Blog: Robert Hoste

'Pig farmers break with the past'

10 May 2017 - Robert Hoste - 6 comments

Pig farming in the Netherlands has traditionally been supply-oriented, cost-driven and does not produce in fixed chains. That's a dead end. Production costs in Dutch pig farming are increasingly out of step with neighboring countries such as Germany, Denmark and Spain.

Moreover, social acceptance for intensive livestock farming is low and the market risks in production are increasing. Then as an entrepreneur you have to be very strong technically and economically to be able to sustain this in the long term. Admittedly, the market is attractive at the moment and pig farmers now have money left over to plug gaps or reserve for future bad times. So why bother too much? But you have to fix the roof when the sun shines and the bad economic times are guaranteed to come.

Added value for better prices

being distinctive
The pig production of the future is oriented in chains, because as a chain you can be stronger and share risks. Moreover, you can then distinguish yourself in the sales market and manage the balance between supply and demand. This distinctiveness and demand-driven production is desperately needed to achieve higher consumer prices and thereby improve margins for all links in the chain. You can also reduce failure costs in the chain, such as unnecessary costs due to incorrect timing of delivery or product quality.

I imagine this as follows: pig farmers will work closely together in producer associations; these producer associations enter into a long-term partnership with the meat industry on the basis of equality. This cluster of producers' associations and meat industry is distinctive in the market and can make agreements with supermarkets and other buyers on the basis of equality. The terms 'equivalence', 'long-term' and 'distinctive' are keywords for the pig production of the future for me.

Breaking with the past 
However, this requires a break in thinking, an "Umdenk" as the Germans say. When I surveyed pig farmers more than 10 years ago whether they would like to produce in an integration, there was an interesting response: 'Only if that is the only way to survive.' Entrepreneurship is in their blood for pig farmers and many want to be free to do business. But only the largest and most efficient pig farmers are strong enough to survive.

For others, a break in thinking is necessary: ​​to give up a bit of freedom in order to be able to cope with the interplay of forces of the future. It should not be a complete vertical integration, with the control of the entire chain in one hand. Then you would take the entrepreneurship of pig farmers off their hands, and with it the drive for maximum performance.

Take the Sustainable Pork Chain as an example 

Creating equality
The shift in thinking has started in the Netherlands, as witnessed by a number of good partnerships (such as Good Farming Star and the Sustainable Pork Chain), where a start has been made with added value and distinctiveness. But here too the position of the pig farmers must be strengthened, so that they have an independent role in the production chain and there is balance in the negotiations (think of the term equality).

Short-term thinking, unfortunately a characteristic of the meat industry, must make way for the new approach with, I repeat again: long-term cooperation on the basis of equality in order to be distinctive in the market. Then there will be sunshine after the rain.

Robert Hoste

Robert Hoste is an Economist Pig Production at Wageningen Economic Research (WUR). He is involved in 3 tasks: sector and business economics in pig farms in the Netherlands, international analyzes and the production chain.
Comments
6 comments
Subscriber
dekil 10 May 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ondernemen/columns/column/10874459/varkenshouders-break-with-het-past][/url]
'producer associations, 'equivalence', 'long-term' and 'distinctive''.

Establishing producer associations is great, the POV also sees that as an ideal, it is difficult to realize, but will be successful in the long run.

'long-term' and 'distinctive'' is no problem.

But then equally. This is where it ends. Whatever agreement you make with supermarkets, if there is a piece of shelf that yields too little, it will be removed, without mercy. Plus they are super arrogant.

I agree with Robert, but it has to deal with outside the supermarket. Maybe internet sales and refrigerated courier or something.
john 10 May 2017
the retail landscape will change extremely in the coming years. More or less we will soon be back with the old-fashioned srv man. Only now all orders are ready in the bus and instead of 6 bottles of milk, he now puts a full box of groceries in the appropriate parcel hatch (the letterbox also goes out).

Retail will no longer be able to distinguish on cost price, but will have to come up with a good story and for that they need producers terribly. The retailers with the products that have a good price/quality ratio and image will convert the most.

We are at the forefront of a new food revolution and a group of conscious farmers can respond well to that.
yep 11 May 2017
Do you really believe that a pig farmer who participates in Good Farming Star or KDV earns more than someone on the free market. compared over a 5-year period. Not me....

I maintain that there is only one way and that is cost price, but then you have to sail on the ship on time, and that went wrong for many. They also do not survive in an integration.
Hans 11 May 2017
Robert's vision goes completely wrong at the end of the piece. There he mentions "good" examples that yield poor results. If you don't look further than the feed gain, KDV and GFS score slightly better because of the yield. After the feed profit, however, it is drama and especially today with good prices you miss the turnover per euro of invested capital. Rather than venting this view, it would have been more helpful to research the below-average returns of his beloved POs like KDV, GFS, Frievar, Family Farmers, and others.
of platings 15 May 2017
Well seen Hans, I myself have also been cheated by Frievar, read Lorist and his friends. In the end, they are only busy trying to get the farmer as much money as possible out of the pocket again.
Jan Lavrijsen 15 May 2017
I am 100% behind Robert's statement. We have to start somewhere. For example, if you look at the Treaty of Rome in the 50s and where we stand today as an EU. People look more at expectations than at what has already been achieved in the meantime. Before Mansholt, there was still a food shortage in Europe. Now we have a surplus. If China closes the door, we'll have a bigger problem than when Russia closed the border. This is how high the level of self-sufficiency in the EU is today. We must not be short-sighted.
leo 16 May 2017
where love has to come from one side, it is usually short-lived
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up