Greenpeace Belgium has launched an attack on the Belgian potato processing industry. With the report 'Record profits for the industry, peanuts for the farmers' the environmental organization makes clear how it views the potato sector. From the agricultural sector, the environmental movement is not immediately seen as a natural ally and there is also a lot to criticize about the report. Yet, at its core, a very valid point is made: the farmer does not get the most out of his potential.
Seven players (Clarebout Potatoes, Agristo, Lutosa (part of McCain), Mydibel (now taken over by Clarebout), Ecofrost, Farm Frites Belgium, and Aviko Belgium) together control approximately 90% of the Belgian potato market according to Greenpeace. There is something to note about the key figures about the processors in the summary of the report. A comparison is made between 2021 and 2022. It seems like a while ago, but in 2021 we still had to deal with corona measures. Don't get me wrong, the processors have been able to present impressive figures in recent years, but it seems that the cherry is being picked out of the pie.
What the environmental organization also conveniently ignores is that grower prices for potatoes have also risen considerably in recent years. The contracts have increased by tens of percent in the last two years. Records are being set for free potatoes for the second year in a row. Of course, costs have also risen very rapidly for growers. Especially for growers who did not dig up everything last season and are now having difficulty getting all the seed potatoes into the ground, all that glitters is not gold. In general, there does not seem to be the greatest dissatisfaction among chip growers about how the potato market is currently functioning. Compare this to wheat, whose sales price has fallen much faster in a good year than the cost price has fallen or onions, which is a bit of a lottery.
Belgapom under fire
Where I think Greenpeace has hit the nail on the head is that processors have a very big say in determining the potato price. 70% to 75% of turnover is through contracts. In Belgium, this is mainly done with tonnage contracts instead of hectare contracts as is usual in the Netherlands. If the grower cannot deliver the contractually agreed quantity, he will have to pay the difference between the contract price and the price on the open market. The price on the open market is largely determined by the Belgapom quotation. Growers have no voice in the listing committee. Three members from the trade and three from processing form the committee. Trade and processing ultimately determine which prices are included and which are excluded. It is not surprising that Belgapom reacts as if bitten by a viper to the report at Vilt.
From that point of view, strengthening the negotiating position of the farmer in the potato chain is not at all a crazy suggestion from Greenpeace. The idea of proper controls and sanctions on unfair (trade) practices will also appeal to farmers. One of Greenpeace's solutions is uniting farmers. However, in the past this has proven to be very difficult. Initiatives in that area have rarely been successful. Greenpeace calls on the government and cooperatives to take a leading role. This can help in contract negotiations. However, these agreements are mainly concluded directly between grower and processor. A trade organization or growers' association seems to be a better party for this.
Strengthening cooperatives alone will not solve the underlying problem in the free market. As 'mediators' in the free market, traditional potato cooperatives face the same problem as growers. If the potatoes are not there, almost anything can be obtained from the processors at almost any price. If it seems for a moment that there are enough potatoes, buyers slam on the brakes. Just think back to what happened during harvest last fall.
Market protection
Another recommendation from Greenpeace to abolish the Belgapom listing and replace it 'with price mechanisms that reflect actual market conditions and production costs' sounds nice, but how do you put it into practice? The fact that prices for potatoes and agricultural products in general should never be below the cost price of sustainable production, as Greenpeace argues, sounds sympathetic, regardless of the question of what is meant by sustainable production. This season in particular, calling for the phasing out of 'pesticides and synthetic fertilizers' and placing organic cultivation on a pedestal does raise questions about how well the environmental organization has studied the technical aspects of cultivation. We have gained experience in Europe with the original common agricultural policy (CAP) with a system of market protection and guaranteed prices. That was not a success or perhaps too much of a success, depending on how you look at it. It is not without reason that the system was drastically reformed in the early 90s.
How to do this remains a difficult question. As farmers, we should scratch our heads that even an organization like Greenpeace is raising the alarm about the distribution of profits in the potato chain. Initiatives are being taken to make the growers' voices heard better through the Producers' Organization for Consumption Potatoes (POC) or attempts to get the futures market going again. However, it is difficult to get enough growers behind this. Apparently, after a few years of good prices, potato growers are fine with it.
© DCA Market Intelligence. This market information is subject to copyright. It is not permitted to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or make the content available to third parties for compensation, in any form, without the express written permission of DCA Market Intelligence.
