Shutterstock

Opinions Harm Wientjes

Wanting to be the leader in the world

30 April 2019 - Boerenbusiness - 3 comments

'Wanting to be the frontrunner in the world'. Actually, that is an unintended result of generations of farmers (sons) who are driven to make something of it. This driven attitude is what I am most proud of as a Dutch entrepreneur. And, I think that's also our best trademark.

On the other hand, it is also a property that we no longer necessarily need in the welfare state. In addition, the property apparently creates more friction with foreign parties who set goals other than food security. This is because the requirements for sustainability are almost nowhere as high as in our country. So in the Netherlands we are also at the forefront of this.

High demands
Society sets high standards and sets a lower economic and ecological price in return. In a project group of DLV Advies I want to find solutions for this, among other things by looking for innovations for our customers with which they can meet the wishes of society. An example of such an innovation that I think is cool is strip cultivation on GPS. Different crops are grown side by side.

After all, with the use of GPS you no longer necessarily have to think in large blocks, although you do have to take into account the working widths of the operations and the space you need to be able to harvest properly. This is a good principle to break through monocultures and to promote natural biodiversity, without making concessions to the return for the farmer. You may even get a better return, because crops become more resistant to diseases and fungi.

Or what do you think of Connecting Agri & Food's Smart Stable, which recently received a German innovation prize. The system measures emissions and animal health in real time. Based on this, it can make a manure scraper run extra, ventilate harder and/or set the temperature one degree lower. In another project called 'customized mineral concentrate', we extract the mineral ammonium sulphate from slurry, which is suitable for circular fertilizers or circular building materials.

Local manure fermentation
An example in which I am involved myself is the project on local manure fermentation (Jumpstart of Friesland Campina). There were some obstacles to overcome in the beginning, but thanks to the efforts of the entire team and the dairy farmers involved, a reliable technique is available that provides extra returns for the dairy farmer. In addition, it makes an enormous contribution to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy cattle.

The promise at the climate tables is to move towards 1.020 grams of CO2 per kilo of milk, while the world average is about 2.400 grams per kilo. With a manure digester in the yard, you are on average only at 750 grams per kilo. That is why, in my view, the dairy farmer has an important right to continue to produce milk in the future.

Follow-up of phosphate rights
Perhaps the future dairy farmer will have more options in a successive system of phosphate rights? I dare not say that out loud, because who knows what the 4% loudest consumers will be calling for to further restrict livestock farming. But on the other hand, it will come at some point and those 4% critical consumers can also be seen as the 'early warning system'.

In any case, it must be done at such a pace, so as to go hand in hand with a good payment capacity of the farmer and without social suffering from forced quitters. Either way, we should embrace those signals and look for an innovative solution to them that will keep us 'frontrunner' in the world.

Boerenbusiness

below Boerenbusiness opinions are posted from authors who, in principle, give their opinion once Boerenbusiness.nl or from people who prefer to remain anonymous. Name and place of residence are always known to the editors.
Comments
3 comments
Ton Westgeest 30 April 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10882267/de-koploper-in-de-wereld-willen-zijn]Wanting to be the leader in the world[/url]
What a strange story;
"That is why, in my view, the dairy farmer has an important right to continue to produce milk in the future."

Right to produce milk???

If we have a manure digester???

As long as we make 4% of the loudest consumers (read, action groups) happy??

As long as we keep saying yes to the regulatory greed of the dairies (read Postcode Lottery)??

If we just keep accepting the wrong figures from PBL, WUR, and other government bodies???

If we just keep taking everything from a wandering government without vision and clarity????

But .... do we still want, I mean .... the right, to produce milk in the future???????
Gerald 1 May 2019
Ton, it must be a generation difference. My grandfather didn't want to get on the tractor either and my dad saw that it was necessary to come along. My dad didn't want to use the GPS while I now reap the benefits and my dad doesn't want to be without it anymore. (Maybe my daughter wants to implement strip cultivation later, I don't know how I feel about that now..)

Young farmers want to move forward, and they see that this must now be done together with the environment. Society is no longer as dependent on agriculture as it was 50 years ago, we are a minority and must realize that the members of a Natuurmonumenten have ten times more members than there are farmers. And in a democracy that also means a ten times greater vote in where we are going with the Netherlands.

Now we can be pathetic that agriculture is no longer heard, but young farmers do not want to be pathetic at all. They want to move forward, and they want to adapt. Being able to adapt, an aspect that is also mentioned in the story of Harm Wientjes, must remain realistic and affordable.

Robust business operations are not the most simple, but a correct overall picture in which the technical and financial results are just as important as the social appreciation. Because however you get used to it, you get a lot of farmer's pride from social appreciation!
Ton Westgeest 1 May 2019
Gerald, you can now portray me as a grandfather who doesn't want to get on the trigger, I just see that every change generates so much resistance that it is no longer workable in the long run.

Young farmers want to move forward, yes logically.....but can they? Larger evokes resistance, it must be smaller. Barn slats evoke resistance, they have to be on straw. Plowing evokes resistance, it must remain grassland. Minks, rabbits, chickens, calves all create resistance, even if they are kept to the highest standards. Cows inside, which was innovation after all, have to go outside again. You had to spread fertilizer more, from the agricultural extension service (later DLG), now no more. Spraying is no longer allowed, just growing resilient (!!!!) products. You have to drag feet and then you don't. They no longer want large organic companies, they have to be small family companies, but they are killing them precisely.
Breaking through monocultures, you can say something, but what is the reality (Zembla) how can you grow everything together? With drift, if it is even 200 mtr. can be found further down in the living rooms. GPS does not take drift into account! A lot is possible with GPS, but small corners and strip cultivation with increasingly bulky machines, is that reality?
Every solution has two, and in the society we have now ended up in, there are several sides that are in conflict with each other.....
But we still want the shelves full in the stores.....

I myself have Gerald, a robust business management with good technical and financial results and....... also a lot of social appreciation.
But peasant pride.......nah I'm slowly getting done with it!!!
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register