Shutterstock

Opinions Jaap Major

The only revenue model for farmers is doubling prices

12 September 2022 - Boerenbusiness - 6 comments

A group of scientists believes that nitrogen precipitation should be tackled even more rigorously. It's strange these scientists are talking about nitrogen, but don't think about what's really going on.

Much nature has been created to realize the desired nature of the nature authorities. The wish is very poor nature, where a rare plant can settle. A special plant for the Netherlands, because the Netherlands has naturally fertile, nitrogen-rich soils. After all, the rivers have deposited their fertile sludge on our land for millions of years. In the past, areas of land were impoverished by the farmers, because due to a lack of fertilizers, they sod and graze areas of land. This is how our moors were created. Because there are now fertilizers, the farmers no longer do that and the grasses start growing again in the places where the heath is located. In order to realize the desired nature, our nature managers have taken a very drastic approach. They have excavated the complete cultivation layer, which has arisen over millions of years, with the idea of ​​realizing poor nature again. The consequences of this nature management are disastrous for all forms of plants. After all, by removing the cultivation layer, the soil has lost its fertility.

Grassland is a top performer in capturing CO2
In addition to nitrogen, all other minerals necessary for plant growth have been lost. The rare plant also hardly wants to grow anymore and the desired nature is not realized. It is very easy to say: nitrogen is to blame for covering up the mismanagement of nature reserves. If you want to save nature, drastic measures are needed. Such as fertilizing with lime, gypsum or rock flour and rebuilding a cultivation layer. So that nature can retain minerals again, and don't forget water. I even read an article that nature managers are spreading nitrogen in their nature reserves, to see whether they can achieve better nature in this way. The scientists are also not talking about global warming and water retention.

Far away, our farmers' lands store the most CO2 and water, much more than forests. The nature reserves that were created for desired nature do not capture CO2 and water at all. Grassland in particular is a top performer in capturing CO2 and water. If you are going to convert agricultural land into nature or built-up areas, this will actually amplify global warming and a loss of water. Government, this can't be the intention, can it? Do not be guided by the nature authorities, but first take a course - given by an independent body that knows the business - so that you can make an informed decision. This also applies to the members of the Council of State. Take the abolition of the derogation. The consequences are an increase in CO2 and loss of water, because the farmers will convert their grassland into maize land for optimal nutrition of their livestock.

Halving the livestock is doubling the food price
Don't forget: our farmers harvest a cut of grass six times. In the other EU countries, farmers are happy with two to three cuts of grass. If you compare these yields, the derogation is still more than normal. In order to continue to realize these yields, much more fertilizer will be needed, resulting in a significant increase in CO2. For example, food prices turn out even higher due to the extra costs. Agriculture minister Henk Staghouwer had promised to publish a plan with a revenue model for the farmers, who according to the map of nitrogen minister Christianne van der Wal should start farming in an environmentally friendly way. Logically, he left. The only revenue model with a halving of the livestock is more than a doubling of the prices. How can the consumer still pay for this? Do half the Dutch population have to report to the food bank? But, how does the food bank still get food?

The Dutch farmer can actually be the solution to the CO2 problem, capturing water and nature. Let him burp as much as possible and stimulate him to get the organic matter of his soil as high as possible. Consult and pay him if he builds and manages nature on part of his land.

