Requirements drastic and expensive

Strict vehicle regulations surprise sector

5 January 2018 - Niels van der Boom - 58 comments

Mechanization companies, importers and manufacturers are at a crossroads. From 1 January 2018, an approval requirement for towed agricultural vehicles will apply in the Netherlands. This concerns transport vehicles and towed equipment. The strict requirements also come as a surprise to the federation of Fedecom.

The Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management (I&W) has chosen to implement the new European regulation in the Vehicle Regulations. This means that, in addition to the 'permanent requirements', newly sold vehicles must meet a strict duty of approval† These new regulations will come into effect on 1 January 2018. This causes major problems; new tractors and vehicles do not meet the requirements. The additional cost item is substantial.

The ministry stands firm

Fedecom surprised
Trade association Fedecom says it is surprised with the implementation of the European regulation (EU 167/2013). They have been busy in the past year introducing a license plate on agricultural vehicles. With the rejection of the registration number, the approval requirement for vehicles also came to a standstill. However, the legislation has come into effect. For the time being, the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management is sticking to it, as a result of which new towed vehicles have to deal with strict requirements.

Other European countries (Belgium, Germany and France) use national approval requirements. The new regulation does not apply in these countries. According to the ministry, this is not possible in the Netherlands, because our country did not have a statutory approval requirement.

Substantial expense
The new regulations mainly include adjustments to the braking system. They are drastic and expensive. The costs run into the thousands of euros. Vehicles that do not meet the new requirements may no longer be sold in the Netherlands. The result is that mechanization companies, importers and manufacturers try to supply as many nameplates as possible with the year of construction 2017.

Obligation of approval in short:

  • Vehicle over 8.000 kilos (R & S category): two-line braking system hydraulic or air pressure and automatic load-dependent brake adjustment ALR.
  • Vehicle under 8.000 kilos (R&S category): overrun brake and breakaway braking device.
  • Tractor: dual-line braking system
  • Category R: underrun protection, side protection (above 40 kilometers per hour).
  • Category R & S: width marking above 2,55 meters

Two-line braking system
The most important change is the obligation to have a dual-line braking system. It may be operated hydraulically or by air pressure. The requirement applies to vehicles with a maximum permissible laden mass of more than 8.000 kilograms. An additional problem is that new tractors are not equipped with a dual-line braking system as standard. On new tractors, 1 extra brake line is allowed until 2020. For existing tractors, this is 2021.

This concerns not only transport vehicles (category R), but also trailed implements (category S). A large feed mixer or irrigation reel must therefore also meet strict requirements. On vehicles with a maximum permissible mass of less than 8.000 kilos, a breakaway braking device and an overrun brake must be present.

2,55

meter

is the maximum width without width marking

Protections
In addition to the braking system, transport vehicles must be equipped with an underrun protection and side shielding (above 40 kilometers per hour). Common abroad, but not in the Netherlands. With a vehicle width of more than 2,55 metres, both transport vehicles and implements must be provided with width markings. Europe uses a maximum width of 2,55 meters for transport vehicles. In the Netherlands this is the maximum bucket width. The vehicle may be a maximum of 3 meters wide with tires.

Procrastination
The sector has been surprised by the introduction of these new requirements. Not everyone is aware of this, as it turns out in practice. Fedecom has submitted an application to Minister Cora van Nieuwenhuizen to postpone the new requirements until January 1, 2019. The idea is to first introduce a registration requirement, followed by an MOT requirement and an approval requirement for vehicles with the new requirements.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Niels van der Boom

