Blog: Piet van der Eijk

Do leases take over your own shadow?

June 26, 2017 - Piet van der Eijk - 7 comments

The importance of lease. You don't have to tell me that, you'll say. However, that does not apply to everyone. Every now and then I get the feeling that many - including stewards and their clients and even leaseholders and policy makers - are insufficiently aware of the importance of leasehold.

For centuries, lease has been a way of using land without owning it. Preceded by crisis lease legislation in 1937, the legal position of the tenant has been guaranteed in law since 1958. The separation between use and ownership was necessary, because land has always been too expensive to achieve a rewarding agricultural exploitation.

From an investment point of view, land has hardly ever been too expensive in retrospect; the increase in value has more than made up for the purchase price. The farmer who also owns his land is in fact also an investor. The importance of lease as a financing instrument for agriculture is apparent from art. 7:327 paragraph 1 of the Dutch Civil Code and the Lease Prices Decree based thereon.

Lease income sometimes not enough to pay the costs

Exemption would be more appropriate 
In addition, the law offers protection to the lessee, whereby the interests of the lessor are not lost sight of. Leased land is also a proven safe and stable investment for the lessor, with an attractive return through lease income and an increase in value. The lease prices are, however, limited by the Lease Prices Decree. However, for (private) lessees, the rental income is sometimes not sufficient to pay the costs, in particular the capital yield tax on a notional return of 4% of the leased value.

Precisely because of this legal limitation on the amount of the lease, the legislator should levy the capital yield tax for lessors on the income actually earned. An exemption would even be appropriate to promote sustainable use through long-term lease contracts. In practice, the lessor of free land seeks refuge in liberalized lease.

High lease prices encourage intensive construction plan

Soil quality on the decline
For extra hectares, there are always farmers who do not have to add extra costs to the means of production that they already have (machines, buildings and labour). This has been permitted since 1995 via the one-off lease and since 2007 via the liberalized lease form. This solution is not sustainable: the quality of the soil often deteriorates, if only because the high lease prices require an intensive construction plan.

Finally, lease - also for companies with (partial) ownership - is important for business succession. This week we will hear from the mediator's findings. I am curious whether the parties have stepped over their own shadow in order to maintain and expand leases for Dutch agriculture in the future in the interests of all parties. 

Peter van der Eijk

Piet van der Eijk was the chairman of the Association of Land Tenants and Own Land Users (BLHB) from 2012 to the beginning of 2019. He also has an arable farm in the Biesbosch polder in the outskirts of the Eiland van Dordrecht.
Comments
7 comments
boer June 28, 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ondernemen/blogs/column/10874983/stappen-pachtpartijen-over-eigen-shadow][/url]
The good intentions of the old lease law have not worked out well in practice.

Conclusion;
Everyone wants to be a farmer.
But you should not want to remain a tenant.

The question is;
How do you currently get an owner to make his assets available in a sustainable manner without losing too much freedom of action and asset value?
geert June 28, 2017
The lease price is good for investors, there is even demand for land here by institutional investors, even churches buy land here, money in the bank hardly yields any interest
geert June 28, 2017
Ordinary tenants are currently finding it very difficult to pay the relatively high rent, especially after a year with a bad milk price. Many are still in arrears with suppliers.
boer June 29, 2017
Dear Gert and Pete,
If a landowner has land that has a free market value of 80000 euros and there is still a mortgage debt of 20000 euros at 4% interest, then the costs for the owner/user are 800 euros per year. This is offset by operating income to cover these costs.
This premise is better than renting.
If this owner wants to stop but does not want to sell but to start leasing and he manages that at the bank, then it goes without saying that the interest charges of 800 must be passed on to the tenant. Subsequently, a tax return is levied on the leased value of this land. (Box 1 to Box 3) After all, the owner is no longer an entrepreneur. With a 4% levy of 60% of 80000 euros, you have a return of 1920 euros according to the tax. If 40% tax has to be paid on this, the owner will be 768 euros per year poorer. It is therefore logical that these expenses should at least be added to the lease in order not to deteriorate. In other words, the lease will have to be at least 800+768 euros. The 2000 euro is more appealing in this example.
See here the dilemma which in practice is becoming an increasing problem for the aging peasantry with property.
The poor (non-liquid) old owner is forced to continue on his own or to enter into so-called partnerships.
clod June 29, 2017
The government promotes sustainability only they themselves oppose it in every possible way to meet these goals

Our tax system works in every possible way to build up wealth against the left for the right you have to pay
Subscriber
erik June 29, 2017
these kinds of owners should ask themselves why they are holding the ground. There is probably no successor, then it is better to sell and invest (more return and more space on the land market). These kind of people are the biggest brake on ground mobility and ground quality. or an exemption for this or sell!!
Karel June 30, 2017
First, drop off all subtenants and fine the accountants who cooperate in this
Subscriber
erik June 30, 2017
That's right, but if the rvob doesn't keep to its own contracts, who will or will check?
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

News Ground

'Stop soil leads to more arable farming area'

Background Ground

Do you choose the farmer or the investor in the tenancy law?

News Ground

French land prices rise, but trade collapses

News Ground

Price dip for arable land, grassland more expensive again

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register