Shutterstock

Opinions Meeting Farmer Two

A basic allowance in addition to the payment entitlements

14 February 2021 - Boerenbusiness - 15 comments

For some 60 years now, policy incentives and advice to Dutch farmers by farm owners and banks have been aimed at increasing scale. As a result, their companies have grown very strongly in size, number of animals and invested capital. Most farmers lagged behind in direct operating result. 

To this day, premiums and delivery conditions are based on size and numbers. More hectares means more payment entitlements. This puts the somewhat smaller farmer, who is just barely keeping his head above water, at a disadvantage. He receives a minimum supplement from the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The larger farmer easily gets double that, while he can produce cheaper anyway. This system is constantly under discussion. But how do you clean up all those ingrained government incentives to scale up?

Take the division of the cap pot thoroughly on the shovel. Reduce the payment entitlements in 10 years to a maximum allowance of €25.000 per company. Enter a conditional 'Basic Fee' at the same time as the start of the transition period. The conditions for the basic remuneration are a minimum size and a set of result obligations. The annual base fee is equal to the maximum allowance - €25.000 and is indexed annually. 

Farmers voluntarily participate in the conditions to receive the basic compensation. If they do not, they will receive the hectare allowance up to the maximum set.

What are the conditions?
As a farmer you work at least 10 hectares as a lower limit. This is necessary in order to have a certain degree of minimum company size in order to meet the conditions. Of those 10 hectares (most companies have more than 10 hectares in use), at least 5 hectares is permanent herb grassland.

Arable farmers choose a relevant crop that meets the same goals, namely capturing CO2 and promoting biodiversity. In addition, you plant and maintain at least 250 native trees and 1.000 native shrubs on your farm. This can be done, for example, through a forest, rows of trees, woodland or hedges. This also promotes biodiversity and the capture of CO2.  

You also ensure an excess water storage capacity of at least 2.500 m3. For example, by enlarging a ditch or constructing a pool. This temporary water storage can reduce the concentrations of substances in surface water and can possibly be used during dry periods. Finally, you do not use artificial fertilizers or chemical crop protection products on your company (with the exception of one location), which in turn benefits biodiversity, soil and surface water.

Stable foundation laid
This could be the set of conditions. This largely meets objectives in the field of biodiversity, water storage, emissions and runoff, CO2 storage and nitrogen fixation. The lower yield per hectare is met and a stable foundation is laid, which can also be used by smaller companies. Of course, the basic compensation can be extended with specific landscape packages such as botanical hay meadows, agroforestry, field margins or, for example, a postponed mowing date. 

Mind you, it remains voluntary. Those who do not participate are simply entitled to a hectare allowance up to the stipulated maximum. 

Opting for collective interest
Globally, about 30.000 farmers can participate with the current CAP funds. That is more than enough. Naturally, this system encounters resistance from farmers who want to continue with economies of scale and see the CAP as a welcome additional financing. I understand that, but I opt for the collective interest of offering more Dutch farmers a stable perspective. 

Social wishes change quickly and are often based on mood-building and gut feelings. The current CAP system distributes subsidies without relation to the farmer's income. It is under heavy attack and will continue to be adapted. What do you think, does the Basic Allowance offer together with the Northwestern European chain production what I wrote about earlier give us more perspective and stability as farmers?

This article is part of the content collaboration between Boerenbusiness en foodlog.

Boerenbusiness

below Boerenbusiness opinions are posted from authors who, in principle, give their opinion once Boerenbusiness.nl or from people who prefer to remain anonymous. Name and place of residence are always known to the editors.
Comments
15 comments
Subscriber
frog 14 February 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10891027/basic allowance-instead of allowances]Basic allowance instead of entitlements[/url]
Take advantage of another 10 years and then let them burst with their 25.000€ not worth the effort given the ridiculous conditions.
gash 14 February 2021
No, I would not dare to publish this column under my own name.
Subscriber
Narcos 14 February 2021
Can't this meeting farmer just go to work in a healthy way instead of hinting at subsidy on agriculture back in time.

Linking support to land value would be better. high yield high cost for land is high compensation contribution.
noord 14 February 2021
why voluntarily opt for a maximum allowance of €25000 and meet a mountain of conditions, while otherwise, as you say, you can get more according to the old system? Then you should be able to get a fair income of about a ton or more according to the new system, right? don't understand, please answer!
Subscriber
Skirt 14 February 2021
Free enterprise has evaporated in NL
Subscriber
Rob 14 February 2021
Abolish those subsidies, zero to agriculture and zero to nature bastards!! As soon as these clubs no longer receive subsidies, the whole environmental nonsense story will also be gone. They only care about power and money, everything these green pushers touch or offer turns into one big chaos.
Subscriber
Peer 14 February 2021
As far as I'm concerned, this conference farmer has completely lost its way. He needs help, hope the editors of BB - they know
who the writer is - him
will help in that.
Subscriber
Drent 14 February 2021
the name says it all, knowledge of meetings but no business sense, what nonsense.
real grower 14 February 2021
what nonsense , all agriculture is being destroyed by the many pen lickers who shove everything on the farmer .
look at it with sober eyes.
build plenty of new housing estates on the best grounds in Europe.
all citizens have a petrified garden all 2/3 times a year by plane on vacation / all 2/3 cars per family etc.
and then the farmer would have to start planting shrubs/ponds/trees with a piece of string... on his land of 10 euros or more per m2. Suffocate that full of what thinks it knows well what the farmer should and can do.
leave this to one professional and no one else, that is the farmer himself. If we have to work at a cost price that is at or even well below the cost price, then we must achieve the maximum of one square meter. because people want to eat their necks as cheaply as possible. mouth full of sustainability and when they are in the store they drop dead because of something that is 1 cents more expensive. see planetproof, people simply leave it alone is too expensive in the store, and the farmer looks 5 of the quality mark is only a checkout for the inventor himself.
that's how the Netherlands works. come and learn from a farmer who quickly pierces through!!!We are now well on our way to turning the neck around on all family businesses very sad I am not talking about the companies where everything leases and amef/fortis etc is.
pure family/family companies healthy own money/capital that can just keep the business running, the job satisfaction and drive slowly disappear because we have to do everything....
we've worked so much on the road, it's never good. go to aircraft/industry/Staatsbosbeheer collects millions of what was for the farmers there you hear no one about let this occur. put it in the newspaper, etc., but don't make the farmer blacker every time.
if we have to feed humanity for next to nothing let us fertilize what we have to fertilize to meet the needs of the soil
Subscriber
the fries 14 February 2021
I couldn't have written it better
Subscriber
xx 14 February 2021
Indeed Rob, get rid of all those nonsense rules and get rid of those subsidies
Subscriber
howl 14 February 2021
Is it 25000 euros or 250000 euros. Proposal let's go back, 60 years ago okay, then also the cost-return ratio ensures success. Please respond
Subscriber
frog 15 February 2021
stop all subsidies starting with the salaries of 65% of our civil servants who are completely unnecessary.
time bomb 15 February 2021
Completely agree frog, they only come up with far-reaching regulations and mischief
Subscriber
JD4240S 2 March 2021
I am curious about your opinion. As a private individual I have an acre of land around my house on a stream, which I now rent out to a dairy farmer. Suppose I choose to fill this with trees, shrubs, etc. What would you think as a farmer? Or is it perhaps interesting for a dairy farmer to do nature management by renting this?
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News GLB

Nature groups force investigation into CAP

Politics GLB

Advice: redistribute European agricultural subsidies

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register