Shutterstock

Opinions Keith Maas

Central government real estate company can quickly solve 'nitrogen crisis'

14 November 2019 - Kees Maas - 25 comments

I would first like to state the following: the nitrogen crisis is not a crisis. It is a politically self-created crisis that actually does not exist. I continue to be amazed for the past few weeks.

I am surprised that there is no answer to the question of why the choices were made in the Natura 2000 file at the time. And I'm also amazed at why we don't maintain or adapt the standards that are possible within European policy, so that there is no longer a crisis mathematically. The solution I outline below is only hypothetical and in fact only feasible if politicians and officials do not continue to work with their own calculators.

Nobody knows how to deal with the problem of nitrogen and how to control agriculture. In any case, there are probably many farmers who do business around Natura 2000 areas, who have little or no prospects in the long run. Something that I think is causing the anger. Running a business without perspective is the worst thing that can happen to you. It is reminiscent of the period 1950-1960, when there were also farmers without prospects.

Hague visionaries
Visionaries in The Hague, however, had a solution for this: the Flevopolders. A new piece of land with good soil that offered farmers who were in trouble elsewhere or had no prospects a new chance. And see how it worked. The same government can now offer the farmers around Natura2000 a new perspective with the same Flevoland.

The Central Government Real Estate Agency still owns thousands of hectares of land in Flevoland, which it now leases out by auction for a short time (at the top price). The company leaves farms empty and anti-squat people live in them. In addition, we still have the Erf Foundation, which temporarily manages land for the government in Flevoland, with the aim of eventually being closed down. Stichting Erf also manages 1.000 hectares of land. We also see many sleeping tenants in Flevoland. In other words, tenants who in fact no longer farm, but who do not return the lease and who use smart constructions to occupy a farm until their death.

Close cycle
I suspect if you offer the sleeping tenant €20.000 per hectare that they are immediately prepared to surrender the lease. With these three groups together, I estimate that 6.000 hectares of agricultural land can easily be released in the short term. This opens the way for farmers in Natura2000 areas, who really want to continue farming, and offers perspective again. Livestock farmers are also very welcome for Flevoland to better close the cycle (also a narrow word) for arable farmers. 

Considering this, it all remains very special that the government itself holds the key to this and 60 years ago actually already created the solution for a possible (fictional) problem.

