Agricultural entrepreneurship requires multi-talent and a new discipline has been added in recent years: PR. Working with velvet gloves so as not to upset anyone, because food is inherent in emotion. However, the size is increasingly full, so that the velvet glove is exchanged for a boxing glove.
This is not a call for violence or yellow vests, but a statement of the facts. The debate has hardened. For years, the agricultural sector has allowed itself to be blackened on the internet and various platforms such as Twitter and Facebook. The counter-sound was (too) little present. The term 'fake news' is therefore not foreign to the sector.
Fake news
Incorrect figures, statements taken out of context and images that do not show the Dutch reality. These are all things that you as an entrepreneur have to choose almost every day. Previously, such nonsense was mainly predestined for clubs of like-minded people on the above platforms. However, one of the changes is the role of general media.
The farmer is embraced and everyone has an opinion about the way his food is produced. This happens in a positive sense, but much more often in a negative sense. The news, current affairs and background reports often show a colored picture, based on shadowy (political) relationships and personal beliefs.
Beating wildly around you
Environmentalists don't have 'activist' in their name for nothing. Extreme actions such as breaking into stables are not shunned to realize their ideals. What changes in 2019 is that the sector is also hardening. Various organizations have been set up for this purpose. Some (consciously) take it slow and try to provide the consumer with correct information. However, there are also other initiatives. Beating wildly around you and reacting fiercely to everything achieves little in my view.
A good example of how it should be done is the Agri Facts Foundation (STAFF† They tackle fake news based on facts. Emotion does not predominate here. The organization achieved great success in its short existence and probably not for the last time. It is distressing that it is necessary, but the sector should be happy that STAF is committed to the sector's right. For example, entrepreneurs individually (or united) are forced to defend their profession. A completely different position from promoting the sector, which has often been about in the past.
gun factor
Is reality really that negative, or is it not that bad? I do not think so. The debate is hardening visibly. Animal welfare, food safety, climate and more, the sector is directly involved. Farmers are an easy group to attack. Nice and anonymous and the loss of a company is not immediately felt. Where in the past it was often thought: 'the soup is not eaten so hot', the situation is different now. The activists flawlessly manage to control social media and mobilize a growing group of people.
To top it off, the media follows faithfully. The farmer's engine has only just started and is currently 1-0 behind. The goodwill factor is lower (farmers always complain, according to the perception) and the lines in The Hague and Hilversum are often not so smooth.
Winners
These are exciting times for the sector. You don't have to expect anything from the agriculture ministry. The backlog is not easily made up, although all weapons are now being taken out of the closet. It is positive that agricultural entrepreneurs themselves are taking up the challenge and not taking it anymore. The companies in the sector support them in this, as far as possible.
PR has become a permanent part of entrepreneurship. Not bad per se, but let's avoid the trenches. Since extremists are targeting the sector, that will be quite a task. When the smoke clears, I'm convinced the jack will stand up as the winner. There is no country in the world where such cheap, safe and high-quality food is produced as in the Netherlands. No one can get around that. Not even an environmentalist.
© DCA Market Intelligence. This market information is subject to copyright. It is not permitted to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or make the content available to third parties for compensation, in any form, without the express written permission of DCA Market Intelligence.
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10881195/hoel-langer-pikt-de-boer-het-nog]How much longer will the farmer take it?[/url]
"I am convinced that the farmer will stand up as the winner"This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10881195/hoel-langer-pikt-de-boer-het-nog]How much longer will the farmer take it?[/url]
Not me Niels.....
If all authorities, the Ministry, Wageningen University, Milk factories, Plan Bureau for the Environment, University of Twente, Banks, landlords and environmental groups do not come up with objective sounds. Once all the lies, false numbers and assumptions stop, it will be nothing here....
You see that the sustainability competition yields nothing and only has losers. The consumer wants is a well-known slogan that the dairies use to impose their power on their farmers, but you see that no consumer has started buying milk anymore. 25 million liters less in the last five years!!!
They are really not crazy, with the lies on a carton of milk, eg meadow milk all year round Zembla, backlight or inspection service of value takes a look at it and we are again millions of liters behind.
Ten thousand more rules in 8 years of Rutte!! I know very few people who enjoy their work anymore.... There is no clear strategy with the government, there is no line... and it will certainly be nothing!