Niels van der Boom is a senior market specialist for arable crops at DCA Market Intelligence. He mainly makes analyses and market updates about the potato market. In columns he shares his sharp view on the arable sector and technology.
Comments
58 comments
lieke. 5 January 2018
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ondernemen/tech/ artikel/10877122/strict-vehicle regulation-verrast-sector][/url]
This is what the Dutch government is all about now. Not communicating clearly and imposing the rules a la minute.Echt Haarlemmer dijkjes.Net like a tax increase that can always be done quickly. (promotion haas). A tax reduction always takes years if it ever comes. (action snail). And once again the government appears not to be a cooperative and reliable partner for hard-working agricultural Netherlands. Where is the government's respect for agricultural Netherlands? † The government should earn respect, but not enforce it in a wrong way.
Subscriber
freebooter 5 January 2018
Mechanization and importer are concerned ????
The costs (including 20% ​​profit on parts) are passed on to the farmer!
Subscriber
ik 5 January 2018
It's time to go to The Hague and show us what needs to be converted.
Ton Westgeest 5 January 2018
That was coming....Cumula just asked the minister, license plates and stricter rules. Probably from a competition point of view, now the license plate is the following.....
Douwe 5 January 2018
It no longer seems normal to me that stricter requirements will be imposed, there are combinations that are heavier than trucks.
First think then act 5 January 2018
Little history:
You saw a decrease in the number of road deaths in all sectors. Except in the agricultural traffic sector.
In addition, the Dutch law (Agricultural traffic may not exceed 25 km/h) was no longer in line with practice (tractor can and often goes > 40 km/h). It is of course strange that even for a simple moped or ahw applies: driver's license, approval requirements, license plate and maximum speed. While in agriculture the legislation of 1951 (max 25 km/h) is still valid and because of the lack of a registration number it cannot be enforced.
The other European countries had not been idle in the last decades in terms of traffic requirements and were ahead of the Netherlands. It is useful if vehicle requirements are the same throughout Europe, both for builders and users of vehicles. You must also be able to buy/sell a vehicle/tool ​​across the border, new or 2nd hand. So, years ago, EU laws were passed to make the type-approval requirements the same. This includes the EU 167/2013, mentioned in the article.

At the request of the House of Representatives, the Ministry of Infrastructure & Water Management started working together with the RDW to arrange a few things.
There were also major advantages for Dutch agriculture:
* Traffic barriers that put agriculture in a bad light can be prosecuted by means of license plates. Image has become more important for farmers than we suspect!
* The tractor is now legally allowed to drive faster and can therefore use other roads.
* There was a particularly favorable transitional arrangement to provide existing agricultural equipment unseen and unapproved (!), via a simple online registration with a license plate within 5 minutes.
* Costs per vehicle only a few bucks.

The surprise was great in December 2016 when the 2nd chamber voted against its own proposal. Rather stupid, because it could have brought great benefits to Dutch agriculture and mechanization.

The situation that has now arisen is somewhat like the Brexit panic:
* We now have outdated laws that no longer match the other countries.
* We have committed ourselves to introduce an MOT in May 2018 (this year) for tractors > 40 km/h. However, with the cancellation of the agricultural registration number, the RDW does not have a system option to register a vehicle MOT. After all, the software is completely written on a license plate from moped to truck. New software would cost years and millions of euros. Resulting in millions of fines from the EU.
* The Insurers are already rubbing their hands. If you drive faster than is legally permitted (and you already do that above 25 km/h, after all, the old law still applies) or if you have insufficient braking power and you have an accident, you are not insured. In a traffic accident with third-party injuries, a farmer always draws the short straw.

Please let's not throw in the towel for those few bucks and push for an agricultural license plate.

Better half turned than completely erred.
Driver 5 January 2018
Liekele, what nonsense our legislation for agricultural vehicles dates back to the Stone Age, while every other country has a license plate and inspection you knew it was coming.
Ton Westgeest 5 January 2018
Think first, then act, you've got it right. The drifting government has been sleeping as usual or has been too busy making up stupid rules. They should of course have long since provided the contractors with their tractors, which drive at 60 km per hour, with a license plate and a good inspection.
When you're cycling, they pull the folds out of your pants, often boys of barely 16 years... With a tonnage that a truck can still suck at. This is what causes most of the victims.

The traffic screens you talk about, which put agriculture in a bad light, are also there. So no farmers, but mostly contractors. But indeed they look at the farmers for it when it is actually the image of the contractor.