Keith Maas

Kees Maas is director of the DCA Group. He has more than 25 years of experience in commodities trading, both on the stock exchanges and in the physical market. Maas is a specialist in price risk management and a much sought-after sparring partner for food companies for their sales and purchasing strategy.
Comments
25 comments
creak 14 November 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10884673/rijksvastgoedbedrijf-kan-stikstofcrisis-snel-solen]Rijksvastgoedbedrijf can quickly solve 'nitrogen crisis'[/url]
Kees, all right, the player upside down. There is no crisis at all, just one created and maintained by officials.
In addition, there is also the Markermeer .... thousands of hectares (and a lot of work for all builders).
What a prospect...
gerrit 14 November 2019
The west has polluted its own nest and would like to go to the clean east.
pieter beg 14 November 2019
Kees,
I fully share your analysis
You are absolutely right to have these farmers come to Flevoland to farm on government land. In addition, I think that there is also a lot of space in the North (many farms are for sale)
tenant full of gas 14 November 2019
it is still forgotten to sell the land to the sitting tenants in order to free up money to buy market-compliant companies for the so-called nitrogen crisis
Mathilda 14 November 2019
So... what can we as citizens do about this?
All together?
antje. 14 November 2019
so that problem is also solved, but how do we get the solution to the rulers in the sphere?
jpkievit 14 November 2019
Nuclear energy has been destroyed by greenpeace. Nitrogen measurement is measured by the government by a contractor. This is not reliable. The butcher inspects his own meat. By appointing independent researchers you get a thorough report without political emotions
Peter 34 14 November 2019
@kraats. That Markermeer is being filled with rubble and sand by the same nature friends, at a cost to the taxpayer. To create an artificial Wadden area.
This is an annoyingly foolish planning decision. We desperately need that space as a freshwater storage facility for the future and now they're filling it up for the damned cormorants.
agricultural ary 14 November 2019
Moving 50 km into Germany or Belgium is much more lucrative and gives much better perspective. Smoothly milking 300 or 400 cows instead of a lot of struggle 100 in NL
D Young 14 November 2019
The solution is always right under your nose.
chubby farmer 14 November 2019
A very fine example of denial politics. I am always amazed by that. A problem that doesn't exist? A problem that has been denied for many years, head-in-the-sand politically. Still people who think that politicians like to take these kinds of measures. That they like to bully a farmer, a new hobby. When will the farmer step out of his victim role? In part, the farmer has made it himself to be confronted with measures (agriculture has nothing to do with nature these days, while we expect nature to produce), and for the other part the whole of the Netherlands has to deal with measures, as it turns out and as previously reported. The farmer does not want it, protest here, protest there. I can't, I don't want to, I don't.
But times change whether you like it or not. Keep up with the times or stay behind
Subscriber
Celsius 14 November 2019
When will people understand that agriculture is not nature and has never been and never will and can be?
Agriculture is culture
until here and no further 14 November 2019
Celsius, how is it possible that precisely in the agricultural areas there is a lot to be found, animals, plants, and in the areas of the nature organizations it is a dead mess, maybe nature needs culture, and then also because of the ignorance of the ground management organizations, their actions also intervene in all ways to achieve the goal
until here and no further 14 November 2019
as it turns out, the farmer is the best landscape manager you can imagine, but as so often, the graduates have to give their project shine, they have no practical feeling at all, and it fails again, and the farmer gets the blame via an underhand report, how pathetic
son 14 November 2019
In the Netherlands there is no nature anyway, everything has long been culture. Heathlands are the best example, which are now grassed by nitrogen deposition. They were only created by hundreds of years of overgrazing and sod removal. If you stop doing that, it will automatically return to what it once was!
Rob Smith 14 November 2019
In other words, you want to move farmers around Natura 2000 areas to the Flevopolder. And add those where they are now to the Natura 2000 areas or make it nature-inclusive agriculture or something. If you continue like this, the Lto will offer you a job Kees!!! Are you not feeling well? Polder into the marker lake and offer them that land. Then I'm for. Now just go full throttle against it and let us hear it. Not going with the flow of the past 20 years. Look where we are. Best little boy in Europe .. The cause is ourselves!!! Has always gone from swallowing and continuing again. Would say from now on it's ready... mvg Rob Smit
Gerard Lescher 14 November 2019
Totally agree.
Nico Huiskamp 14 November 2019
Nature or culture, it doesn't really matter what you call it, agriculture can also be nature in that sense. What matters to me is that the Dutch landscape is changing, change is not a bad thing. But what I do have a problem with is the fact that "life" departs from the landscape, man has taken every square centimeter as his own and made it an economic interest. this was and is partly a necessity, but partly also simply for the convenience of the farmer because it was so nice and easy to drive straight with the tractor. These fields and meadows have become dead sterile "factory sites" where food for animals or humans is produced. In some parts of the Netherlands we still see a lively cultural landscape where man has made many interventions, but in a less intensive way, so that nature also has a bit of space. That old meadow frasteri with poles, that's where meadow birds or hair can find refuge. This ditch, which has not yet been filled in, is a lush breeding ground for insects and other small animals, but also for various herbs and plants/flowers. We humans are not alone, and I believe that we as humans have no right to claim the planet as ours alone. If everyone takes a step back, there is room enough for everyone. Then the farmers can be farmers, the people can be human in a prosperous society, but there is also room for other life in addition to humans. And if you can have an eye for that, then you can consider yourself a rich person. Because that is much more true than what is in the bank account at the end of the month. Because let's face it.... the often heard cry, "there is no room for nature in a small country like the Netherlands" is a completely idiotic statement, it just depends on what choice we make as a society.... the idea that as a small country we have to feed the world by exporting 80% of our agricultural products (so that we flood many African countries with very cheap European agricultural products, thereby ruining their internal market and thereby their right to build a prosperous agricultural sector and making it a prosperous country) is even more idiotic...... isn't it?
Drent 14 November 2019
Well, you crack down on the farmers, but what do you think of the citizens? No more green garden because that requires too much maintenance, everything in the concrete is much easier, resulting in no more insects in the cities
shoemakers 1 14 November 2019
dear Nico, on the farmland, you call it factory site, is much more nature than in the protected areas, let's get rid of the provincial landscapes, natural monuments and state forest, and give it back to agriculture, you will be amazed how far nature improves
Jansen 15 November 2019
This could be a very nice solution to many 'problems'! Totally agree. Well said too.
jp 15 November 2019
Here in the region in recent years hundreds of hectares of agricultural land "reduced" for economic progress. It has halls of 10-20 ha each (including web shops). Almost no staff needed, everything automatic. Trucks come and go. No solar panels on the roofs and the rainwater can no longer enter the soil. And now the agriculture from which all that land has been taken away must also ensure that even more can be built...
Am I crazy or am I just not getting it??
Mozes 17 November 2019
Every working Dutch person solves his problems every day to earn money for The Hague.

Working Dutch people do not have lobbyists from banks with countries without equity as advisers who want to use the farmland as Building land, but first set citizens against farmers with vague models as "theoretical" support that even the scientific world distances itself from.

The aim of our lobbycracy is to subject the whole of the Netherlands to mortgages from farmer to citizen, at any price.

However, the role of politicians in this is indescribable...

Nonsense?

https://www.transparency.nl/nieuws/2018/07/onderzoek-lobbywatch-bedrijfsleven-loopt-deur-plat-rutte-iii/
Rose 17 November 2019
Isn't it that with an easterly wind a lot of dirty air comes to our country, think of the Easter fires that burn in Germany that we could observe in Amsterdam. So a glass dome over the Netherlands would be the solution. Our policy is a joke.
Mozes 20 November 2019
As long as politicians get away with: You are not the problem, but part of the solution, we don't deserve better.

What is their next sentence: gasification of the farmers is not a problem but part of the solution?

History repeats itself with his well-known grin of arrogance, day in and day out, this historian, please note, who teaches social studies in his spare time (fiction lesson and facts, Sinterklaas lesson children's party not yet understood..) does his best and loves with all his heart this amazing country..

Social historian politicians are simply too arrogant to have to study principles themselves, only proposals from lobbyists or farmers are consumed, when they are wrong they are "misinformed" passive is this insane virus called politics.

The result of training in ignorance.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Analysis milk

Validating emission quota per company is a big job

Background Business

Fertilization in NV areas increasingly under pressure

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register