Shutterstock

Opinions Edin Mujagic

Eurozone has panacea for the euro

11 January 2019 - Edin Mujagic - 7 comments

The diagnosis is: excessive debt. I am talking about the core problem of the eurozone. What causes tensions from time to time (when the economy is weakening or when things are going well and interest rates are rising) is the fact that many euro area countries are over-indebted.

In addition, it is often the same countries that do not have their budgets in order and therefore throw even more debts on an already too high mountain. Italy is perhaps the most famous and most recent example, but don't forget France.

The means that the currency union is currently using to solve these problems is to keep interest rates low. However, that is not a solution to the problem, but at most a remedy that can temporarily camouflage the pain.

Higher inflation
What I mainly fear is that the currency union (as a more structural solution) will opt for higher inflation. This is because inflation eats away part of the debt. The reason I fear this is because it is inevitable that large sections of the population will pay a price for it; for example through the erosion of the value of their income, savings and pensions, but also through a higher interest rate on the loans they take out.

It would then come as no surprise that dissatisfaction with politics and populism would increase further. This is also proven by history. The sad thing is that the eurozone has a means to solve the problem, without all those nasty side effects. However, she refuses to do so.

Dismantle the Debt Bomb
The best way to dismantle the 'ticking debt bomb' under the euro is to reduce debt through higher economic growth; if gross domestic product increases faster than debt, national debt falls. So what we need is, on the one hand, more budget discipline (so that the numerator does not get much higher) and, on the other hand, higher economic growth (so that the denominator gets much higher).

Usually there is no miracle cure that stimulates growth strongly, long-term and quickly. However, increased public investment can ensure strong and rapid growth, but not in the long term. Investments in education and research are driving growth strongly and for a long time, but not quickly. Except in the euro zone! 

The monetary union already has such a resource: the internal market for services. Although in practice it is not yet real. With this market, economic growth can be boosted by 5% to almost 9%, experts estimate. Suppose half of that is real, then growth rates of 4% and above would still be quite normal.

Budget discipline
For governments this would mean considerably more income from taxes and less expenditure (fewer unemployed, fewer benefits). Then you can count on that mountain of debt melting like snow in the sun, provided (and that is crucial) the European Commission (EC) does not allow the euro countries to squander that financial advantage.

So budget discipline (whichever way you look at it) is the key to success. Anyone who argues that the EC is doing something wrong when it takes action against countries that are (too) deep in the red (because enforcing fiscal discipline is the danger), is wrong in my view. Without that discipline, the coin, which is celebrating its twentieth anniversary this year, will not make it to its thirtieth anniversary, I fear.

Edin Mujagic

Edin Mujagić is an economist and manager at Beleggingsfonds Hoofbosch. He focuses on global central banks, and in his blogs he writes mainly about developments in interest rates and inflation. He has also written several books.
Comments
7 comments
hans 11 January 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10881019/eurozone-has-wondermiddel-voor-de-euro]Eurozone has a miracle cure for the euro[/url]
"However, more government investment can ensure strong and rapid growth"
of
"Free movement of services"

So, or
even more debt from public investment, or
the internal market for services, where every EU citizen can work wherever he or she wants, is the core of the free movement of services in force throughout the European Union.

Both are suicides for Western countries in the EU.

There are some solutions, but they do not give the citizen who pays, but the multinationals, the winners up to now.

Our lobbying policy and our controlled media will not count these solutions among the choices.
Ton Westgeest 12 January 2019
Hans there were indeed solutions, but I don't see them anymore because not only the media but also all politicians allow themselves to be guided. With controlled and manipulated figures, just look at WUR, WODC and PBL.
Nowhere is there a vision for the long term. They all just do what! And if it will cost voters....... just look at Dijkhof with the climate agreement! That's not going to happen (before the election!!!!)
And I am also convinced that those debts will cost us our heads.
Johan 12 January 2019
As a Belgian, I have always admired the Dutch because our northern neighbors have always shown a lot of discipline to limit their debts. Our successive governments, on the other hand, have allowed debts to skyrocket in Belgium. I keep wondering, what will be the ultimate long-term consequences of zero interest rates, perhaps decades lasting. Making debts for which you don't have to pay anything at all and pay the saver almost nothing. How long will countries such as the Netherlands and Germany continue to tolerate that countries such as Italy, France, Belgium, etc. sink into their debts and some apparently do not care at all about the limits set by Europe in this regard?
Ton Westgeest 12 January 2019
Don't admire too much Johan,
we naturally have many advantages. The location, the climate, the ports, the land, the knowledge, the people who want to work hard, the minerals, etc.
They want Dutch people all over the world. And yet we manage to still have a high national debt.
By stupid arrogant politicians, who think they don't need the hard working people. That the agricultural sector is not necessary at all, we can get it cheaper from abroad. We squandered the gas for little. We bring poison here and mix it in the fuel oil for shipping. They create new nature, which is not nature at all. Waste companies that pollute can just do their thing, but they want to tackle a cow fart. We let the mafia launder money with energy generation. We spend 100 billion taxpayers' money in 15 years on windmills, they are corrupt here, they use false numbers and work with assumptions, which they use to push everything into politics. Whether it's Schiphol, the agricultural sector or the environment. They measure here with different sizes otherwise it won't be right. With the army they want to join the big boys, Afghanistan, Mali, Syria and Iraq. They just gave the tanks away to Germany and now they are going to buy new ones...
Do you still admire us like that? We have to get rid of gas, we're going to buy that in Russia now! We all have to get into a Tesla, because they don't want petrol and diesel anymore! and pay, pay... because the purchasing power is rising, Supposedly!!! We have already cleaned up the manufacturing industry!!
A completely different time is coming for your northern neighbors too!
shoemakers1 13 January 2019
Ton Westgeest is considered crazy, but he is right
Ton Westgeest 14 January 2019
I'd rather they explain that than the doctor!
But, mark my words, pay attention I'm not far off!
loom 14 January 2019
I think a lot of people, especially the smaller entrepreneurs, agree with you. The rest are busy with their "job/career" and have been told during their training that he has no influence on that and it makes no sense to say or find anything about it.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

BBTV Edin Mujagic

'Next rate cut fast approaching'

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up