Shutterstock

Opinions Niels van der Boom

Meet the zombie farm

9 February 2022 - Niels van der Boom - 8 comments

No, this is not a script for a horror movie. Zombie companies are an existing economic phenomenon. Are there zombie farms? Companies that actually have no right to exist, but are active. How many companies are we talking about and what is the impact on the agricultural sector?

The seed for this opinion was planted during a conversation I had with a colleague. It concerned the potato contract prices in relation to the cost price. I stated that these have been growing apart for years and that the cost price is not fully covered by the contract price. My colleague responded very aptly with the question: "How is it that when I drive through an arable area, I see new storage sheds in many places, new tractors in the country and even new potato harvesters or sprayers that cost half a million."

Thick sandwich
I had to owe him the answer. Indeed, based on the sale of new material, the addition of barns and the purchase of very expensive agricultural land, you can only conclude that the arable farmer earns a very big living. For a little tractor you lose more than a ton. At the same time, the price of agricultural land continues to reach records.

I am currently reading the book 'Keerpunt 1971' by macro-economist and Boerenbusiness-house guest Edin Mujagi. There I became acquainted with the term 'zombie companies'. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the definition of zombie company is a company that is at least ten years old and has been unable to meet its interest obligations for three years in a row. When I read the term, the question came up: do zombie farms exist? I think that question can only be answered with yes.

The Zombie Farm
The zombie farm is (I think) the answer to the question asked earlier: why do I see (at first sight) successful companies while at the same time I am told that crop prices are (far) below cost. Answer: That's a zombie farm. A new tractor, sprayer or harvester is leased at very attractive interest rates thanks to our 'debt company'. The new storage shed was built because the value under the company is being considered: the soil. The reason why so much can be invested by the sector.

Even in regions with traditionally low agricultural land prices, prices have exploded. In 2022, €95.000 per hectare must also be paid for one hectare of drought-sensitive sandy soil. That surprises me even more than polder land that has risen to €170.000.

Crop yield
There is nothing wrong with the fact that the value of the land has increased enormously since the 90s. At the same time it is a difficult thing, because it is stuck in your company. No one has ever become a farmer by selling land. A farmer lives poor and dies rich, I learned when I started working in the sector. That statement is not without reason. It's great that you are building your business on this basis, but it can disguise 'zombie entrepreneurship'. Apparently things are going well – judging by the activities in the yard – but it has nothing to do with the yield of the cultivation or other entrepreneurial activities.

In his book, Mujagić mentions extremely low interest rates as an important tool for zombie companies. You can't ignore that in this sector either. Not only can machines be leased attractively, the interest costs per hectare can also be kept low and land can be purchased at ever-increasing prices. If the interest rate rises only a few tenths of a percent, then the proverbial mess breaks out. Another parallel can be drawn with the overall debt society. Don't pay off a loan, but borrow more. Borrow for land, borrow for buildings, borrow for machines. Sometimes that is purely outward display of power to appear more successful than the neighbor. That also keeps an entire sector working, but the margins are paper thin. A leased tractor is often quickly exchanged for a new one, or a rental construction must offer a solution as soon as the interest and repayment cannot be paid. Everything to put a new copy on the dam. Anyone who still buys a tractor is crazy, you will almost believe.

Young farmers
Why is a zombie farm an undesirable phenomenon? After all, the dealer has a tractor to maintain and the barn builder is not short of work either. In the long run, a zombie farm is crippling the industry. A zombie farm does not invest in its land, innovate in new cultivation methods and do not take product quality to the next level. Nor do they do anything to improve market prices. That takes away opportunities for young entrepreneurs and does not help the sector to reach an overall higher level.

If you look at the challenges that lie ahead in the short (up to three years) and medium term (five to ten years), they are huge for farmers. After an hour of explanation about the new CAP or the 7e Nitrates Directive action program you have lost track. We haven't even mentioned a thinning package of resources, increasing animal welfare requirements, nitrogen regulations and a challenging sales market. Only as a top entrepreneur with a healthy company can you meet these challenges. You cannot be green when you are red, the VTA (Verenigde Telers Akkerbouw) has been saying for years.

Creative destruction
Let's go back for a moment to Keerpunt 1971. In it, Mujagić talks about creative destruction. A process in which continuous innovation makes the old techniques and methods superfluous (destroys them). This process alone ensures economic growth. In agriculture, this process has already been started before the war, but zombie farms throw sand in the engine. Do as we have always done and do not innovate. The companies that do not innovate stand still and disappear over time. This process is no stranger to the sector either, but it is currently slowing down.