I can already see what is going to happen, everything that has an engine in it and that does not even come on the road must be inspected, license plate and the road is clear to come up with all kinds of rules around it. And those costs are all back on our plate.....
Student 5 January 2018
If we had now introduced the registration requirement and attached rules to it, we would not have been obliged to introduce this now. Fedecom was right after all. See previous articles here on BB.
Troy 5 January 2018
@douwe

Yes, but they don't drive 80.
Subscriber
his or her 5 January 2018
about danger it is much worse than everyone thinks go sprinkle compost on your land or in your back garden you will never get a clean soil statement from the junk that is in there but they don't talk about that
driver 5 January 2018
My son worked for two weeks in France on our intern's arable farm. They fell off their seats because of our tractor driver's license of 2000 euros and more and requirements are hardly checked or not at all. Here you are still overtaken while you turn left with the indicator on. Let CBR first make some tractor driving lessons mandatory for the car driver's license.
CUMELA does not realize enough who is a customer of its members. They are burglars.
Skirt 5 January 2018
It seems that tools will soon have to stay within 2.55 meters, that will be fun business for mechanization. Everything foldable or in length transport.
Career 5 January 2018
Hahaha what's going on again.
Joh, let everyone get the rambam anyway. Have a chat and just do your own thing.
I just cross the road with my 4 meter combis, handsome figure who stops me with my 265 hp.
Ton Westgeest 5 January 2018
Look, Kjol, there are bound to be rules again. Cumula knows that and like the vets, they lobby to get more work. Soon you will have to order a low loader to be able to rake because it is too wide...or call the contractor! One thing is for sure it won't get cheaper
Act 5 January 2018
License plate, fine. and furthermore, every combination that uses the public road must be provided with proper lighting, shielding of protruding parts and a braking system that ensures the legally prescribed braking deceleration. How and in what way is in my opinion not important "as long as it happens, is functional", and is controlled by means of normal traffic controls. Please patronize as little as possible of how we should do it all!!
Greuste potato 5 January 2018
Soon all farmers will be "bat-jes" Also the bdm-ers and non-bdm-ers.
German 5 January 2018
Fortunately, it doesn't bother you anymore than in your truck
Subscriber
kees 5 January 2018
This is again thanks to cumela!!!
Greuste potato 5 January 2018
German wrote:
Fortunately, it doesn't bother you anymore than in your truck

And luckily you have a lot of trouble with it.....
Subscriber
info 5 January 2018
We can act against all those rules, but we certainly have to be honest that we no longer live in the time of 40 years ago and the vehicle density has increased significantly. We drove then with tractors from 30 to 60 hp which had a weight of max. 6000 kg with a cart behind it of 5000 kg. Now we have total weights of 50 tons and a busier traffic, that safety needs a better guarantee is clear both of martial as a driver and that the user has more costs for this is not surprising. Let's face it, production per machine has really taken off in the last 50 years. Then the contractors are called quite a bit, they have the most modern machines with the safest brakes and work with personnel who have more experience in traffic than many other road users, for example cyclists with music to both ears and don't look at anything through red stairs and just shoot in front of you and then think it's crazy if they get under a vehicle, and blame the vehicle because it hasn't been paying attention.
Subscriber
erik 5 January 2018
Kjol, read carefully first, everything wider than 2.55 meters must be marked. Panic sower
Subscriber
info 5 January 2018
A registration requirement is not an added value, but an MOT for slow traffic above 25 km/h should already have been mandatory, especially for vehicles that drive on the public road with their trailer I say this with a question mark, because there must also be a a well-functioning brake on a tractor, after all, you will not drive a car without brakes. After all, it's about people's lives.
Harry 5 January 2018
From the fool.

