Activist was responsible

Belgian slaughter scandal deserves some nuance

30 March 2017 - Wouter Baan - 8 comments

The horror practices in the Flemish slaughterhouse, which came out last week, deserve some nuance. The activist, from the Dutch organization Animal Rights, held the position of equerry. This means that he was actually responsible for the affairs of the slaughterhouse.  

The activist behind the images let himself be hired as an equerry. The job description of an equerry means that the person in question, together with a team, must ensure that all procedures are carried out according to the rules. 'One of the tasks is to euthanize defective animals. He can do this by euthanizing himself or instructing someone on his team to do that. However, he is responsible at that time," said Thomas De Roover-De Brauwer, CEO of Debra Group, the parent company of the Flemish slaughterhouse.

We don't want to shirk the responsibility 

Despite the fact that the equerry failed in his duties, De Roover-De Brauwer does not want to shirk the responsibility. "The behavior of the equerry does not justify the behavior of the other employees, who were present at the time," said the CEO. He also stated that the internal procedures had not been followed by the employees concerned. That is why the Flemish slaughterhouse chooses not to consider legal action.

The slaughterhouse was officially closed by the Flemish minister, Ben Weyts, when the images became public. However, the slaughterhouse does not agree with this decision and has therefore gone to the Council of State to challenge the closure. According to De Roover-De Brauwer, the Flemish slaughterhouse wants to be active again in the chain as soon as possible.

Incidentally, the slaughterhouse had plans to increase the current 1,5 million slaughters per year by one million. It remains to be seen whether these expansion plans can be realised. The municipal council of Tielt had been against the expansion plans for some time. After seeing the images, the province of West Flanders is also holding off. According to the parties involved, the slaughterhouse must first have the basics in order.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Wouter Job

Wouter Baan is editor-in-chief of Boerenbusiness. He also focuses on dairy, pig and meat markets. He also follows (business) developments within agribusiness and interviews CEOs and policymakers.
Comments
8 comments
Subscriber
quite coarse 30 March 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/varkens-voer/ artikel/10873965/Belgisch-slachtschandal-deserved-enige-nuance-]Belgian slaughter-scandal deserves some nuance[/url]
Would be nice if this was also in the national news and hope this happens.
Subscriber
January 30 March 2017
That would be nice.
Jan 30 March 2017
Remains that management allowed this to happen and is shocked (perhaps more about the publication than about the abuse) that it happened. That management needs to go. Or is no one responsible?
It is appropriate to also publish the practice of the animal NGO with name and shame
Freddy Dutoit 30 March 2017
In any case, I haven't seen anything about it in the Belgian press yet. I thought it was strange that it was filmed so easily. It's as if a camera crew could film quietly.
So it turns out to be a fraud or at least a functional problem. The person who filmed is supposed to check and counter this. But how do you prevent such fraud? By placing an inspector at each supervisor and an inspector of the inspectors next to each inspector?
Cameras in the workplace? Good if you want this. But every year hundreds of people die as a result of traffic. Why is nobody calling to put cameras on every car and every street corner? Is animal welfare more important than human suffering?
Johan 30 March 2017
I also saw in the "seventh day" on the VRT how the representative of the slaughterhouse, I think a lawyer, defended himself with lame arguments and casually quoted the stable hand. If the tasks are clearly defined in the contract between the groomsman and the slaughterhouse, then some or all of the responsibility may be shifted to the groomsman. A court decision is necessary here to know whether this is really the case. The last word has clearly not been said on this.
karel 30 March 2017
That is why people should share these kinds of messages on social media as much as possible.
Pieter 30 March 2017
It is therefore very likely that this was set up by the Animal Rights group.
This should be checked out too!
David 30 March 2017
The official statement from Animal Rights: According to Animal Rights, the undercover employee who made the images in Exportslachthuis Tielt was not a 'stealer', but a 'stall assistant'. That is stated in his contract, according to the organization. The person in question worked through an employment agency for the slaughterhouse. He had no managerial position in the abattoir's waiting shed and therefore had no duty to reprimand staff if they treat animals incorrectly. (By the way, completely beside the point... fact that those staff members would do this comfortably and in front of a groomsman is 10X worse.)
curly tail 31 March 2017
Great, then we just need to get the contract above water
You can no longer respond.

What do the current
pigs & feed quotations

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register