The value of agricultural land is reaching record highs. While farmers fight for every hectare, investors see land as a safe haven, and governments are using it as a key to the spatial transition. This scarcity turns land into strategic capital, with consequences for entrepreneurship, policy, and investments.
For farmers, land remains the backbone of their business, but expansion is becoming increasingly difficult. Space is limited, regulations are complex, and prices continue to rise. According to the Land Registry, the average price for agricultural land in the first quarter of 2025 was €91.300 per hectare; grassland averaged €82.500, and arable land even €100.600. Land is therefore no longer just a means of production, but also a stable investment. An additional hectare, for example, means more space for manure application, more flexibility in the crop rotation plan, and often also more security for the future.
Farmers foughtn for scarce acres
Especially in regions with fertile soil or favorable locations, demand remains high and competition fierce. For dairy farmers and arable farmers, acquiring land has become a strategic choice, not only for production but also for business security and capital growth. In family businesses, land forms the foundation of continuity: those who own sufficient hectares can better absorb fluctuations in yield or costs and maintain control over the future. Due to the significant scarcity of land, vigilance is increasingly important, otherwise you'll often miss out. Furthermore, you still have to regularly consider a sale by tender. This is becoming increasingly common and generally leads to price increases.
Land as a safe haven
Not only farmers, but also investors have discovered the value of agricultural land. "Land is like gold," said Jos Ebbers, chairman of the NVM Agricultural & Rural Estate, recently. The comparison seems apt: land prices remain remarkably stable, even in economically uncertain times. According to Rabobank, prices are expected to remain stable or rise slightly by 0 to 5% in 2025. This makes land a tangible, low-risk investment that offers protection against inflation and currency depreciation.
Investors base their interest in agricultural land on three pillars: structural scarcity—after all, no new land is being added—versatile potential uses (agriculture, energy, infrastructure, housing), and stable value growth. Investing in land, however, requires expertise: location, soil quality, and legal status largely determine the ultimate return. A plot of land near urban expansion or energy facilities has a different future prospect than land used exclusively for agriculture.
The government as a silent player in the land market
Agricultural land is not only economically valuable but also politically sensitive. For governments, it is a scarce commodity that affects housing, climate, nature, and energy. Demand for land is increasing, while the Netherlands is not growing. This creates tensions between agriculture and policy: farmers are confronted with nitrogen regulations, expropriation, or changes to the function of their land. Regional differences are significant. In Flevoland, where a lot of land is also being purchased for spatial development, the average price is now €184.100 per hectare, the highest in the Netherlands. To maintain control over the market, the government uses instruments such as the Municipalities' Preferential Rights Act and exit regulations. In this way, it tries to prevent increases in value from remaining entirely in private hands and crowding out public interests. Land has thus become a policy instrument that helps determine the course of the spatial transition.
New collaborations between farmers and investors
High prices are forcing farmers to adopt more creative business practices. For some agricultural entrepreneurs, direct purchase is unfeasible, making leaseholds, long leases, or partnerships with investors more attractive. In such structures, farmers hold the right to use the land, while investors primarily benefit from increased value. Regional land banks and cooperative models are also emerging, where farmers jointly invest in expansion or sustainability improvements. At the same time, the number of investment funds focused on sustainable land development, for example, through carbon capture and storage, nature management, or energy generation, is growing. This also gives land social value: as a driver of the climate transition.
From means of production to strategic capital
The role of agricultural land is changing rapidly. Where once it was primarily about production, it now also revolves around spatial claims, sustainability, and future value. Social pressure on land use is increasing, while farmers feel their leeway is shrinking. The challenge lies in finding a balance: how do we keep agriculture profitable and space available for other purposes? A rapid change in function can harm food production and farmers' revenue models, but smart collaboration between agriculture, energy, and nature actually creates opportunities. Think of agricultural nature management, solar farms or nature development on less fertile plots, or land exchanges within area development. Those who understand the dynamics of the land market and are forward-thinking can benefit from this, whether it's about business security, returns, or policy. Land may be worth its weight in gold, but its true value lies in good stewardship and sustainable use.
© DCA Market Intelligence. This market information is subject to copyright. It is not permitted to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or make the content available to third parties for compensation, in any form, without the express written permission of DCA Market Intelligence.
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/column/10914919/gouden-grond-stil-kapitaal-boeren-beleggers-overheid]Golden ground: silent capital farmers, investors, government[/url]
Just look at what inflation has been. €70.000 in 2010 will be €101.000 in 2025. So, adjusted for inflation, land prices have risen much less than they initially appear.
Just look at what inflation has been. €70.000 in 2010 will be €101.000 in 2025. So, adjusted for inflation, land prices have risen much less than they initially appear.
term wrote:Land has been a fantastic investment, everyone agrees on that. And then there's the crop yield.Just look at what inflation has been. €70.000 in 2010 will be €101.000 in 2025. So, adjusted for inflation, land prices have risen much less than they initially appear.
Unless you stop farming and your land falls into box 3. And yes, the measure has been postponed for two years, but it will eventually happen anyway...
Can you eat from that then, from appreciation?
Southwest wrote:No, you can't eat that. There's a saying: Live poor, die rich. Best wishes to everyone, and enjoy your life.Can you eat from that then, from appreciation?