When are we going to boycott cumela members?
silent willie 6 January 2018
Now I am a transporter, so from my point of view I would say: this should have been done years ago.
We have been dealing for years with contractors who use their equipment as trucks (road construction/construction), as it were, but also farmers who participate in this. How many farmers rent themselves out (with or without a tractor) to contractors when they themselves have a quiet time? Isn't that officially allowed?
Or farmers who sell land and spend the money on tractors with dumpers to hinder the transporters?
Every sector has bad apples, and we need enforcement for that... so also the agricultural sector!
Ton Westgeest 6 January 2018
ok, i give up, let's just let ourselves be peeping again....
Joep 6 January 2018
There is only one instigator of this condition and that is Cumula. Everything for your own gain....
Subscriber
chips 6 January 2018
freebooter wrote:
Mechanization and importer are concerned ????
The costs (including 20% ​​profit on parts) are passed on to the farmer!


That's how it really is!
bertha 6 January 2018
Yes, this is the cumela to the fullest.
Nicely thought out together with tln to get the ordinary boere vehicles off the road and that they have sole control over the transport.
With this membership cumela canceled.
Worthless instance
Herman 6 January 2018
I don't know if you're Bertha 13 but at least that's how you talk
Subscriber
agricult 6 January 2018
We simply pay 80.000 euros or more for this land, but responsible road use should not cost anything. What a bunch of Neanderthals here. Combinations up to 50 tons with a 16 year old with a mobile in front of him behind the wheel. What may a traffic accident cost (or a human life) Everything has to move with the times, but agricultural traffic still has to be treated as if it were a horse and carriage. Then use it again!
JWW 6 January 2018
Wheeled excavators and shovels etc. What are they supposed to do?
They are already checked. Only license plate?
the small farmer 6 January 2018
Totally agree with the transport sector and for safety, only the small farmer who only tours on his own farm with 50 to 100 hours per tractor per year is the financial cigar.
bumblebee 7 January 2018
agriklootje wrote:
We simply pay 80.000 euros or more for this land, but responsible road use should not cost anything. What a bunch of Neanderthals here. Combinations up to 50 tons with a 16 year old with a mobile in front of him behind the wheel. What may a traffic accident cost (or a human life) Everything has to move with the times, but agricultural traffic still has to be treated as if it were a horse and carriage. Then use it again!


What changes a tractor inspection to the driver, after inspection still a 16 year old texting behind the wheel.
In my opinion, the inspection adds nothing, and then convert all existing tractors and trailers to a 2-line hydraulic braking system. That's an idiot!! What a cost to the sector.
Moreover, there are still plenty of countries in Europe with hydraulic braking systems.
Subscriber
Dirk 7 January 2018
Bumblebee, therefore it would be even better if Cumela would make an effort to raise the minimum age for tractor drivers on public roads to 18 years. What they drive to the balls on their own property does not bother anyone, so there is no minimum age requirement. But it is clear that the current situation needs to improve.
peer 7 January 2018
why don't they do it in european way we live in 1 europe but in europe we all make our own rules i have the id that they are just empty words and it is all about costing us
Student 7 January 2018
Unbelievable how many farmers here always blame everything and everyone and are too stupid to realize that if you are always against everything, you will eventually get the lid on your nose. Agriculture is simply years behind in terms of road safety and something has to be done about that. Cumela LTO Fedecom has been saying this for years and they are right.
Skirt 7 January 2018
Student, shouting a lot does not improve the situation. How many road casualties are there currently at all due to the lack of a double brake line or something like that? Where is the factual substantiation that the implemented measures have an effect based on actual accidents as a result? By randomly introducing all kinds of technical rules, I see it more as panic football and is not based at all on a scientific analysis of a causal relationship between cause and effect of the accidents that have occurred. I would be in favor of a much more focused look at the circumstances in which and through which the accidents occur and taking measures accordingly. The design of roads will also have to be examined in this context, as well as the role of other road users, only when all participants (including the road authorities) start taking each other into account will something actually improve in terms of safety.
anton 7 January 2018
silent willie wrote:
Now I am a transporter, so from my point of view I would say: this should have been done years ago.
We have been dealing for years with contractors who use their equipment as trucks (road construction/construction), as it were, but also farmers who participate in this. How many farmers rent themselves out (with or without a tractor) to contractors when they themselves have a quiet time? Isn't that officially allowed?
Or farmers who sell land and spend the money on tractors with dumpers to hinder the transporters?
Every sector has bad apples, and we need enforcement for that... so also the agricultural sector!

