Nature is supplied with nitrogen from the air (from agriculture, industry, logistics). The size of this resource is calculated to the gram, every year. But nature also receives nitrogen from its own soil stock. This is still the largest source of nitrogen, which is not quantified and taken into account in nitrogen policy
Disruption of the natural soil, such as water abstraction and deforestation, drives the release of nitrogen from the soil stock. The size of this substantial nitrogen source is not shown, but rather is left out of the picture. This is remarkable, since this nitrogen affects nitrogen-sensitive nature just as much.
Farmers Defense Force was able to publicize a large number of measurements in nature reserves in Drenthe in April, via a WOB procedure. These measurements show that the largest nitrogen source is not nitrogen deposition, but the supply of nitrogen from the own soil stock.
Nature itself accumulates a lot of nitrogen
Where does the nitrogen that fertilizes and acidifies nature come from? Nature itself accumulates a lot of nitrogen. The total nitrogen deposition in the past 100 years amounts to 2.400 kilos per hectare. Measurements in 286 natural soils in the Province of Drenthe show that thousands of kilos of nitrogen are stored in the top 10 cm of the soil alone: 3.000 kilos per hectare (dry forest, dry heath), 4.000 kilo/ha (humid forest, moist heath ) to 10.000 kilo/ha (raised bogs, swamps). The layer below contains much more nitrogen, according to literature. So much more than has precipitated in 100 years.
From literature of the previous generation of nitrogen researchers it turns out that nature binds a lot of nitrogen (N2) from the air. In nitrogen-poor soil, this can be as much as 60 to 80 kilos per hectare per year. Soil organisms do this. As long as this nitrogen is stored, there is nothing to worry about. That will be different when it is released. This happens in the event of soil disturbance, usually the result of policy choices made by the government and/or nature manager.
When is the nitrogen released from the soil stock?
In principle, the soil stock of nitrogen is safely stored, fixed in organic matter. And it is almost not available to plants and can therefore do no harm to nitrogen-sensitive nature. This nitrogen is released through disturbances in the soil (in the past and present). The organic matter is then broken down more quickly. In the province of Drenthe, the annual amounts of nitrogen are estimated to be 30 to 250 kilos per hectare, which are released from the soil stock.
This is (much) more nitrogen than is supplied from emissions from agriculture, industry and logistics (together 22,5 kilos per hectare annually). Activities that boost nitrogen release on a long-term or even permanent basis include changing water management, water extraction or abstraction, felling forests or transforming nature.
Nitrogen source out of view
The government therefore keeps this largest source of nitrogen out of the picture. The largest nitrogen source is not quantified and not taken into account in nitrogen policy, while the size of this source is relatively easy to measure and monitor. The aim of nature policy is a good conservation status. When looking at the influence of nitrogen, all nitrogen sources that have an influence must be included. It is not right to keep a substantial nitrogen source out of the picture.
The billion-dollar package of measures to reduce depositions from agriculture, industry and logistics can never lead to a measurable result if profits are canceled out by larger losses. The nitrogen gain from the 100-kilometre measure for traffic amounts to approximately 0,3 kilos per hectare annually. This gain is negated by the loss of nitrogen from the soil stock of 30 to 250 kilos per hectare per year.
Degradation of soil stock
Policy-supporting institutes, NGOs and nature organizations are in an extraordinary hurry with measures that yield 0,3 to 5 kilos of nitrogen gain and are screaming bloody murder about this. But they are silent about the much larger nitrogen source: the degradation of the soil stock. The difference in attention correlates with the available budget.
Transparency in the nitrogen dossier is hard to find. My experience is that a lot of data is withheld. The Province of Drenthe had also not made public the measurements in 286 natural soils, which visualized the supply of nitrogen from the soil itself. A WOB procedure had to be used to make the data available.
© DCA Market Intelligence. This market information is subject to copyright. It is not permitted to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or make the content available to third parties for compensation, in any form, without the express written permission of DCA Market Intelligence.
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10892724/overheid-weegt-largest-stikstofbron- niet-mee]Government does not consider largest nitrogen source[/url]
it is not an excess of people that is the cause but an overconsumption of everything from travel to mobile phone to driving a car to the computer
how long do people measure the temperature 200 years before that one can only guess how hot it was
they can only measure the co2 content and thus guess the temperature
It is very remarkable that there are many relatives to the report that can be found in the STAF research can be found on Google. And that we as agriculture are severely disadvantaged and nature gets all the attention, I think we now have much less air pollution than before the corona since agriculture, food supply, has not changed, no less transport, harvesting activities, fertilizing and harvesting. So the polluter is the citizen with his holy cow and aviation polluting the atmosphere with millions of liters of kerosene.
It is also suggested by some that only CO2 is captured by nature, it is always avoided that agriculture captures many times more CO2, eg beets and maize lay gem. 44000 kg/ha while nature avg. does not capture more than 6000 kg/ha, how can you get even more land from agriculture, no, we do get the soy from another continent and make a hamburger out of it, do we know what that costs in CO2.
There is also no country in the world that is so mad about nitrogen and CO2, if it continues like this, we will destroy a very well-functioning economy for a bunch of idealists who are inciting the whole of the Netherlands, in my opinion that goes way too far and we have to put a stop to this.
The key question is: is nitrogen released from the digestion of the natural soil? For low-lying natural soils (peat and stream valleys): yes. Minerals in the sandy area wash from high to low, ending in the stream valleys. There used to be arid grasslands there. The soil itself is then rich, but the digestion is slow, so that only limited growth is possible. The plants that grow from it accumulate as peat or organic matter in stream valley soil. This is accelerated by lowering the water level. Please note: this reduction is at the wish of the agricultural sector. So nature enriches from within, but through the actions of people from outside, not through nature itself. High sandy soils are naturally poor, lowering the groundwater level has little effect there, it is far away anyway. Extra degradation is not an issue there, especially not because those soils have become acidic due to acid rain in previous decades (ammonia from livestock farming and sulfuric acid from fossil combustion). Not conducive to the soil organisms that have to do the decomposition.
So there is something to the story that nitrogen can also come from natural soil itself, especially the wet ones. But I wouldn't shout that too loudly because an important cause of that release is agriculture. With a bit of bad luck, the article by Geesje Rotgers will put the consequences of ammonia emission into perspective in the wet area (not in the dry area), but it will exaggerate another problem.