News Warm remediation

Buying a million pig rights is not feasible

June 21, 2018 - Wouter Baan - 20 comments

Plans for the 'warm remediation' in pig farming will be revealed soon. Meanwhile, rumors are already circulating that the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV) wants to buy more than 125 million pig rights with an amount of €1 million.

Of the total budget (€200 million) for the so-called warm remediation, €125 million would be spent on buying pig rights. The remaining amount (€75 million) would go to sector innovation, as fell in early June New harvest to read.

At the beginning of June, pig rights were traded for a price of approximately €115 per right (South region). With the amount of €125 million, more than 1 million pig rights could be bought on paper, taking into account demolition and remediation costs. In the market, however, the feasibility of this calculation is strongly questioned by some.

Rights compensation not enough 
According to Mark van den Brand of rights mediation company Agripunt, this calculation cannot be done and an average pig farmer cannot stop at only a rights compensation. Van den Brand: "When a pig farmer stops, the bank will also have to be repaid." A realistic amount must also be set aside as a demolition fee for the stables in the yard.

Law money alone is not enough 

According to Van den Brand, far too little account has been taken of these aspects in the calculations outlined; according to him, the amount is no more than a compensation of rights. "However, a pig farmer cannot stop for rights money," says Van den Brand. He therefore estimates that the enthusiasm to participate in the warm remediation will probably be very limited if rights are paid.

"In that case, a pig farmer would probably prefer to transfer his rights to a fellow pig farmer." The willingness to participate in the warm remediation will probably only be released with a rights fee plus a substantial scrapping fee, the rights broker expects.

Depending on the duration
Jan Pijnenburg, advisor at DLV Advies, thinks that a young entrepreneur with a profitable pig farm will indeed not be enthusiastic about stopping the activities for rights money. However, not every entrepreneur is young and has a profitable pig farm. "Some people need a last push and then a rights fee may be sufficient", Pijnenburg estimates.

It remains to be seen whether €125 million is enough to buy up 1 million pig places, according to Pijnenburg. "In theory it is possible, although 1 million pig rights is quite a lot in practice." The degree of registrations will also depend, according to Pijnenburg, on how long the termination scheme, if any, will be open.

Historically, an average of 3% of pig farmers quit. There are years when hardly any pig farmers stopped, but a few years later they caught up again. Fewer companies have stopped in recent years, so this percentage may be increased again to approximately 7% in the coming years with the help of a scheme. But everything remains dependent on the additional conditions, the DLV advisor expects.

The additional conditions are crucial

Broad(er) package of measures
Hans Peters of Peters Vastgoed also states that a broader package of measures is needed to persuade pig farmers to participate in a termination scheme. Peters is thinking of cost-effective demolition subsidies or the so-called space-for-space scheme. "Pig farmers already have the choice to stop for rights money," says Peters.

Like the other rights brokers, Peters also notes that the rights market has meanwhile reacted to the news that pig rights may be bought up. Thus, the price is rising in all areas. Those who still want to buy rights this year realize, according to Peters, that it just has to happen now. However, the rumor has led sellers to demand higher prices, sometimes creating gaps between bid and ask prices.

Provided clarity quickly
Both the buying and selling parties benefit from clarity, let the brokers know. Clarity is probably coming soon; agriculture minister Schouten has promised to reveal the plans for the 'warm remediation' before the summer recess. Then it should become clear how deep the ministry wants to cut into the Dutch pig population. 