You will probably have some....., but you say that many farmers with or without tractor hire themselves out to contractors. Could be, and what's wrong with that? But how many transport companies make (abusive) use of farmers in the high season, when there are at least 2 drivers on 1 car, such as in the beet campaign that lasts from mid-September to half February, = 6 months or longer. like the other, and sometimes there are also works that can only be done with a tractor and dumper. If you want to know the abuses, I can name a few, but I will spare you.
Joost 7 January 2018
Anton is the most narcissistic sacrophagus in the Western Hemisphere
bookscook 7 January 2018
They can introduce agricultural traffic rules as much as they want. However, the number of accidents involving agricultural traffic will not fall sharply. This is unfortunately because the other road users simply have no idea how agricultural vehicles naturally behave, whether a plow swerves when a tractor turns, or whether it can actually turn left when it turns on the left turn signal. Have had enough examples of near misses by hasty fellow road users who only have a haze before their eyes, pass as quickly as possible!!!
1000 flashing lights or warning signs won't help with that! So no double brake lines, inspections or license plates.
Just emphatically include it in driving lessons for other traffic as well. Just like giving space to trucks that want to merge in or out on the highway, etc..
A major shortcoming in driving lessons, but perhaps in the total education in our fast western world, thinking along and taking into account others and therefore other road users!
anton 7 January 2018
Joost wrote:
Anton is the most narcissistic sacrophagus in the Western Hemisphere

You feel addressed, I understand?
Take a pill tonight, you will be better tomorrow, and you can get back on the truck.
Subscriber
Dirk 7 January 2018
Is that all you have to say, Anton?
You don't have to give the well-known pill advice to someone with a different opinion!
Sometimes other people are right, you know? It is really not the case that as a farmer you are the center of society. You are part of it.
You know the expression: "farmer becomes human and gets to know the world"?
Subscriber
Dirk 7 January 2018
By the way, I see that another person like Dirk is responding here. I'm not that. I can say it sharply, but with decent words and no vulgar language.
anton 7 January 2018
Dirk wrote:
Is that all you have to say, Anton?
You don't have to give the well-known pill advice to someone with a different opinion!
Sometimes other people are right, you know? It is really not the case that as a farmer you are the center of society. You are part of it.
You know the expression: "farmer becomes human and gets to know the world"?

Silent willie, I wrote that he has points, that is, that he is right about a few things, but some bastards can't read well, you have to chew everything for them, and then they have to chew the cud for another day before they get it. thought explained it neatly for everyone, without hurting anyone
Martin 7 January 2018
@student: you paid attention, sometimes boarding on time is better. This had been coming for years anyway. As mentioned, we had the chance to have all vehicles registered for a few tens. If we are unlucky, this will only be possible after an inspection and adjustment of the vehicle.

@ Ton Westgeest: You are behind with your thought, how many farmers do not have a tractor that drives 50 or faster? Cumela's thought is to do it well and affordably now. Many are against this, including LTO now it will come as yet and not simple and if we are unlucky certainly not affordable.
Reminds me of things like current manure policy, first protesting very hard and burying our heads in the sand and now we are being punished harshly for this.

As you can guess I am for the license plate but now there will probably be 5 other rules that make it unworkable.
Ton Westgeest 8 January 2018
@student: farmers here always blaming everything and everyone and being too stupid

You should tell me which farmer can stop something, which farmer Uberhaubt can stop something in politics. And let's not consider whether they are stupid....
We are not a discussion partner anywhere, that is, Cumela, LTO, Fedecom, etc.