Jaap Major
Low Zuthem

Boerenbusiness

Under Boerenbusiness opinions are posted from authors who, in principle, give their opinion once Boerenbusiness.nl or from people who prefer to remain anonymous. Name and place of residence are always known to the editors.
Comments
6 comments
Subscriber
anna 13 September 2022
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10900567/enige-earningmodel-voor-boer-is-doubling-prices]The only earning model for farmers is doubling prices[/url]
Dear Jaap, "the only revenue model for farmers is doubling prices". I disagree with you!! Let's do something on the cost side first. We incur far too many costs around manure. Injecting, interim storage, transport, removal of manure, soil bonding, all kinds of (necessary) rights, etc., etc. This is an increase in the cost price. But also the often very expensive stables that are built with far too much "nonsense" in it or processed. So is innovation. This is a direct cost increase with an enormous dependence. There are always opportunities, you just need to see opportunities. Go for simple, that has a future.
Ruud Hendriks 13 September 2022
"The Netherlands has naturally fertile soils".?? Sandy soil, half of NL, is 10.000 years old. The higher parts have been washed out and are therefore naturally poor. In addition, there is indeed the man-made impoverishment. The 'human nature' requires maintenance. Maintenance is an emergency measure for the naturally poor soil.
"Grassland is a top performer in capturing CO2, more than forests". Here Jaap compares different forms of recording. Forest is structural, long-lasting, especially if you use wood as a building material afterwards. Grass is temporary, after a year all back in the atmosphere. Only organic matter build-up is structural agricultural contribution
Halving livestock is doubling food price. Somewhat exaggerated. Reducing livestock costs the farmer income. So you need a higher product price for the farmer if you want to absorb that. The consumer pays only a small part to the farmer, a lot for trade and processing. He notices much less of the higher price. By the way, 60% of the milk in the supermarket comes from abroad.......
The final paragraph is absolutely top notch. Stimulating CO2 storage in the soil is good for soil quality. Paying the farmer for services? Do it, immediately! Not only compensate for lost income, but also pay for every hour spent and for the mechanization deployed. €60 per hour OK?
Subscriber
time bomb 13 September 2022
ruud hendriks wrote:
"The Netherlands has naturally fertile soils".?? Sandy soil, half of NL, is 10.000 years old. The higher parts have been washed out and are therefore naturally poor. In addition, there is indeed the man-made impoverishment. The 'human nature' requires maintenance. Maintenance is an emergency measure for the naturally poor soil.
"Grassland is a top performer in capturing CO2, more than forests". Here Jaap compares different forms of recording. Forest is structural, long-lasting, especially if you use wood as a building material afterwards. Grass is temporary, after a year all back in the atmosphere. Only organic matter build-up is structural agricultural contribution
Halving livestock is doubling food price. Somewhat exaggerated. Reducing livestock costs the farmer income. So you need a higher product price for the farmer if you want to absorb that. The consumer pays only a small part to the farmer, a lot for trade and processing. He notices much less of the higher price. By the way, 60% of the milk in the supermarket comes from abroad.......
The final paragraph is absolutely top notch. Stimulating CO2 storage in the soil is good for soil quality. Paying the farmer for services? Do it, immediately! Not only compensate for lost income, but also pay for every hour spent and for the mechanization deployed. €60 per hour OK?
Dear Ruud.
Submit this immediately to The Hague. We must be paid for our services. Everything should just happen by itself, but we shouldn't do that anymore. Pay for sowing field margins, pay fee for geese management, and so on,
Denying VVD member 13 September 2022
I think that the hague has outsourced this problem to the services of D66.

and then apologize for our slavery past
Subscriber
peter 13 September 2022
ruud hendriks wrote:
"The Netherlands has naturally fertile soils".?? Sandy soil, half of NL, is 10.000 years old. The higher parts have been washed out and are therefore naturally poor. In addition, there is indeed the man-made impoverishment. The 'human nature' requires maintenance. Maintenance is an emergency measure for the naturally poor soil.
"Grassland is a top performer in capturing CO2, more than forests". Here Jaap compares different forms of recording. Forest is structural, long-lasting, especially if you use wood as a building material afterwards. Grass is temporary, after a year all back in the atmosphere. Only organic matter build-up is structural agricultural contribution
Halving livestock is doubling food price. Somewhat exaggerated. Reducing livestock costs the farmer income. So you need a higher product price for the farmer if you want to absorb that. The consumer pays only a small part to the farmer, a lot for trade and processing. He notices much less of the higher price. By the way, 60% of the milk in the supermarket comes from abroad.......
The final paragraph is absolutely top notch. Stimulating CO2 storage in the soil is good for soil quality. Paying the farmer for services? Do it, immediately! Not only compensate for lost income, but also pay for every hour spent and for the mechanization deployed. €60 per hour OK?
Ruud, how do you see that CO2 from grass is back in the air after a year?
And 60% of the milk in the supermarket comes from abroad, put that to our greens!
And I don't do it for € 60 per hour, a slightly trained information officer asks double, a contractor can deliver a ground dumper with tractor for that amount, excluding gas oil and a driver of 16.5 yrs. and then try everything 1800 hours/year to drive.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

BBTV Lubbert van Dellen

All about renure, nitrogen and new termination scheme

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up