Everyone thinks the land can only go up. But that's certainly not true. I've seen land sold for the then-exorbitant price of 60000 guilders. Two years later, it was on the market again for less than half that price, and then it went away.
gerard wrote:It's a frightening time for farmers. What product yields enough to make a €100.000 return on land profitable? Even if you have the money. I know it yields little to nothing in the bank, maybe 1% if you're lucky. There are, of course, several investment options, and not all without risks. What I'm saying is that it's a thin proposition. Just calculate the return on wheat and beets, using yields from 11 tons of wheat at €178, and 100 tons of beets with an 18% yield. It all seems to be becoming structural, and where are we then?Everyone thinks the land can only go up. But that's certainly not true. I've seen land sold for the then-exorbitant price of 60000 guilders. Two years later, it was on the market again for less than half that price, and then it went away.
time bomb wrote:I sometimes think, shouldn't you sell something now, pay off the bank and continue farming without debt with a smaller area, who knows, in a few years you might be able to buy double the amount againgerard wrote:It's a frightening time for farmers. What product yields enough to make a €100.000 return on land profitable? Even if you have the money. I know it yields little to nothing in the bank, maybe 1% if you're lucky. There are, of course, several investment options, and not all without risks. What I'm saying is that it's a thin proposition. Just calculate the return on wheat and beets, using yields from 11 tons of wheat at €178, and 100 tons of beets with an 18% yield. It all seems to be becoming structural, and where are we then?Everyone thinks the land can only go up. But that's certainly not true. I've seen land sold for the then-exorbitant price of 60000 guilders. Two years later, it was on the market again for less than half that price, and then it went away.
gerard wrote:It's a frightening time for farmers. What product yields enough to make a €100.000 return on land profitable? Even if you have the money. I know it yields little to nothing in the bank, maybe 1% if you're lucky. There are, of course, several investment options, and not all without risks. What I'm saying is that it's a thin proposition. Just calculate the return on wheat and beets, using yields from 11 tons of wheat at €178, and 100 tons of beets with an 18% yield. It all seems to be becoming structural, and where are we then?Everyone thinks the land can only go up. But that's certainly not true. I've seen land sold for the then-exorbitant price of 60000 guilders. Two years later, it was on the market again for less than half that price, and then it went away.
Those still buying land have money lying around or have mostly paid off their debts. Those who have to borrow almost everything to buy it can no longer keep up.
juun wrote:Not true, there are always entrepreneurs who are able to buy back. They might sell it directly to ASR, just like the Meermannen, but hey, money has to be made.Those still buying land have money lying around or have mostly paid off their debts. Those who have to borrow almost everything to buy it can no longer keep up.
juun wrote:Not true, there are always entrepreneurs who are able to buy back. They might sell it directly to ASR, just like the Meermannen, but hey, money has to be made.Those still buying land have money lying around or have mostly paid off their debts. Those who have to borrow almost everything to buy it can no longer keep up.
juun wrote:Not true, there are always entrepreneurs who are able to buy back. They might sell it directly to ASR, just like the Meermannen, but hey, money has to be made.Those still buying land have money lying around or have mostly paid off their debts. Those who have to borrow almost everything to buy it can no longer keep up.
Janusz wrote:That they're not actual buyers, but leaseholders who are thus offsetting that down payment. It remains to be seen who can buy it back afterward.juun wrote:Not true, there are always entrepreneurs who are able to buy back. They might sell it directly to ASR, just like the Meermannen, but hey, money has to be made.Those still buying land have money lying around or have mostly paid off their debts. Those who have to borrow almost everything to buy it can no longer keep up.
gerard wrote:It's a frightening time for farmers. What product yields enough to make a €100.000 return on land profitable? Even if you have the money. I know it yields little to nothing in the bank, maybe 1% if you're lucky. There are, of course, several investment options, and not all without risks. What I'm saying is that it's a thin proposition. Just calculate the return on wheat and beets, using yields from 11 tons of wheat at €178, and 100 tons of beets with an 18% yield. It all seems to be becoming structural, and where are we then?Everyone thinks the land can only go up. But that's certainly not true. I've seen land sold for the then-exorbitant price of 60000 guilders. Two years later, it was on the market again for less than half that price, and then it went away.
With ASR you grow your business, but you are the last captain at the helm
Jan wrote:We don't know what the future holds. Around 1930-1935, agricultural land was unsellable. What happened then isn't impossible today. You might have recently bought land for €100.000 or more, and the price will plummet—because that's not going to happen slowly—to €25.000, and you'll be the last captain at the helm. I know you shouldn't look back, but history often repeats itself. Given the times we live in, it's a bit like the old days. I've read many books about those years and the war, and I see similarities. My grandfather bought a 40-hectare farm (1933), prime land with buildings, for 4.000 guilders per hectare. I don't want to scare or worry anyone, because it's been 90 years, but it gives food for thought and keeps a close eye on the situation. ASR could also take a hit!With ASR you grow your business, but you are the last captain at the helm
I think €30.000 per hectare of financing is quite a lot at a time when things have been going badly for many years in a row. On an entire company you are talking about large numbers.
If you want to make progress, financing of €30.000 per hectare is quite realistic and responsible. You can also farm small-scale without a mortgage. It just depends on your preference.