And by sowing division dairies, manure processors, etc. It's going to be a mess, not a farmer burying his head in the sand, Martin.
A farmer has no influence at all.....
agrifurby 8 January 2018
EU directive is already from 2013, so for those who come as a surprise, more media should follow. It entered into force in 2016.
Or the surprised persons wrongly thought that farmers' representatives from LTO would delay it by years, just like with the KIWA inspection of fuel tanks.
quite rude 8 January 2018
Cumela thinks that this way the rates will be raised again at the expense of the ordinary farmer who spends most of the hours driving his tractor in the field. Bah!
The problem is also that most narrow polder roads and non-through roads are used by road users who actually have nothing to do there and also have no understanding for those who have to earn their living there and also take care of the food of those understanding fellow road users!!
Silent Willy splashes about unfair competition, but he still has the option of buying a tractor and cart and driving them too. so don't bullshit Willy.
anton 8 January 2018
pretty rude wrote:
Cumela thinks that this way the rates will be raised again at the expense of the ordinary farmer who spends most of the hours driving his tractor in the field. Bah!
The problem is also that most narrow polder roads and non-through roads are used by road users who actually have nothing to do there and also have no understanding for those who have to earn their living there and also take care of the food of those understanding fellow road users!!
Silent Willy splashes about unfair competition, but he still has the option of buying a tractor and cart and driving them too. so don't bullshit Willy.

Well spoken. Quite rude.
silent willie 9 January 2018
@anton: a lot goes wrong in the transport sector, and we have ILT for that that enforces that.. and believe me, we don't like that either.. but companies that let farmers steer on their trucks are of course not only to blame .. a new license is important in this, otherwise a farmer or self-employed person or employment agency may not provide transport services... so tackle it, and don't whine. I also do not receive income support if I do not have enough income.
silent willie 9 January 2018
@pretty rude: apparently I'm splashing about this because of course this is the case, and then you say that I should also do as some farmers do? No, it doesn't work like that.. Here too, the following applies: tackle the distortion of competition, and if you don't agree with that, then get your NIWO permit and buy a truck. Also find out how reality works instead of dismissing it as someone else's problem.
socks 10 January 2018
This is not about a farmer who is busy in his field. He will hardly notice it either. Thirty or forty euros for a license plate can be removed. But the companies that are often or always on the road will still go after a new permit must, including administration that goes with it. This has been mandatory for years, so no news. Die inspection is also not much if you properly maintain your tractors and machines. Then the driving licenses and age still remain. The time that every aoc student received a tractor driving license with the diploma is over.A thorough training will have to replace this.These boys lack traffic insight.There are boys and girls here who have never driven on the public road before [themselves experienced], but have a [certificate] driver's license. This is no longer for sale at this time.
Subscriber
Berry 10 January 2018
It is also part of the experience. I regularly drive the tractor on the road during my harvesting work. I see a lot of motorists and truck drivers who perform all kinds of very dangerous antics to overtake the tractor at the last minute.
Agri 13 January 2018
Agrifurby is absolutely right. We would also like to export, don't we?
Then you have to comply with the EEC 2015/68, just like cars and trucks.
Yes, from 2015
Agri 14 January 2018
It's only 1 real agri, that's me please change your name.
peta 14 January 2018
silent willie wrote:
@pretty rude: apparently I'm splashing about this because of course this is the case, and then you say that I should also do as some farmers do? No, it doesn't work like that.. Here too, the following applies: tackle the distortion of competition, and if you don't agree with that, then get your NIWO permit and buy a truck. Also find out how reality works instead of dismissing it as someone else's problem.

Why distortion of competition?
We live in a free market economy, the supermarkets also sell washing machines, vacuum cleaners, etc..
The transport sector cannot handle the work at the moment anyway, what are they worried about? Because of those few farmers who don't participate in their price agreements? No longer of this time, this pathetic whining.
Besides, what's stopping them from buying some tractors with tippers?
Agri 14 January 2018
Such is the Petatje. Clear language and discussion closed.
jpk 15 January 2018
Fedecom is of the ostrich policy
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register