Blog: Peter Goumans

Can the phosphate reduction plan be guaranteed at all?

16 January 2017 - Peter Goumans - 6 comments

In order to remove the objections of the European Commission against the introduction of the system of phosphate rights, a package of measures has been drawn up to illegally reduce phosphate production to the level permitted by the Derogation Directive. I have described that package of measures in my blog: Phosphate rights triple jump.

From 2018 legal guarantee is possible. The phosphate reduction package consists of 3 tracks. The feed track, reduction of the livestock and the phosphate reduction plan of the dairy companies. State Secretary Van Dam outlined the contours of this package in his letter of 18 November 2016 to the House of Representatives. This package of measures is the result of agreements reached within the sector. In order to ensure that the necessary phosphate reduction is actually achieved, the agreements reached will have to be implemented. How is this secured?

the feeding track
The aim is to achieve a phosphate reduction of 1,7 million kilos via the feed track. The animal feed industry has already introduced this measure on 1 January 2017. The gross phosphorus content in the milk compound feed is monitored via monitoring and monthly reporting. The animal feed industry is therefore self-steering.

livestock reduction
State Secretary Van Dam is developing a plan to achieve a reduction in the dairy herd, the main points of which will be announced later this month. This measure aims to achieve a phosphate reduction of 2,5 million kg. It remains to be seen whether the scheme is sufficiently attractive to induce dairy farmers to voluntarily reduce their livestock.

Phosphate reduction plan DairyNL
ZuivelNL aims to achieve a phosphate reduction of 14 million kg with the plan it published on 2016 December 4 (reduction via a milk money scheme or removal of LUs: large livestock units). This part of the package of measures is therefore crucial to achieve the intended goal. But it is precisely for this part of the package of measures that the cooperation of all market parties involved is required. This cooperation will not be obtained from everyone on a voluntary basis.

There are legal doubts

Declare generally binding
Initially, State Secretary Van Dam had the idea of ​​safeguarding the implementation of the phosphate reduction plan through public assurance and a declaration of the plan generally binding. Because this requires a notification procedure based on the integrated common market organization (IGMO), the State Secretary considered the risk too high that the processing time would be too long. Van Dam therefore waives this method of assurance.

Agriculture Act?
Van Dam now sees an opportunity in the Agriculture Act to include ZuivelNL's phosphate reduction plan in a generally binding regulation through a ministerial regulation. State Secretary Van Dam suggested this idea in a letter to the House of Representatives dated 30 December 2016. The ministerial regulation is now being worked out and should be published by February 2017 at the latest in order to enter into force on 1 March.

On the basis of which articles from the Agriculture Act, State Secretary Van Dam believes he can include the phosphate reduction plan in a ministerial regulation, he does not explain. The State Secretary uses vague terms and suffices with a reference to the Agriculture Act and no more than that. Whether this option is realistic and legally tenable can therefore only be assessed when the ministerial regulation is presented. But there are already question marks.

Later this month, State Secretary Van Dam will present the main features of the scheme for voluntary reduction of the dairy herd, and there may already be a view on the ministerial regulation under the Agriculture Act. As soon as there is news, a new blog will follow.

Peter Goumans

Peter Goumans is a lawyer at Hekkelman. He focuses on the agricultural sector and closely follows developments in this sector. In his blogs he discusses legal issues in the agricultural sector.
Comments
6 comments
Ton Westgeest 16 January 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ondernemen/columns/column/10873020/Kan-phosphate reduction plan-überhaupt-be-geborgd?-]Can the phosphate reduction plan be guaranteed at all?[/url]
Doesn't anyone see that Van Dam is fooling the whole thing.... He creates a mist of rules that no one can get out of, that no one is happy with, that cannot be guaranteed, which encourages plenty of fraud, some can nothing else to keep running.... The elections are approaching, Van Dam is leaving, the EU is not taking it and we have lost the derogation. This is not a policy. This PvdA man has had it behind his elbows from the start....
Iron 16 January 2017
Recognizability of what is said with regard to our political representative. Think of van Aartsen and Brinkhorst. Unfortunately we have to conclude this. And yet we know agriculture that the noose will be very big for Rural Netherlands. Upscaling contributes to politics itself through the regulatory framework in which agriculture and horticulture have found themselves over the past few years, from 95 to the present. Every sector in our broad beautiful profession is brought into deliberate miscredit for a period of time, leaving too many open ends on hold. Also by political parties that talk about matters about which people consciously or unconsciously have no knowledge.
@FarmersUnitedNL 16 January 2017
We are sadly put back in terms of animal numbers to roughly 1-4-2015. Growth in volume of milk will come more from an increase in production per animal and better mineral utilization, which must be guaranteed by Kringloopwijzer.

I hope to keep the derogation

I am also more concerned in the future about the fact that our animals have a large under-appreciation, but our dairy has little distinctive character, which means that we do not receive nearly the economic cost price.

The cost price, including labor and compensation on equity, is a must for a stable future. FF wiping the bills off the kitchen table and then saying you get enough is nice for the short term but not for a healthy future of the company including opportunities for business takeover by the children.

Choose for yourself what is most threatening in the long run.
Appie 16 January 2017
Just ground bound
peter 16 January 2017
ground-bound and we know where we stand for the next 30 years!
Ton Westgeest 16 January 2017
Do you think, Peter, that Van Dam has it? The next 30 years? He has no farm, no land, no problems with succession, no bank in his neck, no milk factory googling his money and not bothered by the absurd rules.... Only a very nice job in Brussels or wherever then!
milker 16 January 2017
The bomb is going to burst..... The derogation 2018 and later expires, there will be (a lot of) pain and the big ones will make it, the sleepers can stay the night... When will it be announced that the derogation of 2017 will expire?
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up