Orange Pictures / Shutterstock.com

Opinions Kasper Walter

How our policymakers are faltering in energy transition

15 July 2024 - Kasper Walet - 3 comments

In recent years, the specific climate and energy knowledge of our politicians has been disappointing. As a result, a policy was announced one time only to be withdrawn just as easily later. Sophie Hermans, our new VVD climate minister, is also an example of this.

It was recently her turn to be 'grilled' by members of the House of Representatives during a hearing in which the new ministers of the Schoof cabinet were questioned. During the question period, the question was, among other things, how the VVD member views climate change. A rather remarkable response followed: she responded that the then prevailing warm summer week proved that climate change was taking place.

Still investing in new nuclear power plants
A comment in the same category as that of our previous climate minister Rob Jetten, who told Joost Eerdmans in parliament that he did not know how to heat a house with nuclear energy. And therefore did not see why we had to invest in nuclear energy. Only to decide, at the end of his reign, to invest in new nuclear power stations.

Let's go back to Minister Hermans' comment, where she confuses the concepts of climate and weather - as often happens. It is commonplace these days to blame every weather event, such as a flood or storm damage, on climate change. Those hot days? Climate change. That storm? Climate change. That flood? Climate change. But weather and climate are really two different things.

Always outliers up and down
Climate is the average weather over a longer period of time. As the climate changes, the average weather changes. There will always be outliers, up and down. The daily fluctuations in temperature, precipitation, air pressure and so on are what we call weather. So while they are closely related, weather and climate are not the same. Climate is what you expect. Weather is what really happens.

But why do politicians and policymakers keep saying that this or that disaster is caused by climate change? What they actually want to convey is a covert advertising message that encourages you to care about climate change and therefore support efforts to decarbonize the economy.

Experts certainly believe that global climate change will lead to more frequent extreme weather events, with disastrous consequences. Therefore, reducing CO2 emissions should certainly play an important role in tackling the problem of man-made climate change. Although such policies also come with enormous trade-offs that impact human well-being and progress. But this is not the only policy that can help humanity cope with damaging weather changes.

Technological innovations to limit risks
Economic growth and technological innovation have always enabled humans to adapt to extreme weather conditions. Kilmaat scientist Bjorn Lomborg has calculated that the chance of someone dying from climate-related risks such as floods, droughts, storms, forest fires and extreme temperatures has fallen by more than 1920% since 99. Scientific research is increasingly able to tell us how climate change affects the risk of extreme weather events. But unfortunately it cannot tell us how best to deal with this.

If only it were true, if we only look at the vacillating Dutch energy transition policy of the past 10 years. If our administrators had first thought carefully and calculated, they would have come to the conclusion that we should have invested in nuclear energy and grid expansion, they would not have closed coal-fired power stations, they would not have gradually replaced Groningen natural gas with North Sea gas, and they would have long since implemented a national insulation program. electric driving is not subsidized, and biomass and hydrogen are ignored.

That policy would certainly have reduced more CO2 and would not have put our prosperity and purchasing power at risk as it does now. We'll just have to wait and see what kind of wandering policy awaits us next. The first signs are not very positive.

Kasper Walter

Kasper Walet is a former board member of the agricultural futures market. He has now been working under the name Maycroft for years as an independent adviser on energy and climate to governments and companies from all over the world.
Comments
3 comments
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 15 July 2024
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10909647/hoe-onze-beleidsmakers-zwalken-in-energietransitie]How our policymakers are floundering in energy transition[/url]
Nice article Kasper Walet. But where is the knowledge of climate and energy that should provide politicians with the necessary knowledge through Dutch science, in collaboration with other countries? Understand that Bill Gates has a new concept for nuclear reactors, the first of which will start in Wisconsin around 2030 called 'Project Natrium', much cheaper to build and explore and much cleaner. I have informed the BBB about this. Understand that a traditional nuclear reactor requires 10 years of construction time along with $100 billion, so it might be a good thing that hasn't started yet. Nice to check. The biggest mistake that has been made is to label gas as harmful fossil fuels, even though in 2008 the US had already invested more than 100 billion dollars in the switch from diesel to gas for heavy transport. Now there seems to be a major program to use soya oil as a biofuel - probably added to diesel. Here in Brazil there is up to 26% ethanol in gasoline and the flex cars can have gasoline and pure ethanol in one tank. Major problems are solved there. Now E2G (second generation ethanol) is starting to be produced, especially for aviation fuel, which also reduces many problems. All this uses renewable fuels. Then there is the whole hydrogen story in all colours, but it seems that electric driving does have problems! Good luck with these vicissitudes, and don't forget if we have to do without sunlight for a week, the CO₂ will protect us, because that's what it was made for!!
Subscriber
It can freeze or thaw 20 July 2024
Louis Pascal de Geer wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10909647/hoe-onze-beleidsmakers-zwalken-in-energietransitie]How our policymakers are floundering in energy transition[/url]
Nice article Kasper Walet. But where is the knowledge of climate and energy that should provide politicians with the necessary knowledge through Dutch science, in collaboration with other countries? Understand that Bill Gates has a new concept for nuclear reactors, the first of which will start in Wisconsin around 2030 called 'Project Natrium', much cheaper to build and explore and much cleaner. I have informed the BBB about this. Understand that a traditional nuclear reactor requires 10 years of construction time along with $100 billion, so it might be a good thing that hasn't started yet. Nice to check. The biggest mistake that has been made is to label gas as harmful fossil fuels, even though in 2008 the US had already invested more than 100 billion dollars in the switch from diesel to gas for heavy transport. Now there seems to be a major program to use soya oil as a biofuel - probably added to diesel. Here in Brazil there is up to 26% ethanol in gasoline and the flex cars can have gasoline and pure ethanol in one tank. Major problems are solved there. Now E2G (second generation ethanol) is starting to be produced, especially for aviation fuel, which also reduces many problems. All this uses renewable fuels. Then there is the whole hydrogen story in all colours, but it seems that electric driving does have problems! Good luck with these vicissitudes, and don't forget if we have to do without sunlight for a week, the CO₂ will protect us, because that's what it was made for!!
The energy transition in this form is failing, citizens and companies are incurring enormous costs, while this would not have been necessary if policy had been made in the 90s. It is impossible to explain that everyone has to use solar panels and that they are now being scaled down because they cannot handle the electricity. Then batteries should be introduced, that is the solution, which is already proving to be disappointing, costs a lot and the return is not that bad, including the lifespan. And you can go on like this for a while with all the failures. We need sources that are controllable and that is gas and nuclear energy.
Claas 21 July 2024
The author is a true "captain Hindsight"
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Analysis Energy

More oil due to Hormuz and hope surrounding Iran pushes prices down.

Opinions Hans de Jong

US strangulation tactics keep energy prices high

Analysis Energy

Diesel becoming increasingly expensive due to lack of refining capacity

Analysis Energy

Diesel price rises due to tight market

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up