Blog: Niels van der Boom

Who pays for precision farming?

14 March 2018 - Niels van der Boom - 8 comments

The use of precision farming, in the broadest sense of the word, is booming. But much remains to be done. The manufacturers are eager to offer practical sensors, software and machines. The only question is: who is going to pay for that?

More and more dairy farmers, arable farmers and contractors are tired of sitting on their hands. They invest in 'precision farming'. An abused container term, but every step towards more precision is 1 in the right direction. Manufacturers are full of conviction and offer all kinds of systems. Users sometimes take for granted that these have not always been proven in practice, or lack a scientific basis. They are forced to do their own research and pay grumbling tuition fees.

Why should a contractor have machines?

New service providers
This also applies to payroll companies. A shrinking farm population is putting pressure on contractors and margins are also under severe pressure. If you want to survive, you have to grow and distinguish yourself. An entirely new category of agricultural service providers has emerged: the drone workers. Why should a contractor have barns full of machines? That idea is outdated. Drone pilots and agricultural ICT specialists also work for wages.

The large entrepreneurs aim to 'unburden' customers. Anyone who milks 400 cows or grows 150 hectares of ware potatoes does not always feel like meddling in the harvest of roughage or the grubbing up of their product. Smart electronics, sensors and machines help turn this picture around. NIRS sensors, for example, which measure levels in the manure and fertilize exactly on the basis of NPK. The same sensor on the chopper tells you how many kilograms of dry matter enters the silage.

Investment costs
Such a sensor is far from cheap. And then we haven't even mentioned the RTK GPS systems that are an obligation, the necessary software and, last but not least, a diversity of licenses that are needed to make it all talk. Make no mistake, those costs alone run into the thousands of euros. Not a disaster, provided you can calculate those costs in the price. Why should a harvester with yield measurement or slurry tanker with NIRS sensor not cost a few euros more?

Healthy margins
With potatoes and onions of €0,20, and milk prices well above €0,35 per kilo, agricultural entrepreneurs have the healthy margin they deem essential. This means that customers immediately have the 'sustainable chain' that you read about in every press release or interview. The contractor can also bring his rates to a realistic level, making it possible to invest in the future.

A rosy scenario that, realistically, unfortunately does not become a reality. Food is and will remain cheap; also in the future. Contractors have the ball in their hands. When RTK GPS was introduced, no one changed the rates. This for fear of the customer reaction.

Next came the seed drill on the latest flexible VF tires. They are much more expensive and wear out faster. An air pressure exchange system on it and equipment to apply fertilizers in the row; preferably site specific. All those extras in the same rate. That's not even talking about the costs for fuel and personnel. The farmer also does not get paid with free potatoes for €0,03, he judges harshly and realistically.

Contractors: cherish them!

Cherish contractors
The contracting sector is undergoing a major restructuring, partly due to rising costs and low earnings. Farmers sometimes drive machines that make the contractor jealous. Bought in expensive years to cut taxes. A contractor who knows his trade is becoming a rarity. Cherish them! This is sometimes forgotten when grass, maize, potatoes and grain have to be removed after 3 weeks of rain and all customers want to harvest at the same time. Patience and realism are increasingly hard to find. The farming industry hardened. That is also a frequently heard reason for quitting.

Contractors realize this all too well: a super-deluxe fertilizer spreader on the latest tire technology may cost more. Grant the margin and in the long run it will come back to you. From the bottom and your business relationship. That is now the sustainable sector that the periphery is talking about.

Niels van der Boom

Niels van der Boom is a senior market specialist for arable crops at DCA Market Intelligence. He mainly makes analyses and market updates about the potato market. In columns he shares his sharp view on the arable sector and technology.
Comments
8 comments
jpkievit 14 March 2018
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ondernemen/blogs/column/10877861/wie-payt-voor-precisielandbouw][/url]
The consumer in ned has the cheapest and environmentally friendly food package in the world market forces can't do much about it, but like grgreenpeace false information, much more needs to be done by the entire agricultural sector
Subscriber
Martin de Rider 14 March 2018
Telling the citizen the real story, that's the most important thing! Only then can a turnaround take place. We have been working for years to tell the consumer the real story in a fun way: www.beleefheteneethet.nl
Peter34 14 March 2018
precision agriculture, robots, ICT are all tools from the stables of politics, science and iron farmers. We determine what we need on the basis of our own business situation, experience and sober consideration. In any case, all these tools have in common that it exacerbates the dependence on specialists. worsens? Yes makes things worse, because reliance on scarce external specialists means increased risk and unknown higher costs. Don't compare it to the milking robot; that is a standard daily routine and there are always several robots. In arable farming this involves a few days a year, often in constantly changing situations. What would yield more than the promises of investments in this high-flying industry or investment in care for the soil, including a broader construction plan for the next generations? The one does not completely exclude the other, but you have to set investment priorities yourself, this also includes the future exclusion of chemistry.
Peter 34 14 March 2018
for some reason this site accepts the word
spec I al I sten not and write cialis
Subscriber
Pietje dictation 14 March 2018
Specialists
the rest 14 March 2018
Totally agree with you Peter 34 .
According to the 15 March 2018
If the investment in precision agriculture does not provide benefits in terms of cost reduction or yield increase (direct or indirect), the investment falls under the "gadget" category and the buyer or user will not be willing to pay for this. If it has no added value for the customer, the customer is not willing to pay for it. This lean principle applies to all sectors, including the agricultural sector.
the rest 15 March 2018
The government can also oblige you to apply these! And then?
Jan 27 May 2018
@Theo. So what then Theo? That is an interesting point of view with an EU that devises the most absurd regulations and imposes an obligation to implement. The Brexiteers have chosen the right, although it will take a few years to get used to. We must get out of the yoke of the EU monstrosity.

That talk of then the trade suffers from it..... is trade being lectured by those law- and regulators? Then the Chinese and Indians will simply take over world trade and the NL trade is indeed only at the mercy of the EU market, with all the kul regulations imposed by Brussels. NL trade must become less dependent on the EU and enter the world market, just like the British will do. Then a Nexit is not a threat but an opportunity. I fear that Dutch politics will frustrate this in every possible way and before that time the EU will be dissolved.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up