BB TV Tax

'Don't cross out profit on the annual accounts'

6 February 2018 - Redactie Boerenbusiness - 7 comments

In the coming period, farmers will be working hard to get their 2017 annual accounts in order. Since almost all sectors have farmed well, the total profit below the line is often relatively high. This also means that more tax has to be paid, to prevent this the profit is minimized. Is that a smart move?

Banks are becoming stricter and that makes the outcome of the annual accounts increasingly important. Tax advisor Jos Schreurs of Accon avm explains what an optimal annual statement must meet.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this video? Let us know
Comments
7 comments
hans 6 February 2018
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/video/bb-tv/video/10877467/stripe-profit-op-de-jaarrekening-niet-weg][/url]
Can you afford taxes? And who has earned so much on average over the last 3 years? Nice talk from an accountant to make you pay even more, to his office.
Josh Schreurs 6 February 2018
Hans, I understand what you're saying. In practice, means of income is limited. You can certainly use this. The message of the message is that you also have to look carefully at the presentation of your company. This can best be combined with tax payment and the averaging you mentioned.
hans 6 February 2018
The "presentation" of your company can be good enough, this does not guarantee a good income. Changing Dutch and EU regulations, and international productions with our borders open only to agricultural products have a much greater influence on our incomes than our performance. Instead of "presentation" it is better to speak about performance. And you can't control it financially, as I indicated above. By the way, banks use very different criteria than your future. First of all, the interests of the bank itself are looked at, who gets a credit or not.
hard 7 February 2018
Jos, why are no business economic figures presented (just like in the large business community) towards banks, among others, towards the tax authorities, of course, the fiscal figures.
I am thinking in particular of a different representation of the valuations of land, livestock and stock on the one hand, and tax reserves and tax depreciation on the other.

For the banks, it is not only the operating profit that is important, but also the movement and the size of the shareholders' equity.
Jan Veltkamp 7 February 2018
If I need a loan and the bank doesn't look beyond the tax return, it's time to look for another bank that does employ experts who can pop through the tax return balloon. But unfortunately my own experience is also (Rabobank) that the "expert" told me that I should artificially increase the income on the tax return and then also qualify for a higher loan. So with the same income you will pay more tax, but then I could get a larger loan. Fortunately, there was an alternative with more realism and knowledge.
emile happy lives 10 February 2018
if it is indeed the case that sbr has a mandatory character for the banks, then it is high time for the banks to also assume commercial annual accounts for the farmers. The banks also do this for the multinationals.
It is crazy that they act discriminating against their own members.
This subject must be placed on the agenda of Rabo's executive board.
Mathematics 11 February 2018
You choose to make tax figures yourself, you may also make business economic figures. In addition, I think cash is king, so if you can save tax, my advice is to do it!
Subscriber
Ad 13 February 2018
Dear Jan , what was that alternative ?
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up