Feeling of dependence

'Data has to go back to the farmer'

June 1, 2017 - Esther de Snoo - 2 comments

The feeling of reliance on third parties to interpret company data is growing among farmers. 'It doesn't feel good for farmers. Data must be returned to the farmer', says Anne Bruinsma, co-founder of Farmhack.nl.

Farmers have a growing need to be able to analyze and interpret the data of their farm themselves. That is what Bruinsma says. She will speak on Thursday at the AgriFood & Tech event in Almere, organized by NRC and supported by Boerenbusiness† Bruinsma is co-founder of Farmhack.nl, a company engaged in opening up data for farmers.

indicate yourself
She told the approximately 150 attendees that the way the data revolution is progressing in agriculture no longer feels right for many farmers. 'They miss the opportunity to interpret the data of their own company. Farmers are often dependent on third parties and resistance to that is growing.'


2 examples
Bruinsma mentions 2 examples. “John Deere is no longer a hardware company that sells tractors. It's a data company. If a farmer buys or leases a John Deere tractor equipped with all kinds of technology, the data is no longer his. That's a big flaw.'

Monsanto will soon know more than the farmer himself

Nothing more to say about own company
As another example, Bruinsma mentions the way in which the Monsanto concern handles the data of their farmers. Monsanto now collects so much data from the farmers to which they supply seeds, crop protection products and other services. Farmers fear that they no longer have a say in their own farm. 'Monsanto and the shareholders will soon know more about the farms they supply than the farmer himself. That instills fear in farmers and Monsanto suffers from it in America', says Bruinsma.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
2 comments
peta June 1, 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ondernemen/tech/ artikel/10874705/data-moet-weer- Terug-naar-de-boer][/url]
That data and its importance should not be so exaggerated. Cause and effect should not be confused. Whether things that cannot be sufficiently identified from the data and may be the underlying main cause of consequences that are therefore linked to something else, you can't do anything with that. Is just firewood! What is disturbing is that, for example, boer en bunder simply makes all the lots of everyone public, while the land users involved have not been asked for permission. Government with a good law on privacy does nothing with it when it comes to farmers. And LTO makes that happen. Such advocacy is too sad for words! Monetizing my data for which I receive nothing, not even a word of thanks, bothers me immensely!
Anne Bruinsma June 6, 2017
Hi Petatje,
Boer&Bunder only visualizes data that has been published by government or knowledge institutions as open data. Boer&Bunder itself does not make any data public.

The government makes data public because access to public data offers opportunities to create new value with data. If you see that Boer&Bunder now has almost 4.000 users daily, you can say that it has succeeded.

Another motive for ensuring good access to data is data quality - because how do you test data if it flies out of the yard through the back door and only commercial technology providers can turn it into chocolate? Then as a farmer you will only have the choice between the black box of the 1, or the other.. That can/should actually be different!
sand farmer June 9, 2017
Well, getting data back. That means you've already given it away in advance. And no attention has been paid to that. So better read fine print under the papers you put a scribble on. Should be there then.
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up