Shutterstock

Opinions Pascal Phillips

Why am I not paying more for food?

3 October 2019 - Pascal Philipsen - 5 comments

I have gathered all my courage to confess 'au public'. I myself do not have a farming background, but have been working for and with farmers for many years (in the field of soil and animal health). In the meantime, I know how the hares run in the sector. Above all, I really enjoyed the dynamic branch of sport and received great appreciation for the livestock farmers, arable farmers, nurserymen, fishermen and gardeners.

On closer inspection, and after a few moments of self-reflection, my big peasant heart turns out to be a lot smaller than I thought. And here comes my confession.. I buy my groceries according to the principle of 'watching the little ones'. Our family occasionally goes for the kilo blaster and the Kenyan green bean. Nice in 1 large supermarket around the corner. In short: 'Long get it, get home soon'.

'Instant happiness'
As an employee of a mineral producer, I earn from the skilled and passionate farmer, while the farmer earns nothing from me. It is true that they get returns from concepts that we advise as a company, but I (as an individual) keep a close eye on the purse strings. I seriously ask myself why I am not contributing to fair trade and sustainability; nota bene because I myself regularly stand in the clay or stable. So I do know that a lot is involved in the production of meat, milk and vegetables.

Like many others, I am a meaningless herd animal. We have all become individuals, with the motto 'I live my life'. As that individual, I move among 7,5 billion people. In my view, it rubs off on individualism and globalization. We are no longer part of a small, manageable collective (community/village) and no longer listen to the police officer, teacher or pastor. We want to control our own freedom, but with our small, lonely brains we cannot handle this large and complex world. We are constantly searching for our meaning and often we create it at the expense of the truth.

Meaning should lead to so-called 'instant happiness'. Some look for it in ideals, after which the screaming group mainly follows. Not forming an opinion based on facts, but based on sentiment and based on whoever shouts the loudest. Others keep looking for a lifetime. "We have become slaves to our own meaning", reports the Flemish philosopher and psychiatrist Damiaan Denys.

A far-from-my-bed show
And this (my) behavior change has everything to do with it; especially if we as individuals in the big, bad world want to pursue our own happiness. Paying more for food on your own initiative does not touch your core. It doesn't affect you personally. It does not bring 'instant happiness', but personal unhappiness. After all, you have less money to spend. Doing more for a better climate often feels like a small drop in a large, glowing plate as an individual. We no longer see the susceptible collective, because it is no longer there.

The street, the village, the church, the small community. These could bring about behavioral change in favor of that same community. Nowadays everyone and everything is anonymous. Much is 'the far-from-my-bed show'. The farmer used to be part of that small community. Not a big unknown like now. On the contrary, the farmer and his wife were people of prestige. Since you knew them personally, there was understanding and appreciation. The sense of community and understanding for the other is now hard to find.

It seems like problems don't exist
The tension between animal welfare and nature on the one hand and efficient food production on the other seems to cause a widening between farmer and citizen (if this has not yet been done). However, we have not yet succeeded in asking for and at the same time voluntarily paying for sustainably produced products. This gives you the freedom of the individual. Valuing food in money does not give 'instant happiness': because who can guarantee that when I buy 2 star pork, these pigs and the pig farmer concerned will actually do better? I give my money to the supermarket, not the farmer. And I never see happy cashiers.

Moreover, the problems of our farmers are absorbed into all the problems of the world, which we as individuals cannot do anything about. Those problems are hidden far away and anonymously, it seems as if they do not exist. And if they do get through to us, then the challenges are too great for us as 'individuals between 7,5 billion people'. With those evolutionary survival tactics we manage to hold our own as loners.

Out of sight out of mind
The industrialization of the sector, in combination with urbanization, has directly created a physical distance between farmers and citizens. 'Out of sight, out of mind or unknown makes unloved'. There are already many great initiatives to bring these 2 groups (farmer and citizen) together, the citizen is invited to take a look in the greenhouse or in the stable. I think many families see a visit to a farmer as a 'nice day out'.

However, the split in which many farmers find themselves remains unnamed. They certainly want to take steps towards a more sustainable, robust circular agriculture and they want to hand over their agricultural business to the next generation with love. However, the consumer will then have to move along.

Manufacturing
The 'Our farm' program by Yvon Jaspers shows the 'ups and downs' of the farmers, whereby often the same obstacles emerge: environmental standards are decisive and by no means unambiguous and the cost price (including all sustainability requirements) is hardly covered by the sales price. Families are in danger of going under or moving abroad. If this pace continues, the Netherlands will slowly lose another manufacturing industry, but this time a sector with immense impact on employment, the economy, food safety and food security. BoerBurgerBeweging is approaching to exert direct influence on legislation and regulations from the political arena and also to reach out to the citizen.