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Wouter Job

Wouter Baan is editor-in-chief of Boerenbusiness. He also focuses on dairy, pig and meat markets. He also follows (business) developments within agribusiness and interviews CEOs and policymakers.
Comments
20 comments
Subscriber
Hein June 21, 2018
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/varkens-feed/ artikel/10878973/mljoen-varkensrechten-opkopen-is- niet-haalbare][/url]
Well, just say it.... That something is about to happen, seems to be a fact
grunt June 21, 2018
The more permissions that are cleaned up, the better.
Still missed opportunity that the POV has not agreed to exchange pig phosphate for cattle. (with considerable creaming)
Hertha June 21, 2018
Knorrestein is right, also with compulsory barn demolition,
In this way we keep all parties satisfied.
shoemakers1 June 21, 2018
our government does not allow money to go to the farmers in any way, if something happens abroad they are immediately ready, here all farmers have to be destroyed
Gerard June 21, 2018
With the ROK scheme we also saw that pig farmers piled up subsidies. Municipality, province, etc. Now that the pig cycle has entered the trough again, the rise in rights prices is short-lived.
Subscriber
burke Brabant June 22, 2018
it could just be that the government buys our rights for a tip, and then uses part of it for the bottlenecks in cattle farming, a pity that we ourselves cannot agree to exchange 10% of each right, for example. that part could also be shortened when transferring, so you eventually get a little less manure, and everyone can decide for themselves whether and when he trades that 10%
doubting pig farmer June 22, 2018
Plan bird watcher in combination, the 200 million could be used for sanitation plans in the sector category
then the government would be better off letting the cattle farmers pay the fees and plan the remediation for them
john June 22, 2018
that 200 million will be used specifically in areas where there is a real problem with nuisance, simply a public registration for stoppers will not work. The companies that cause nuisance really don't participate > there is really still talk about buying away. So it is likely that companies will participate that cause less nuisance and that are not eligible for expansion of nature, housing and industry. That's exactly what the 200 million is for. Making room, limiting nuisance and solving bottlenecks = customization.
The fact that a discontinuing company needs 100% rights to surrender will have a price-increasing effect. Because many companies do not have sufficient rights because a part has already been sold and now has to be bought back.
piet June 22, 2018
Do not count yourself rich, the government (80% civil servants on agriculture vote green left) really does not grant us farmers.
bacon steak June 22, 2018
i think john is living in a dream. and I don't see those 200 million coming into farmers' hands yet. Only economy counts, so exchanging pig phosphate for cattle isn't that bad
bacon steak June 22, 2018
maybe it's better to use that 200 million to keep the POV contribution in line?
john June 23, 2018
that 200 million is clearly intended for the congested areas.. so buying up companies that are provided with the necessary pig rights that cause a relatively large amount of nuisance.

So if you want to buy a barn of 1000 pigs on the edge of a nature reserve or residential core, you will have to ensure that there are 1000 rights under it to qualify for a demolition and termination subsidy. Simple requirement and truly solution oriented.

Less nuisance and above all less MANURE. Converting pig rights to cattle manure does not result in a kilogram less phosphate and only more nitrogen, that is really not going to happen.

I see it happening immediately that entrepreneurs who are locked up with their own company sign up for this and buy back locations where there is less nuisance.
john June 23, 2018
Another example: a mixed farm with 80 dairy cows and 800 fattening pigs immediately receives 125 euros per pig rights and 125 demolition and termination subsidy. That yields 200.000 euros, enough to buy phosphate for 25 cows.. win win. The demolition of the stables can be paid later from the balance that can be taken from the cows. This is also an interesting arrangement for mixed farms in congested areas.
bacon steak June 23, 2018
funny example but not realistic. certainly not that scrapping premium of 125 euros. The ROK scheme also required a permit to be revoked, so a premium for fewer pigs and then filling it with cattle has turned the world upside down.
bacon steak June 23, 2018
In my opinion, it is better to use that 200 million to give 4000 (working) air scrubbers a 50.000 euros as a gift to livestock farmers who want to continue. then the so-called overload on a larger scale is immediately remedied, and not buy away a few lucky ones who want to build an even bigger stable afterwards just to keep the load out. and that the entire sector is then again judged on the construction of mega stables. (see example: reconstruction municipality of gemert/bakel area de Rips)
Hendriksen June 23, 2018
Forget that swapping.

A condition of the EU to maintain the derogation in NL was that a phosphate ceiling was set per sector (pigs, chickens, cows).
This was enacted into law last December.
So if the pig sector hands in phosphate, this is not allowed to go to another sector

I think the ultimate goal of our government is that eventually there will be fewer, fewer, fewer cows, pigs and chickens. (and farmers).
john June 25, 2018
https://www.ed.nl/reusel-de-mierden/onderzoek-moet-boeren-uit-reusel-duidelijkheid-bieden~a38157e4/

this is what I meant. Then it is immediately clear which target group is eligible for 'warm remediation'.
farmer's wife 6 July 2018
Surely more would be announced before July 7? Or has everything been postponed to September? does anyone know this
shoemakers1 6 July 2018
only the self-employed must adhere to all deadlines, for civil servants it is more important that they can go on holiday on time
time 7 July 2018
200 million is just a shadow.
this really isn't going to happen.
farmer's wife 7 July 2018
still answer by schouten. only remains for most a gray area how to proceed , a lot is said that you can not continue with now , at least that's how I read it
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register