Shutterstock

Opinions Herre Bartlema

The best farming wishes for 2019

2 January 2019 - Herre Bartlema - 9 comments

The various messages for the new year from The Hague and Wageningen to the agricultural sector contain relatively few surprises.

Both Minister Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality) as Louise Fresh consistently repeat the 'tale of the two cities'. This can be read since September in the ministerial memorandum 'The Netherlands leads the way in circular agriculture: transition to circular agriculture is necessary, urgent and requires innovations and cooperation'.

Broad support
It has become apparent that there is broad support, as the responses to the memorandum show. It means 2019 could be a good year for policymakers. The support for this memorandum is not entirely unexpected, because circular agriculture can (just like many environmental measures) lead to a cost reduction for the agricultural company.

This is also apparent from the business comparisons made in the context of the Vruchtbare Kringloop Achterhoek (VKA) project. That knowledge is now useful and that is why, on the basis of those studies, a brochure drawn up. It contains clear graphs and texts for those interested in the theory.

Package of measures
However, practice will benefit most from the measurements for daily practice. This concerns, for example, measures for cultivation (such as sowing clover) and fertilization measures (such as diluting slurry and the use of spring fertilizers).

VKA provides a good example with this. So now let's continue to clearly formulate best agricultural practices for circular agriculture. There is a need for that now: don't talk, but brush in 2019.

Herre Bartlema

Herre Bartlema is chairman of the NCOK: Netherlands Center for the Development of Circular Precision Agriculture. The aim: to promote the application of practical precision farming techniques to contribute to a clean sector.
Comments
9 comments
Subscriber
Arnold van Woerkom 2 January 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10880927/de-beste-landbouwwensen-voor-2019]The best agricultural wishes for 2019[/url]
Sir, I don't quite agree with you. The ministerial note is good, but then the policy measures, which I feared, are not sufficient to achieve the desired result.

Will explain to you why.
The path we have taken to get to where we are now in food production is one of product maximization based on chemical thinking, economic thinking and now also technical thinking. And we have lost the knowledge of the natural laws. Consciously, but not about that right now. The law and regulations are still based on the same principles. And I notice that the knowledge institutions and education are also chained in that philosophy.

Where are the solutions?
Embracing the ecological philosophy, not chemically dominating nature but facilitating with natural additives will bring the solution. All initiatives, yes all of them and make sure that I follow them in terms of content, are still based on old thinking and will not structurally bring the solution. If you are not able to remove the cause of the problems, you will not find the solution. Suppose, therefore, that those who caused the problems and helped them are unable to solve them for several reasons. A lack (consciously or unconsciously) of fundamental knowledge.

Herre understand that you don't like it, business, but better half turned than completely erred. Would like to hear your view on this view.

hans 2 January 2019
Arnold, in our Western elite world, only, only economically, money, money, money and power are thought of.

Farmers were and are taught that chemical and technical improvement provides a better economic model for them.
It only produces dependence and guilt.
The economic profit goes TRIPLE to the elites, selling more products to farmers and buying more farmer production cheaper and selling more expensive.

Farmer's products are of lower quality by only selecting on productive capacity and by GMO tinkering, are then often cracked by the industry, so that the original food quality disappears completely.
However, this often produces doubled amounts of "food", also promoted as "innovative", so even more expensive.

Checkout, checkout, checkout, between farmer and consumer.

By the way, Herre's

"The transition to circular agriculture is necessary, urgent and requires innovations and cooperation. It has become apparent that broad support can be counted on, as the responses to the memorandum show."

is worth as much as the nonsensical transition to sustainable energy.

The sectors that pollute the environment with CO2 do nothing, do not have to, only the citizen is obliged (contradiction in terminis) to switch and adapt, again leading to enormous cash flow for the above group with only 2 wishes:
money and power.

liekele 2 January 2019
Let me first enjoy the beautiful Valtra (power) from BEMU from Marknesse.
Harry 2 January 2019
What is the link Liekele?
??? !!! 2 January 2019
that's obvious: Boerenbusiness has given HB the floor again.... stupid.
jpk 3 January 2019
If we cannot regulate the sale of products better, we will be sentenced to the minimum wage. For example, the 2017 grower price was 0.50€ 2018 grower price 0.25€ for pears
herre bartlema 3 January 2019
Thanks for all the responses, the subject is alive and has many aspects, but I like to stay specific. Powerfully promoting best agricultural practices for circular agriculture, what do you think? Feel free to come to Westmaas on January 15 or to Nijkerk on 7 to find out about it. See the homepage of www.smartfertilization.nl
peter 3 January 2019
too bad that comments are removed by bb if you hit the nail on the head. we as agro are ready for the next 30 years when it comes to co2 emissions and leaching. the water quality has never been as good as in recent years, only people don't show it off because they try to trick us with everything. the only problem is that everyone wants to eat from the farmer's hay rack, also DHR Bartelema and that this has to be ready once the rack has been empty for years. Go improve the world in shipping and aviation there are 95% of the problems and the solution, but no, the easiest way is bullying the farmer where the cake is just finished and everything is in order, which no 1 other country can say if only the Netherlands are looking for something out of the corner again...
hans 3 January 2019
Peter, shipping and aviation multinationals do lobby and write the policy documents for the stupid politicians. Easier then, to deposit "the problem" on someone else's plate.
And indeed, the vultures from the agricultural sector do come up with solutions for "our problems".
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register