Behavioral change in the field of food appreciation is impossible. I am a good example of that myself. Because, despite my notion of farm life, I am capable of ignoring sustainable food options. The social setting and the individualism embedded in it cannot be changed in the short term. That is why the government must intervene by regulating food prices to preserve our natural landscape and the food producer. Just force me into the supermarket, otherwise I'll reach around unsuspectingly again. I understand why.

Pascal Phillips

Pascal Philipsen is regional manager for the South of the Netherlands and fertilization specialist at Timac Agro Nederland.
Comments
5 comments
Karin 3 October 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10884203/Why-I don't pay more for food]Why don't I pay more for food?[/url]
Thank you for your candor.
This is exactly what is going on. And the middlemen/supermarket will benefit from it.

However impeded sometimes for entrepreneurs, quotas and guaranteed prices (regulation) are necessary to give the farmer a fair share.

In other cases too

eg Minimum wage, transport rates for electricity and the rates of eg dentists have been agreed.
has 3 October 2019
the robbery is precisely the problem because food is included in the purchasing power calculation, so the government has no interest in more expensive food. because purchasing power is sacred in politics.
manon 3 October 2019

Why should the food have to be even more expensive? That makes no sense to me, the problem is that the chain is not fairly distributed. An example: a farmer can currently get a dime for his dried onions, but in the meantime this same onion is in the store for more than a euro to 1,55 and I don't call that fair trade, I have been saying this for years, all municipalities present themselves as a fair trade municipality, but their own farmers forget them, they have no idea what the farmer gets for his product and what the shop asks for it because the official within these municipalities is already miles away from the hard-working farmer and that is politics. Politicians believe that farmers are millionaires and that the water board costs for farmers can be increased by percentages, another example that it is especially politics (which now also have their place in the water boards) that creates this image about the farmer. , and now that politicians call the farmer the biggest polluter and want to impose even more rules, while the big boys and polluters such as e.g. the industry in the Netherlands, which provide us with luxury, remain unaffected. Take Action, a cheap store, where ships full of containers are sailed here to offer the cheapest possible product, Schiphol which is allowed to expand while the air pollution is highest there, but we all want to go on holiday to luxurious places . The hard-working farmer is no longer interesting in this thoroughly spoiled society that no longer knows what working weeks of 70 to 80 hours are. Food is the final item of the budget and used to be the largest expense item. One was rich if one had the potatoes, the fuel, the cabbage in the coop and the bacon in the chimney, now one goes to the food bank for the food that would otherwise be thrown away because it is expired while it can still be eaten easily, another rule devised by the government, in the past people knew themselves what was no longer good and could no longer be eaten, you could smell and taste that, but we have become so sterile that our body can absorb it even more . Food is neglected and must be cheap, and preferably exotic as well, because you don't eat ordinary white cabbage??, that's so "farming", no luxury it must be, look at the star restaurants, what's on offer what you are served with vegetables and meat?, there is then a bed of asparagus, then I see that this is half an asparagus which has been cut in three, and that is the bed of asparagus, but may be expensive getting paid.
Ton Westgeest 3 October 2019
Manon everything revolves around manipulation, from the government.

Farmers receive subsidies to keep food as cheap as possible, otherwise inflation would become too high and additionally: they keep the farmers in line.
Everything has to be big, the largest stable has the most subsidy. The largest mortgage with the lowest interest at the banks. multinationals the bigger, the less tax. The bigger the supermarkets, the cheaper they can get the products. At the dairy, most milk paid the highest.

But something is going on now...they have completely lost control and there is now panic in all sectors!

That's called market forces, they say...... that they have destroyed the most with it, they apparently don't care. They all have a nice job and after a few years they have an even nicer job.

The most beautiful and current example is Tjeerd de Groot. As director of NZO, he argued in favor of expanding milk production. He wanted to accelerate the milk production ...... Now he has another nice job and what does he say now?????
jpkievit 3 October 2019
50 years, food prices in the shops are 25% low. Started in my working life as a fruit grower through the land consolidation with 7ha in 1970, then earned a well-invested sandwich. I stopped with 15 ha and no successor and can't pay all the charges, I call this a rate race. will pay a higher price and that dimmed for agricultural sales will be silenced
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register