Opinions Wouter Job

Farmers are going to miss Rik Grashoff

June 7, 2018 - Wouter Baan - 14 comments

This week it was announced that Rik Grashoff, Member of Parliament and agricultural spokesperson for GroenLinks, is leaving political The Hague for private reasons. Although Grashoff can be seen as an agricultural critic, he at least had a vision.

In his time as a Member of Parliament, Grashoff aspired to a different approach to conventional agriculture and livestock farming, that is clear. His views and ideas regularly made the (agricultural) news. In short, he aspired to a different agricultural system; a system with fewer animals, fewer crop protection products and more nature-inclusive. 

Well versed
The difference with some other (political) agricultural critics is that Grashoff had a vision. He stuck to the facts, actually made counter-proposals and never got sentimental. That cannot be said of everyone in the House of Representatives. During the last agricultural debate about animal welfare, the Party of the Animals still showed sentimental photos of so-called abuses in pig farming. I don't see Grashoff doing that anytime soon, although he could be fierce. 

Grashoff was always substantiated for or against 

Grashoff also did not shy away from constructive discussions. On the annual conference van Nevedi (November 2017) he imagined himself, he said, literally in the lion's den. I didn't think his contribution was bad. He had better file knowledge than pro-farmers in the room and thus easily countered the criticisms. At the time, he advocated circular agriculture, with livestock farming as a processor of residual flows. Not so much about cleaning up all the animals. Grashoff also argued for a better earning model for farmers. Although this thought may have been a bit idealistic, no farmer could object. 

Successor abhors livestock farming
Incidentally, this blog is not a plea for Grashoff; I only know him from public appearances. I dare say that with the resignation of Grashoff, a political grindstone for Dutch agriculture and livestock farming will disappear in The Hague. A constructive obstacle is something that is likely to benefit rather than harm the position of agricultural exports. It is not without reason that Dutch agriculture is highly regarded abroad in terms of animal welfare and the environment. 

His successor (Laura Bromet) says he abhors intensive livestock farming. So it remains to be seen whether things will improve for farmers from 7 June. The opposition of GroenLinks will probably sound even more shrill and fierce than ever.

Wouter Job

Wouter Baan is editor-in-chief of Boerenbusiness and Food Business. He also closely follows the raw materials markets and focuses on animal proteins such as dairy and meat. He regularly interviews leaders from the agricultural sector and the food world.
Comments
14 comments
Subscriber
cheese head June 7, 2018
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ondernemen/blogs/column/10878812/boeren-gaan-rik-grashoff-nog-missen][/url]
Then that grashoff literally and figuratively sewed us in
Subscriber
Skirt June 7, 2018
The coming elections will be of great importance to the farmers, the GroenLinks may then become the largest party if the VVD falls.
We all know which way the agricultural sector will then go, the CAP policy from 2020 will be such that Member States themselves are allowed to decide much more about how these funds are spent, which would be grist to the mill for the Green Left to pluck money that is intended for farmers to use for nature, etc. Environmental legislation will also become much stricter (pesticides will have a hard time).
hans June 7, 2018
Kjol, you're right, but... take this opportunity I'd say.
Producing for the world market is with Ned. impossible under circumstances, as the dairy farmers are now showing, RFC cannot compare at cost price on the world market.
Dutch employees do not compete with each other, and certainly do not compete on cost price with Asians. This is only possible through social, left-wing policies.
Continuing on the chosen path, halving the number of farmers every 20 years has also happened, the banks will not finance this, or the land price will have to halve (who wants this?).
More nature, for a fee can still be a solution for many farmers, and an opportunity for the rest because of less production. Less production is then a condition, although this goes against the basic principles of the EU, at least maintaining agricultural production in every country every year. Look at Gr. Li. this will defend in Brussels.
Haarlemmermeer June 7, 2018
kjol what a shame that we cannot compete in the world market. We grow as no1 bulbs, seed potatoes, plant onions, onions, table and fries potatoes, high-quality milk products, etc etc.
We can do with a little less pesticides and fertilization. Halve the footprint. Provided with a substantive political discussion about neinics, fipronil, glyphosate, etc
shoemakers1 June 7, 2018
That's how it is, we can take on the whole world, but we must have the same starting point, and not be completely put back by politics like now
jpk June 7, 2018
Ned is the land with the highest yield per hectare, the highest quality standards and the lowest environmental impact, just now let the yield on the farm come into its own for the following generations
Skirt June 7, 2018
@haarlemmermeer, Hans is talking about not being able to compete anymore, now we can still do that correctly. However, if our toolbox of crop promotion measures is locked, you can certainly forget about bulbs and seed potato cultivation. These crops will fail without chemicals, no buyer is interested in second-rate starting material.
hans June 7, 2018
Politics is lobbying, and the majority decides. Just leave the Ned. agriculture contribute nothing to either of them. You demand a level playing field, forget it in our big city country. Live in that reality. You also have advantages, a well-paid market, rural support, side branches. Use it.
Skirt June 7, 2018
Idd, you can sacrifice the most fertile areas of the planet with the highest level of knowledge for nature and political games led by voters in the most spoiled country in the world. That is a choice, and this indicates how far we have strayed from the sober mind.
hans June 7, 2018
Agriculture in itself has not contributed much to the current status of the Netherlands. Natural gas, Rotterdam, banks and a tax haven are the pillars of where the Netherlands stands now. The highest level of knowledge, perhaps once in the field of agriculture, is also a thing of the past with the mathematicians from Wageningen. Complaining, pathetic woman-seeking farmers who manure, spray and mud the roads, that's what today's modern Dutchman is tired of.
Subscriber
Skirt June 7, 2018
hans wrote:
Agriculture in itself has not contributed much to the current status of the Netherlands. Natural gas, Rotterdam, banks and a tax haven are the pillars of where the Netherlands stands now. The highest level of knowledge, perhaps once in the field of agriculture, is also a thing of the past with the mathematicians from Wageningen. Complaining, pathetic woman-seeking farmers who manure, spray and mud the roads, that's what today's modern Dutchman is tired of.


I think you are completely lost, I have never heard so much nonsense before, it is better to ask a psychiatrist if there is still a possibility of rescue. It is clear to me that you at least have the knowledge level of a parasite, but you probably can't help that if I listen to you like this.
hans June 7, 2018
People always talk about agricultural exports, the second largest exporter in the world. Give me the numbers when you subtract the throughput, and you'll see it's a much lower net amount. Then you also deduct the import for domestic use, because you can export nicely if you also import the same product.
My last sentence is not entirely my point of view, by the way, but how the average Dutch person, many of whom vote for Gr Li, thinks.
roy June 10, 2018
@hans. You shouldn't pretend that your stupid left-wing ideas are the standard. How much Dutch agricultural product do you think is shipped in Rotterdam? And who is that partly thanks to? You talk about agriculture without knowledge, and you talk about sentiment. So how many arguments do you think you have?
hans June 10, 2018
roy, the reason that so much is shipped in Rotterdam, and flown to and from Schiphol, is because of the oil terminals there of, among others, Shell. Trade, so what we're talking about here, look for the cheapest transport. Agricultural product is only a part of that, and Dutch agricultural product is part of that.
Please come with the real Dutch produced net export figures, and we know what we are talking about.
Kjol, with his vast knowledge, has not yet responded to this.
Skirt June 10, 2018
@hans, 1 fool can answer more questions than 10 wise.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register