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10909567/even-greenpeace-falls-over-prijs formation-potatoes]Even Greenpeace falls over potato price formation[/url]
By writing an article on this site about what Greenpeace thinks of the potato industry and the growers, you are giving this organization a platform, which I don't think they deserve at all. In Dutch, they have nothing to do with that. Not that I am claiming that Greenpeace has no right to exist and no function, but interfering with the trade and actions of manufacturers and suppliers, in my opinion, goes a few bridges too far.
ever heard of the saying that what helps best against high prices are high prices. This will sooner or later also happen with the fries potatoes. The cost price is high here and other countries will gradually be able to compete with Western Europe.
Then at least they won't be bothered by phytophthora. ;) that's already a much lower cost price.
juun wrote:That's right, if you don't have potatoes then you don't have phytophtora. Clever!Then at least they won't be bothered by phytophthora. ;) that's already a much lower cost price.
CM wrote:they are not stupid enough to put potatoes in places where there is no water. America Canada all under the pivot.juun wrote:That's right, if you don't have potatoes then you don't have phytophtora. Clever!Then at least they won't be bothered by phytophthora. ;) that's already a much lower cost price.
juun wrote:The water rights do not allow a significant expansion of cultivation there. Transport costs have increased explosively again, which means that all in all there will be little competition. Good wages can continue to be paid, especially because the area of free potatoes is only small for the factories.CM wrote:they are not stupid enough to put potatoes in places where there is no water. America Canada all under the pivot.juun wrote:That's right, if you don't have potatoes then you don't have phytophtora. Clever!Then at least they won't be bothered by phytophthora. ;) that's already a much lower cost price.
No, in China at least fresh water is already the limiting factor so I will help you out of that dream.
By the way, all this talk about high prices is strange. Kinnesinne or something? It is only a very small proportion of free growers who score higher prices. In recent months there has been a very limited supply of free potatoes at high prices because they were simply not available anymore. So exaggerating is also an art and jealousy plays quite a role here.
CM wrote:When I look at this week's VTA list, there was still quite a bit and most people thought they would become even more expensive. Processors are not crazy, they only say no to a few customers instead of buying fries potatoes that are expensive and may not turn at all. Turning left or right, those potatoes have to go through a knife at some point, so when the ceiling is reached, they just wait until they come back automatically. and it's not that you can't grow potatoes for 65 cents.By the way, all this talk about high prices is strange. Kinnesinne or something? It is only a very small proportion of free growers who score higher prices. In recent months there has been a very limited supply of free potatoes at high prices because they were simply not available anymore. So exaggerating is also an art and jealousy plays quite a role here.
CM wrote:they are not stupid enough to put potatoes in places where there is no water. America Canada all under the pivot.juun wrote:That's right, if you don't have potatoes then you don't have phytophtora. Clever!Then at least they won't be bothered by phytophthora. ;) that's already a much lower cost price.
juun wrote:And where there is no pivot, there are no potatoes.CM wrote:they are not stupid enough to put potatoes in places where there is no water. America Canada all under the pivot.juun wrote:That's right, if you don't have potatoes then you don't have phytophtora. Clever!Then at least they won't be bothered by phytophthora. ;) that's already a much lower cost price.
space wrote:That is correct, but there are also many places in America where there is a pivot on corn and soy. If that is an area, potatoes can also grow there. and corn has now slumped considerably after a number of golden years.juun wrote:And where there is no pivot, there are no potatoes.CM wrote:they are not stupid enough to put potatoes in places where there is no water. America Canada all under the pivot.juun wrote:That's right, if you don't have potatoes then you don't have phytophtora. Clever!Then at least they won't be bothered by phytophthora. ;) that's already a much lower cost price.
space wrote:That is correct, but there are also many places in America where there is a pivot on corn and soy. If that is an area, potatoes can also grow there. and corn has now slumped considerably after a number of golden years.juun wrote:And where there is no pivot, there are no potatoes.CM wrote:they are not stupid enough to put potatoes in places where there is no water. America Canada all under the pivot.juun wrote:That's right, if you don't have potatoes then you don't have phytophtora. Clever!Then at least they won't be bothered by phytophthora. ;) that's already a much lower cost price.
juun wrote:The climate is indeed a major issue, when it is 25 degrees below zero in winter it is not easy to transport potatoes over large distances, read thousands of km!space wrote:That is correct, but there are also many places in America where there is a pivot on corn and soy. If that is an area, potatoes can also grow there. and corn has now slumped considerably after a number of golden years.juun wrote:And where there is no pivot, there are no potatoes.CM wrote:they are not stupid enough to put potatoes in places where there is no water. America Canada all under the pivot.juun wrote:That's right, if you don't have potatoes then you don't have phytophtora. Clever!Then at least they won't be bothered by phytophthora. ;) that's already a much lower cost price.