Frans Blok / Shutterstock.com

Opinions Ghost Rotgers

Investico choices determine the outcome of nitrogen calculations

25 November 2020 - Geesje Rotgers - 9 comments

'Handful of farms keep the Netherlands locked up'. That is the outcome of the investigation by Investico, a platform for investigative journalism based on calculations with the Aerius Calculator. However, the outcomes of Aerius Calculator depend on what you put into it.

This is typically one of those studies in which the choices you make determine the results of your research. Investico chooses to remediate farms. And then looks at how many farmers have to clear the field to make other projects possible. The journalists could of course also have chosen to remediate a biomass incinerator. In that case, removing one power station would have been enough to supply the whole of the building industry in the Netherlands with nitrogen. Why did Investico not calculate this option?

Arrows targeting farms
Because Investico focuses on the farms, it looks at the nature reserves in the eastern half of the Netherlands and the agricultural countryside. A number of nature reserves in the agricultural countryside have been selected for calculation. There are relatively many farmers in this half of the Netherlands and relatively little is built.

Investico could of course also have chosen to calculate industrial nitrogen sources around nature reserves in the western half of the Netherlands. Relatively much is being built here and there are relatively few farmers. The results of the investigation would have turned out differently. This choice would also have been logical, since most construction nitrogen is needed in the west of the Netherlands.

Nitrogen emissions from Shell across the Netherlands
Investico takes the example of the turkey farmer in the Veluwe, with 'extremely high emissions close to a nature reserve.' According to Investico, that emission is 201.119 moles of nitrogen per year. Is this extremely high? It just depends on what you compare it to. If we look at Shell, for example, a bit further away in Rotterdam, we see that this company annually emits 1,75 mol per hectare in the Veluwe. Much more than the turkey farmer.

The turkey farmer in Ermelo produces an average of 0,799 moles of nitrogen per hectare in the Veluwe each year. This is because this farmer is very close to the area. At this farmer, however, the deposition is limited to 1 nature reserve. It is different in the energy industry. Shell does not only emit the relatively large amount of nitrogen in the Veluwe, but in all nature reserves throughout the Netherlands.  

Investico is, of course, free to choose to remediate farms in rural areas in order to speed up construction projects in urban areas. And present the results unilaterally. That is a more political choice than a journalistic one.

Ghost Rotgers

Investigative journalist in the agricultural sector
Comments
9 comments
Subscriber
Trevor 25 November 2020
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10890170/choices-investico-bepalen-uitkomst-stikstofcalculaties]Keuzes Investico determine outcome nitrogen calculations[/url]
Framing again obvious. Think about timing for a while, this kind of mood-making never comes alone. Will there soon be a decision to make about nitrogen in The Hague?
Subscriber
mt 25 November 2020

I get the feeling more and more whether I still want this... continuously put in the corner, overflowing with framing.

We should all just stop supplying products. Because for years this atmosphere is not good for anyone. On top of the revenue model, which is not there.

In short, tired of all the bullshit, and work for nothing
Ruud Hendriks 25 November 2020
Viewed from an internal perspective, the study is interesting. Despite the improvement gene, livestock farming as a whole still emits too much. That is now being reversed across the sector. Remediation of peak loaders gives relatively many companies that are already active in reduction more space and time for their progress.

As for political or journalistic choice? Putting shell and a turkey farmer side by side in a comparison? It looks creamy on paper, but apples and pears are even more alike. This is also a political text, but of a different political colour.
Subscriber
smart ass 25 November 2020
2 pages in Trouw

get a nice platform again

do we know where our friends are?
Subscriber
Skirt 25 November 2020
The farmer is synonymous with: polluter, criminal, stupid, stinky, rich, hard-working, sober, closed, etc.
In short, it is very versatile and suitable for everyone to pull their weight or to solve major problems by disappearing themselves. What would NL do without the farmers? Who then becomes the all-rounder, head of jut and polluter?
They will still long for 'the farmer' when he is gone.
Subscriber
not 25 November 2020
You can also just stop building extra houses
problem solved!
Subscriber
quite rude 26 November 2020
Thank you Geesje for your clear explanation!!
That is how it goes with results and examinations paid for by the government. When will we unite to arrange and fund such investigations ourselves so that we can wash their ears against their one-sided results? It is clear that so many studies are aimed at shrinking the agricultural sector (read land grab) in order to create space to accommodate importers, build industry, roads, and nature.
we have always been the drain.
Crackling people who say that agriculture is polluted should take a good look in the mirror and pay attention to how polluting they themselves are in the form of luxury consumption in the broadest sense of the word. Once where the screamers live, nature or agriculture was once sacrificed for their living and living pleasure and we also ensure that the shops where they come are overflowing with wonderfully beautiful and healthy products from Dutch soil!! something to be proud of I think.
Geesje, persevere in the fight and put it on, we desperately need people like you!!
Subscriber
peta 26 November 2020
pretty rude wrote:
Thank you Geesje for your clear explanation!!
That is how it goes with results and examinations paid for by the government. When will we unite to arrange and fund such investigations ourselves so that we can wash their ears against their one-sided results? It is clear that so many studies are aimed at shrinking the agricultural sector (read land grab) in order to create space to accommodate importers, build industry, roads, and nature.
we have always been the drain.
Crackling people who say that agriculture is polluted should take a good look in the mirror and pay attention to how polluting they themselves are in the form of luxury consumption in the broadest sense of the word. Once where the screamers live, nature or agriculture was once sacrificed for their living and living pleasure and we also ensure that the shops where they come are overflowing with wonderfully beautiful and healthy products from Dutch soil!! something to be proud of I think.
Geesje, persevere in the fight and put it on, we desperately need people like you!!
@pretty rude; strongly agree
Subscriber
Narcos 26 November 2020
wrote:
Amen.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

BBTV Lubbert van Dellen

All about renure, nitrogen and new termination scheme

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up