan

8 September 2020 - Wouter Baan - 16 comments

Agriculture Minister Carola Schouten wants to drastically change manure policy in our country, because the current state of affairs is complex and prone to fraud. The minister wants to move towards a two-track manure policy. A livestock farm is land-bound. If not, all manure must be processed.

The latter has far-reaching consequences for many intensive livestock farmers. A new manure policy requires 'drastic choices', she wrote in a letter to the House of Representatives.

Schouten concludes that the Netherlands will have a manure surplus in 2020 and wants to change that. The groundwater quality has improved in recent decades, but leaching on the sand and loess soils still occurs. As a result, the targets for nitrogen and phosphate are not yet achieved everywhere.

Manure flows susceptible to fraud
Schouten also mentions the fertilizer standards in relation to the various crops, which are often complex. She knows that administrative red tape is also a thing for many farmers. In addition, the manure flows are susceptible to fraud, because removing manure is expensive. 

In short, what it comes down to is that Schouten wants to move towards a land-based agriculture in which cycles are closed. This should come as no surprise, given her earlier vision of circular agriculture. In the new policy there must be room for manure processing products, so that this becomes more profitable. The minister indicated that a new policy requires radical choices. She calls the exceptional positions and the legal safeguarding of the system as challenges.

Two track policy
There must be a two-track policy for land-based and non-land-based companies. The first group deposits the manure on their own land. The second group is obliged to have the manure removed and processed. According to her, this creates transparent manure flows. Now it is often the case that dairy farms remove part of the manure. That will soon no longer be possible. This creates an incentive for dairy farming to become land-bound.

"In the future I envision a fully land-based dairy and beef cattle farming," says Schouten. This thought of Schouten is not new in itself, although she sharply sets out her way of thinking in the letter to parliament. Schouten is thinking of regulations that link the number of cows to the number of hectares a dairy farmer owns. Schouten thinks that pig, poultry and veal farmers opt for mandatory manure processing. This sector therefore needs to be further professionalised. The minister emphasizes in the letter that the plans are being further elaborated.

Click here to read the letter to parliament.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Wouter Job

Wouter Baan is Head of Meat & Dairy at BoerenbusinessAt DCA Market Intelligence, he focuses on dairy, pork, and meat markets. He also monitors (business) developments within agribusiness and interviews CEOs and policymakers.
Comments
16 comments
Subscriber
henk van Zande 8 September 2020
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/mest/ artikel/10889110/intensieve-veehouders-de-klos-in-mestplan-schouten]Intensive livestock farmers in the Schouten manure plan [/url]
does someone want to arrange the GGD for this person...
pig farmer 8 September 2020
Cumela has lobbied hard for extra kilometers of transport. From pig farmer to manure processors back to pig farmer, horticulturist or arable farmer. Thank you cume!!!! Cash register for members or not cumela?!
JBS VLD 8 September 2020
Manure distribution loses a lot of cubic meters of manure due to remediation of pig farms. In exchange, they have received more transport movements and kilometers back. See if we can set up a manure transport cooperative with a number of pig farmers.
Subscriber
Drent 8 September 2020
and what should we, as farmers, fertilize the land with? Now I take part from livestock farmers in collaboration with land exchange, which I think is already a cycle.
Joel 8 September 2020
If I have puzzled correctly, that is only allowed with cattle manure when the cattle farmer returns the crop that is grown on the ground as feed to the cattle farm.

And in other cases, it becomes a fertilizer product that is produced in a fertilizer processing plant. Probably from poultry or pigs.
Subscriber
Skirt 8 September 2020
Good thing, but with the current low margins and high land prices, this is going to be a whole series of bankruptcies in the livestock sector.
Subscriber
January 8 September 2020
and we all take that?/
not really
Subscriber
south farmer 9 September 2020
And this will be the next cost price increase for arable farming.....
Subscriber
grunt 9 September 2020
If anyone knows where our minister lives, I'll bring her a few loads of slurry so that she can process it because she apparently knows exactly how to do it. Now she is already saying that the introduction of the new manure policy will take 10 years, I think it only took 5 minutes to come up with this nonsense. If she asks someone for advice with a practical training (livestock farmer / arable farmer) which is sensible and does not let our theory farmers from Wageningen come up with something, then the sector could be saved a lot of misery.
Subscriber
wig maker 9 September 2020
They should have done 40 years ago, attach legs to ground. Now the turnips are cooked.
Subscriber
xx 11 September 2020
Indeed, linking soil to animals should have been done 40 years ago. They just keep running behind.
It just doesn't stop with these nonsense regulations.
What could be more sustainable and in terms of cycle than to apply your own manure on your own land, even if you are not completely land-bound.
Manure accounting must still be correct.
field 11 September 2020
"Indeed, linking soil to animals should have been done 40 years ago. They just keep lagging behind.
It just doesn't stop with those nonsensical regulations." What was it again? Wasn't it systematically the input from agriculture that measures such as mandatory land-relatedness were complete nonsense? Statement: there are two dangers of a lobby: that it is too weak is either too strong Too weak is detrimental in the short term Too strong is severely detrimental in the long term
Subscriber
January 11 September 2020
but if my neighbor is a farmer and I am a livestock farmer and he would like fertilizer to improve his soil
WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT ?
11 September 2020
This is another example of legislation and regulations that increase costs. The cost increase is again due to the revenue model that our periphery can attach to this.

If we as Dutch agriculture want to be able to sell our products competitively in the international market, then we have to cut the companies and revenue models that are endlessly glued to farms.

It seems that the function of the Dutch farmer is to facilitate the earnings model for the periphery. We are not allowed to receive the profit, but society's criticism of the production method is. Taking so many risks to create money and employment for others, it's really crazy work.
edkar 23 September 2020
and cooperation of arable farmer (neighbor) cow farmer that just works?? dung on his land I buy the corn from him etc
New reality for workers. 26 September 2020
our country should be a Christian culture, vvd makes it a den of robbers on behalf of the new kingdom of Europe

every time,

redo the homework of sick arrogance ruling toddlers
out of here..
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up