Shutterstock

Opinions Herre Bartlema

No worries about a fertilizer tax

12 November 2018 - Herre Bartlema - 13 comments

The adopted motion on a so-called 'fertilizer tax' in the House of Representatives is dismayed by many people in the agricultural sector. Precision fertilization specialist Herre Bartlema sees it differently. "Using less nitrogen fertilizer is not a cause for concern."

Last week the House of Representatives passed a motion passed calling on the government to introduce a tax on nitrogen fertilizers to consider† In doing so, the House aims to reduce the consumption of nitrogen fertilizer. People apparently do not trust the fine words of the sector about the agricultural vision of Minister Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality). A memorandum in which the minister makes a clear statement about the use of fertilizer.

Fear is unfounded
The negative reactions to the motion show that the House is not entirely wrong; as well as from LTO Netherlands. Through the chairman of the Arable Farming Department: Jaap van Wenum. There is a fear (without having access to fast-acting nitrogen from fertilizers) that there will be a significant loss of production in the crops. That fear is unjustified, because there are enough fast-acting nitrogen fertilizers available that come from the circular economy, as the minister wishes.

It is a fact that the production and conventional application of nitrogen fertilizers have a serious environmental impact. Whether it concerns the climate, nitrate leaching and run-off, ammonia emissions, biodiversity, soil life or nature inclusivity.

Alternatives available
That is why in 2008 in the Clean and Economical Agreement agreed (Article 7.5) that the government and the business community invest in research into alternative fertilizers and application methods. Both parties invested a lot of money in this from 2010 to 2015, but now we are benefiting a lot from it.

There is a wide range of permitted fast-acting nitrogen fertilizers, which can easily replace fertilizer nitrogen. Anasol and sulfuric acid ammonia solution are well-known examples. Under the leadership of (Z)LTO in the Precision Agriculture Programme, the sector has prepared for the current situation. Just so you know. Precision fertilization with circular fertilizers delivers top yields at lower costs without environmental impact. A win-win situation. With green more money!

Herre Bartlema

Herre Bartlema is chairman of the NCOK: Netherlands Center for the Development of Circular Precision Agriculture. The aim: to promote the application of practical precision farming techniques to contribute to a clean sector.
Comments
13 comments
Johan 12 November 2018
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10880483/geen-zorgen-om-een-heffing-op-kunstmest]Don't worry about a levy on fertilizer[/url]
This man has been preaching only for his own parish for years. It is incomprehensible that he, with his background, still gets a stage every time.
herre bartlema 12 November 2018
Hi Johan, what exactly do you mean by own parish? Until now, I mainly earned my income by testing fertilizer spreaders and producing and supplying simple measuring instruments for determining fertilizer quality by growers themselves. Activities in the service of the primary sector that will come to an end.
Farmer.. 12 November 2018
Couldn't you keep that nonsense of yours to yourself, Herre.

The sector itself is smart enough to choose a good fertilizer.

That discharge water that you promote might be nice on grassland to further impoverish your soil.

It's not that difficult to investigate the oh.

Mvg a concerned arable farmer, who doesn't want to let the future depend on a researcher
herre bartlema 12 November 2018
Good evening concerned farmer! Your future depends on a strong market position and a " license to produce " . My company aims to contribute to this. We use the results of independent scientific research. A lot of (farmer's) money has been invested in this within the framework of the Precision Agriculture Programme. It is true that you have to use drainage eye with knowledge, that applies to all new fertilizers, that is why we make an effort to organize good independent information with the POP 3 (farmers) funds that have been reserved for this. Feel free to call me colleague entrepreneur, if you want to know more: 0651596092.
hans 13 November 2018
Lord "call me",
why don't you just explain things here to people who "don't get it"?

After all, your knowledge is acquired through research and paid for by our farmers' money.
??? !!! 13 November 2018
HB is nagging by profession.
What is the approach: ignore or shout over?!
Subscriber
common farmer 13 November 2018
Sir, your story is factually incorrect. The more often you apply the fertilizer spreader or spray the land, the better against leaching. Fertilizer urean combined with a greenhouse is ultimately the most sustainable for all nitrogen emissions. Provided sufficient OS is present.

Your fast-acting fertilizers are worse for soil life, higher emissions due to limited application options, and I don't understand that run-off. Bad story.

You know that the ORGANIC sector leaves the biggest nitrogen gap??
Arnold van Woerkom 13 November 2018
If we look at fertilization in relation to environmental impact, shouldn't we aim for sufficient organically bound minerals in the soil? The plant roots activate the soil life to make those minerals available when they are needed. Optimal recording and minimal losses. Ensuring that the minerals remain in stock but offering them in the right form is never a problem. How do we convince the politicians of this fundamental knowledge, which is no longer visible at current knowledge institutions?
herre bartlema 14 November 2018
Dear GB,

What we - the Network Smart Fertilization - advocate is this: carry out the basic fertilization as much as possible with organic fertilizer and then adjust with fast-acting nitrogen, so that you can be sure that it is absorbed shortly after the moment of application. That is rational fertilization and that is now also possible with fast-acting circular nitrogen fertilizers.
They provide minimal environmental impact and at least the same high yields, if applied at the right time, in the right dosage and in the right place (= in the root zone).
gash 14 November 2018
Nice and handy to do the basic fertilization in winter wheat and barley.

Maybe you're going to invent a Tow Snake to a Helicopter from grant funds.

But in April, manure comes on too late because it is usually too wet.

Don't see how you want to drive the manure in February, and then the N will also have to be available just as quickly as with Kas or NTS
Subscriber
Rob 14 November 2018
It's the world upside down.
Pig farming has grown exponentially over the past 50 years. This with the help of politics and in particular with the help of "the hole of Rotterdam". South America is being looted to be able to fatten pigs here, which then have to travel all over the world to get rid of them. The stench from the stables is made somewhat bearable again with the help of a scrubber and the discharge water that comes out is in fact chemical waste.
And now arable farming is allowed to greenwash this chemical waste. And we have to pay for that ourselves. The fertilizer will become more expensive and if we all switch to circular fertilizers, they will also become more expensive. The government is happy, free money. The shit producers are happy, their chemical waste is suddenly a green fertilizer and they get money for it too.

My vision for my company. Maximum organic manure, compost and green manures throughout the entire construction plan. Start doses in all crops with NTS/Urean (make sure to work in) and adjust with fertilizer. Because Herre has a point, nothing works more precisely than liquid fertilizer.
herre bartlema 15 November 2018
Well spoken Rob. Note: Urean and NTS are also fertilizers. Our message is that equivalent replacements are available for this, originating from the circular economy.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Analysis Fertilizer

Import duty drives up price of Russian fertilizer

Analysis Fertilizer

Fertilizer: hardly any demand, price drop in the offing?

Analysis Fertilizer

Higher gas price further boosts fertilizer market

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register