The current corona support measures, but also unprecedented subsidy amounts for new machines, ensure that zombie farmers can survive more easily. If you look at the challenges listed above, it is not the zombie farmer who comes out as the winner. I remain positive about the future, but a future without zombie farms.

Niels van der Boom

Niels van der Boom is a senior market specialist for arable crops at DCA Market Intelligence. He mainly makes analyses and market updates about the potato market. In columns he shares his sharp view on the arable sector and technology.
Comments
8 comments
Subscriber
Fountains 9 February 2022
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10896603/meet-the-zombie farm]Meet the zombie farm[/url]
I had never heard the term zombie farm but recognize our agriculture in it
We have been the buffer of the economy for years when it comes to inflation
Everything is getting more expensive and we have to pay more and more for the same amount, but because of inflation, that's two times and then we are lost over the years.
In 1990 you could buy 1 liters of petrol for 160 ton of beets and with a beet price of €45 per ton that is today a maximum of 25 liters
That's how it is with everything
The rack had been out for years and we are walking on the gums and in reserve time
Subscriber
qīngwā 9 February 2022
If you can't afford it, don't lease it!
9 February 2022
The bill for maintaining the production volume at all costs is placed with the farmer, we also know this in pig farming and it causes the aforementioned problems.

Witnesses
Average net operating result sow farm 2021: -343.500€ Net operating result 2020: -63.000€ euro
Net operating profit from 2001 is -728.000 euros, which is an average of -34.667 euros per year
Last 5 years net operating profit +25.900€, per year: +5.180
Last 10 years net operating profit -69.900€, per year: -6.990€

fattening pigs

Average net operating result fattening pig farm 2021: -13.300€ Net operating result 2020: -80.500€
Net operating profit from 2001 is -404.500 euros, per year -19.262€
Last 5 years net operating profit +71.300€, per year: +14.260
Last 10 years net operating profit +12.000€, per year: +1.200

Closed company

Average net operating result closed business with sows and fattening pigs 2021: -236.300€ Net operating result 2020: -198.700€
Net operating profit from 2001 is -627.400 euros, per year -29.876€,
Last 5 years net operating result +184.500€, per year: +36.900€
Net operating profit +10€, per year: +71.200€
Ben 9 February 2022
The problem also arises because the state of "debt after termination" is too high, for many only the option (for generations) remains and lives from the till.
Subscriber
Arie poor branch. 10 February 2022
I agree with Ben that in many cases it is as he outlines.
On the other hand, I could give him arable farms
show that usually keep the business running without the bank with up-to-date machinery and modern
preservation. I also know that in many cases the farmers in question were able to start in a fairly staggered bed and therefore started with a head start
compared to many others. Yet I think that for many companies there is low hanging fruit that does not become or does not want to
being seen. Then I am thinking of clustering machines, joint purchasing of all necessities. Anyone doing what he or she is good at.
In the case of overstaffing, having 1 or more people look for a job where he or she might feel more at home and also a boost to the
Yincome gives. There are undoubtedly more things to mention. Maybe I'm chasing some people into the tallest tree and I'm not a communist either, but I believe the above is a passable one for many companies. Away is.
Subscriber
quite coarse 10 February 2022
Arie, you are more than right, a lot of money leaks here and there or it won't be picked up!
Especially in a spread-bed, one often becomes complacent and lazy.
No development without setbacks.
Henk 10 February 2022
Arie is right, as a farmer there is a lot of money to be made by negotiating with suppliers and buyers, the money is with these wealthy parties. Laziness in this area indeed makes poor.
Subscriber
Arie poor branch. 11 February 2022
I agree with Ben that in many cases it is as he outlines.
On the other hand, I could give him arable farms
show that usually keep the business running without the bank with up-to-date machinery and modern
preservation. I also know that in many cases the farmers in question were able to start in a fairly staggered bed and therefore started with a head start
compared to many others. Yet I think that for many companies there is low hanging fruit that does not become or does not want to
being seen. Then I am thinking of clustering machines, joint purchasing of all necessities. Anyone doing what he or she is good at.
In the case of overstaffing, having 1 or more people look for a job where he or she might feel more at home and also a boost to the
Yincome gives. There are undoubtedly more things to mention. Maybe I'm chasing some people into the tallest tree and I'm not a communist either, but I believe the above is a passable one for many companies. Away is.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Opinions Niels van der Boom

Holman unleashes unjustified potato witch hunt

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register